The San Francisco Planning Commission convened on July 4, 2025, to address an appeal concerning a certificate of appropriateness for renovations at 945 Minnesota Street, a property within the Dog Patch Landmark District. The meeting highlighted ongoing disputes regarding the project’s compliance with local planning codes and its impact on neighborhood aesthetics.

Corey Teague, the zoning administrator, presented the case, emphasizing that the appeal focused narrowly on whether the proposed renovations adhered to the planning code and the Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation. He noted that the project had a complex history, including previous approvals and a variance that had been appealed and denied. Teague asserted that the current proposal was consistent with the necessary regulations and aimed to correct prior planning violations.

The appellant raised concerns about the project's compatibility with neighboring properties, particularly regarding an eight-foot addition that was deemed inconsistent with the surrounding architecture. The appellant requested the revocation of the certificate of appropriateness, arguing that it would further reduce the already limited mid-block open space.

During the meeting, commissioners expressed concerns about the implications of allowing the project to proceed, questioning whether it would reward previous non-compliance. Teague clarified that the goal was to ensure the project met legal standards and preserved the historic character of the building.

Public comments included mixed opinions, with some neighbors expressing worries about the potential loss of open space and the historical integrity of the neighborhood. Others supported the project, highlighting the need to rehabilitate the long-vacant units and restore the building's historical features.

After deliberation, the commission voted unanimously to deny the appeal, affirming that the certificate of appropriateness had been properly issued. This decision allows the project to move forward, with the planning department indicating that further appeals could arise concerning the associated building permit. The outcome underscores the ongoing tension between development and preservation in San Francisco's historic districts.