Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Environmental Planner McKellar addresses cancer risk in construction health assessment

January 11, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Environmental Planner McKellar addresses cancer risk in construction health assessment
The City of San Francisco held a government meeting on July 4, 2025, focusing on environmental concerns related to construction projects and their potential health impacts. The discussion primarily revolved around the mitigation measures being implemented to address emissions during both construction and operational phases of development projects.

The meeting featured an inquiry from a council member regarding the adequacy of mitigation measures for construction emissions. Environmental planner Ms. McKellar reassured attendees that the project mandates the use of Tier 4 engines, which are the cleanest available, to minimize emissions. She emphasized that as technology advances, construction fleets are expected to become increasingly electrified and cleaner over time.

A significant point of clarification was made regarding the assessment of health risks associated with the project. It was noted that the significant unavoidable impact (SU) reported was a combined result of both construction and operational emissions. The bulk of health risks, including excess cancer risk and particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions, were primarily attributed to construction activities. However, when analyzing operational emissions alone, the risks were deemed less than significant with mitigation measures in place.

The council member expressed confusion over the implications of the findings, particularly regarding the thresholds for significant unmitigated impacts. Ms. McKellar clarified that while the excess cancer risk from the project was measured at 6.87—just below the significance threshold of 7—the PM2.5 concentrations were well below the established limits. This cautious approach was taken to ensure public health safety, despite the measurements not exceeding regulatory standards.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the city's commitment to environmental safety and health risk mitigation in construction projects. The discussions highlighted the importance of ongoing monitoring and the implementation of advanced technologies to further reduce emissions in the future.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal