Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council reviews $11.4M Trifecta contract amid billing dispute questions

April 24, 2024 | San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council reviews $11.4M Trifecta contract amid billing dispute questions
The San Francisco County government meeting held on July 4, 2025, focused on the ongoing discussions surrounding the Trifecta contract, which has seen significant financial changes since its inception. Initially valued at $5 million in 2021, the contract's total has escalated to $11.4 million by 2024, raising concerns about billing disputes and contract management.

During the meeting, a member raised questions regarding the necessity of extending the contract until December 31, 2024, despite the assertion that Trifecta services had not been utilized since May 2023. The discussion highlighted the need for clarity on whether the current request was to retroactively amend the contract or simply to finalize outstanding invoices.

A representative clarified that the original labeling of the request as retroactive was incorrect, as the contract had already been extended. The current request aims to increase the maximum allowable amount to settle past due invoices rather than to extend the contract's term. The representative emphasized that if the board approved the amendment, it would signify the end of any further financial obligations to Trifecta, despite the contract's technical duration still being active.

The conversation also touched on another contract with Cross Country, which had ballooned from $52 million to an approved not-to-exceed amount of approximately $80 million over two fiscal years. This raised additional questions about the management of large contracts and the expectations surrounding their usage.

The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for precise language in the resolution to ensure clarity regarding the termination of the Trifecta contract and the handling of past due invoices. Further consultation with the city attorney was suggested to finalize the appropriate wording for the resolution.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal