The San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) held a significant meeting on July 4, 2025, where parents and community members voiced urgent concerns regarding the support and compensation of paraeducators, as well as the consolidation of classes within the Filipino wellness program.

Betty Uhasker, a parent from Grama Elementary School, opened the discussion by advocating for higher wages for paraeducators. She emphasized the critical role these staff members play in supporting teachers and ensuring student safety, particularly in special education classes. Uhasker highlighted that the current wages are insufficient compared to the demanding nature of their work, urging the district to increase pay to attract and retain qualified paraeducators.

Jason Ortega, a parent from Bessie Carmichael Elementary School, raised concerns about the proposed consolidation of fourth and fifth-grade classes in the Filipino wellness program. He argued that this decision compromises the quality of education for students and undermines the district's goals of promoting Filipino language and culture. Ortega stressed the importance of community input in decision-making processes, advocating for the separation of these classes to enhance learning outcomes.

Emery Ortega, Jason's son and a sixth grader, echoed his father's sentiments, sharing his positive experiences in the Filipino pathway program. He expressed concern that combining classes would negatively impact students' learning and place undue pressure on teachers.

Tamika, a parent of a student in a special day class, highlighted safety issues stemming from staff shortages, which have led to unplanned school closures. She called for immediate action to ensure adequate staffing levels to support students with special needs.

Shari Sarinas, a long-time coordinator of the Filipino wellness program, reiterated the importance of maintaining separate classes for fourth and fifth graders. She argued that the program is vital for fostering Filipino culture and identity among students and is one of only two such programs in the country.

Marla, a representative from Parents for Public Schools, criticized the consolidation plan, stating it prioritizes fiscal concerns over the educational needs of the community. She urged the board to consider the long-term impacts of such decisions on students and families.

Jennifer, a former SFUSD employee, shared her personal experience with paraeducators, emphasizing their essential role in supporting students with special needs. She called for better compensation to ensure that paraeducators can continue their vital work.

The meeting underscored a collective call for action from parents and community members to address staffing issues and protect educational programs that serve the diverse needs of San Francisco's students. The discussions highlighted the need for the district to prioritize equitable support for both students and staff in its decision-making processes.