San Francisco's Land Use Committee made significant strides this week with the unanimous approval of two landmark designations and several proposed amendments to the planning code, aimed at enhancing the city's housing landscape.

The Grand Theater, located at 2665 Mission Street, received landmark status, a move introduced by Supervisor Ronan and backed by the Historic Preservation Commission. This 1940 architectural gem, designed by G. Albert Landsbur and Charles Lee, is recognized for its historical significance within the city's network of neighborhood theaters and as a prime example of the streamlined moderne style.

In addition, the Sacred Heart Parish Complex was also considered for landmarking, with discussions set to continue at a future hearing due to pending amendments proposed by Supervisor Peskin.

The committee also tackled the Family Housing Opportunity SUD amendment, which aims to adjust ownership requirements for properties with multiple units. Supervisor Peskin raised concerns about reducing the ownership requirement from five years to one year, emphasizing the need to retain existing regulations. Public feedback highlighted confusion over competing legislation, prompting the committee to continue discussions until February 26.

Further, Supervisor Peskin's state-mandated Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) controls were revisited, with amendments adopted to incentivize local ADU programs. These changes include retaining a two-ADU limit on hybrid units and expediting review timelines from 120 days to 60 days.

The committee also reviewed an ordinance regarding residential density in specific neighborhoods, with concerns raised about potential height increases for new developments. Proposed amendments aim to ensure that form-based density does not allow for excessive building heights and includes affordability requirements.

Lastly, Supervisor Peskin's ordinance to reinstate numeric density controls in downtown and Eastern Waterfront zoning districts was discussed. Amendments were made to limit the ordinance's scope and prevent large developments in historic areas. The committee voted to send this item to the full board with a positive recommendation.

As San Francisco continues to navigate its housing challenges, these decisions reflect a commitment to preserving historical significance while addressing the pressing need for housing development. The next steps will involve further discussions and public input as the city seeks to balance growth with community values.