The City of San Francisco held a government meeting on July 4, 2025, to discuss the proposed budget and work program for fiscal years 2024 to 2025. The meeting began with a presentation outlining the criteria for centering equity in the city’s work programs. It was reported that 23% of all work programs would prioritize equity issues and populations, reflecting a commitment to equitable resource allocation.
The budget calendar was reviewed, indicating that the planning commission had met previously to discuss the draft budget and would reconvene to seek approval for the proposed budget. The budget is scheduled to be submitted to the mayor's office on February 21, with the mayor's proposed budget to be published on June 1, followed by consideration by the Board of Supervisors in June.
During the meeting, public comments were invited, but no members of the public came forward to speak. The discussion then shifted to specific inquiries from commissioners regarding planning and permit volumes. Commissioner Baldov raised concerns about the decline in miscellaneous permits, which are referrals from other agencies, and how this impacts overall permit volume.
Planning staff explained that the decrease in miscellaneous permits is due to fewer referrals from state and city agencies, which are not under their control. The conversation continued with questions about staffing levels, as Director of Administration Tom DiSanto confirmed that approximately 20 positions would remain unfilled to meet budgetary constraints. This raised concerns about whether the work plan would reflect a decrease in workload, to which DiSanto clarified that the attrition number is already factored into the work plan.
Commissioners also discussed the implications of reduced enforcement cases, noting that the number of complaints leading to enforcement actions has decreased. This trend indicates a shift in the types of projects being undertaken, with smaller projects becoming more common, resulting in lower associated fees.
Overall, the meeting highlighted the city's ongoing efforts to balance budgetary constraints with the need for equitable resource distribution and effective planning and enforcement processes. The next steps involve further discussions and approvals as the budget process continues.