The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) held a public hearing on July 4, 2025, to discuss initial proposals for negotiations between the district and the United Administrators of San Francisco (UASF). The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding working conditions, compensation, and the impact on student services.
Superintendent Wayne opened the session, emphasizing the importance of transparency in the negotiation process. He noted that both the district and the UASF were required to share their proposals publicly before negotiations could begin. This hearing provided an opportunity for public comments on these proposals.
Numerous school administrators voiced their frustrations about the current state of working conditions within the district. Many expressed that inadequate staffing and low wages were leading to burnout and a decline in the quality of education. For instance, Anna Clafter, a high school principal, stated that effective school leaders are crucial for stability and success, yet many are leaving due to low pay. Other administrators echoed similar sentiments, sharing personal testimonials about the challenges they face, including excessive workloads and insufficient support staff.
Several speakers highlighted the urgent need for better compensation for paraeducators and support staff, particularly for those working with students with special needs. Parents also joined the discussion, advocating for fair wages for educators to ensure that their children receive the necessary support and services.
Michael Essien, president of UASF, concluded the public comments by stressing the need for competitive compensation to attract and retain quality educators. He emphasized that the district cannot expect to improve educational outcomes while offering "last place wages."
The meeting underscored the critical issues facing SFUSD as it prepares for negotiations, with a clear call from both educators and parents for improved working conditions and compensation to better serve the students of San Francisco. The district is expected to consider these concerns as it moves forward with the negotiation process.