In a recent San Francisco government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed project at 369 Valley Street that aims to raise and expand a historic earthquake cottage, sparking significant community debate over preservation versus development. The project, which involves elevating the existing structure by approximately 7 feet and adding a two-story rear addition, has drawn considerable opposition from local residents and preservation advocates concerned about the potential loss of the building's historical integrity.

The existing structure, identified as a Category A historic resource built in 1890, is composed of two earthquake shacks. The proposal requires a variance due to its encroachment into the required rear yard, which must maintain a minimum depth of 34 feet. Opponents, including adjacent property owner Mark Norton, argue that the project would drastically alter the character of the historic cottages and negatively impact light and air access for neighboring properties. Norton has proposed an alternative plan that would keep the cottages in their current location while allowing for a modest elevation increase, which he claims would better preserve their historical significance.

The planning staff, however, supports the original proposal, asserting that it meets residential design guidelines and preservation criteria. They argue that the project would improve compliance with rear yard requirements and that the cottages would remain recognizable despite the changes. The staff emphasized that the existing non-compliant rear portion of the building would be removed, which they believe enhances the overall integrity of the site.

Public comments during the meeting reflected a strong sentiment for preserving the earthquake cottages, with numerous letters submitted in opposition to the project. Preservationists highlighted the unique historical value of these structures, which are rare survivors from the 1906 earthquake and fire, and called for modifications to the proposal to better protect their integrity.

As the planning commission deliberates, the outcome of this project could set a significant precedent for how San Francisco balances development needs with the preservation of its historical resources. The commission is expected to continue reviewing the proposal, weighing the community's concerns against the project's potential benefits. The next steps will involve further discussions on the proposed plans and any modifications that may be necessary to address the preservationists' concerns.