Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Building owner Christopher Neto challenges abatement order at San Francisco hearing

March 20, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Building owner Christopher Neto challenges abatement order at San Francisco hearing
The San Francisco City Commission convened on July 4, 2025, to address ongoing concerns regarding a property at 1-2 Bigger Street, which has been under scrutiny for significant maintenance issues. The meeting highlighted the city's commitment to ensuring public safety and property upkeep, as officials reviewed a series of violations and the subsequent appeals process initiated by the property owner.

During the session, city representatives presented a detailed case summary, noting that a notice of violation was issued in May 2022, followed by a director's hearing in January 2023. The owner was present at the hearing, where a seven-day order of abatement was issued due to outstanding issues related to the property’s condition. Despite an appeal filed shortly after, the commission has continued to monitor the situation closely.

The property has been reported to have multiple safety hazards, including unsecured roofing materials, peeling paint, and debris affecting neighboring properties. The Division of Building Inspection recommended upholding the order of abatement and assessing all associated costs to ensure the necessary repairs are made.

The property owner, Christopher Neto, along with his family and representatives, addressed the commission, submitting additional declarations and objections regarding the assessment of costs. Neto argued that the city failed to provide a timely assessment, which he claimed violated procedural rules. This objection was noted by the commission, which will consider the implications of these claims as they move forward.

The commission's decision to uphold the abatement order reflects a proactive approach to maintaining community standards and addressing safety concerns. As the situation develops, the city remains focused on ensuring that property owners comply with regulations to protect the integrity of the neighborhood and the well-being of its residents. The next steps will involve further review of the submitted objections and continued oversight of the property’s condition.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal