Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeal Filed Against Fleet Charging Permit for Autonomous Vehicles at 14th Street

February 28, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Appeal Filed Against Fleet Charging Permit for Autonomous Vehicles at 14th Street
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors convened on July 4, 2025, to address a significant appeal concerning the installation of electric vehicle chargers designated for fleet charging at 0140 Fourteenth Street. The proposal aims to convert a vehicle storage lot into a facility capable of charging 20 electric vehicles, specifically autonomous vehicles that will operate continuously throughout the city.

Mark Malouf, representing the appellant, emphasized the necessity of conditional use approval for fleet charging facilities, which he argued have previously circumvented public scrutiny by exploiting loopholes in the planning code. Malouf highlighted that companies operating autonomous vehicles, such as Waymo and Cruise, rely heavily on these charging facilities, which he claims have replaced traditional parcel delivery jobs.

Following Malouf, land use attorney Peter Ziblatt elaborated on the appeal, noting that the Board of Supervisors had recently closed a loophole that allowed fleet charging to proceed without conditional use approval if the existing use was classified as vehicle storage or a private parking lot. Ziblatt clarified the distinctions between these terms, explaining that vehicle storage refers to retail automotive uses, while private parking lots are non-retail and lack public access.

The discussions underscored the ongoing tension between the expansion of autonomous vehicle infrastructure and the need for regulatory oversight to ensure community interests are considered. The Board's decision on this appeal will likely set a precedent for future fleet charging installations in the city. Further deliberations are expected as the Board continues to navigate the complexities of urban planning and technological advancements in transportation.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal