Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

San Francisco Board of Appeals reviews privacy concerns for Santa Rosa Avenue permit

April 03, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

San Francisco Board of Appeals reviews privacy concerns for Santa Rosa Avenue permit
The San Francisco Board of Appeals convened on April 3, 2024, to address several key matters, including public comments and appeals regarding local building permits. The meeting was presided over by Vice President Alex Lemberg, alongside commissioners Rick Swig, John Trezvinia, and JR Epler, with legal guidance provided by Deputy City Attorney Jen Hoover.

One significant development was the withdrawal of appeal number 20Four-nine concerning properties on Stockton Street, which will not be heard as planned. This decision streamlined the agenda, allowing the board to focus on the remaining items.

The board also adopted the minutes from the previous meeting, with a notable amendment proposed by Commissioner Trezvinia. The amendment clarified the role of a speaker, ensuring accurate representation in the official record.

The primary appeal discussed involved Edward Gutowski and Alla Feldman, who raised concerns about a proposed three-story building at 39 Santa Rosa Avenue. The appellants expressed worries about privacy and safety, particularly regarding a second-floor balcony that could potentially overlook their property. They highlighted past incidents of strangers entering their backyard, emphasizing the need for protective measures to ensure their security.

The board's commitment to public access was evident, as they facilitated participation through various channels, including in-person attendance, Zoom, and telephone comments. This approach underscores the board's dedication to transparency and community engagement in local governance.

As the meeting progressed, the board continued to prioritize public input, ensuring that community voices are heard in decisions that affect their neighborhoods. The discussions and decisions made during this meeting reflect ongoing efforts to balance development with the rights and concerns of residents in San Francisco.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal