In a recent San Francisco County government meeting, significant discussions centered around the release of funds aimed at supporting affordable housing initiatives in the South of Market (SoMa) area. The meeting featured Sheila Nicholas from the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development, who introduced a proposal for the allocation of $2.9 million from the SoMa Community Stabilization Fund to finance the permanent housing project at 566 Natoma Street.
The project, managed by the Mission Economic Development Agency (MEDA), involves a three-story building with five residential units, including four one-bedroom and one two-bedroom unit. This initiative is part of a broader effort to prevent the displacement of long-term residents in San Francisco, addressing the pressing need for affordable housing in a city grappling with rising living costs.
Amanda Fukatomi Lopez, a preservation project manager, detailed how the funds would be utilized. Approximately $3.6 million will repay a loan from the San Francisco Housing Accelerator Fund, while the remaining funds will cover project costs, including reserves and closing expenses. The financing is structured to ensure long-term affordability, with restrictions in place to maintain affordable rents for at least 99 years.
The SoMa Community Stabilization Fund, established to support housing stability in the area, has a current balance of over $10 million. The proposed funding aligns with the goals of the Small Sites Program, which aims to facilitate the acquisition and rehabilitation of multifamily rental buildings to enhance community stability and affordability.
In addition to the primary funding request, the meeting also addressed a companion resolution to release an additional $3 million from the stabilization fund. However, adjustments were recommended to ensure that the total funding request does not exceed the available reserves.
This meeting highlights the ongoing commitment of San Francisco's government to tackle housing challenges and preserve affordable living options for its residents. As the city continues to navigate its housing crisis, the outcomes of these funding proposals will be crucial in shaping the future of community housing initiatives.