Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Hurst Avenue homeowners dispute deck permit at planning board hearing

January 31, 2024 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Hurst Avenue homeowners dispute deck permit at planning board hearing
Residents of San Francisco's Hurst Avenue are facing a contentious dispute over a proposed deck that could significantly impact neighborhood privacy and property use. During a recent city meeting, the Board of Appeals heard arguments regarding a building permit for a new 7 by 14-foot deck with a three-foot staircase at 525 Hurst Avenue, owned by Dana and her husband, Mr. Wong.

The appeal was filed by their neighbor, Daniel DeStefano, who expressed concerns about the construction's potential to infringe on his privacy and enjoyment of his property. DeStefano argued that the extensive excavation and construction work had not been adequately communicated to neighbors, which he believes should have prompted prior notification. He contended that the deck's placement would allow direct sightlines into his home, particularly affecting his bedroom windows.

In response, the Wongs defended their project, stating that the deck complies with city planning codes and has been approved by the Department of Building Inspection. They emphasized that their proposed deck is modest in size and adheres to required setbacks, minimizing its impact on neighboring properties. The Wongs also noted that they had made efforts to communicate with DeStefano about the project, but he remained unsatisfied with the outcome.

City officials, including representatives from the Planning Department and the Department of Building Inspection, supported the Wongs' position, confirming that the deck's construction was within legal limits and did not require additional permits for the patio work. They highlighted that the project had been reviewed multiple times without any violations found.

As the board deliberated, it became clear that the dispute centers not only on the deck itself but also on broader issues of neighborly communication and the interpretation of building regulations. The board is expected to make a decision soon, which could set a precedent for future residential construction disputes in the area. The outcome will be closely watched by both parties and other residents who may find themselves in similar situations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal