Residents of San Francisco are raising significant safety concerns regarding a proposed housing project that seeks to increase the density of a lot with limited access. During a recent city meeting, community members voiced their apprehensions about a developer's plan to construct four units on a site previously limited to two units due to safety issues.

The project, which has undergone scrutiny since its initial proposal in September 2020, has been met with resistance from local stakeholders who argue that the narrow alleyway serving as the sole access point poses serious risks in emergencies. Concerns were amplified by a safety expert's testimony in 2020, which highlighted the likelihood of residents being trapped during disasters such as fires or earthquakes.

Community members emphasized that the alleyway, measuring only 42 inches wide, is inadequate for safe egress, particularly in emergency situations where residents may need to evacuate quickly. They pointed out that the alley's dimensions do not comply with safety regulations for the proposed number of units, raising questions about the appropriateness of the zoning designation granted to the project.

The discussion also touched on the implications of the zoning variance that allowed the developer to classify the lot as RH3, which permits more units than the previous RH2 designation. Critics argue that this decision lacks transparency and does not align with the city's zoning code's intent, which aims to ensure safety and accessibility.

In light of these concerns, residents are appealing for a comprehensive review of the project, urging city officials to reconsider the zoning variance and limit the development to two units as previously decided by the Board of Supervisors. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for future housing developments in the area, particularly regarding safety standards and community well-being.