The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners faced intense scrutiny during its recent meeting on March 6, 2024, as allegations of bias and procedural misconduct were raised in the case against Dr. Ashley Watts. The session, which followed an executive meeting where no actions were taken, quickly escalated into a heated discussion regarding the fairness of the proceedings.

Dr. Gola, the board's general counsel, was called out for allowing testimony from a witness, Ms. Katiba, which Dr. Watts' counsel argued was improper and biased. The counsel contended that Dr. Watts was denied her rights to confront and cross-examine the witness, raising concerns about the integrity of the board's decision-making process. "This shows bias that you would allow her to do that," the counsel stated, emphasizing that Dr. Watts' rights were overlooked.

The discussion also touched on allegations that confidential information may have been improperly disclosed to a grand jury, further complicating the board's credibility. Dr. Watts' counsel claimed that this breach of confidentiality and the delay in proceedings—over eight months since the record closed—constituted official misconduct.

Despite the gravity of these claims, the board maintained that the focus should remain on the merits of the case, urging participants to adhere to the established procedures. However, the tension was palpable as accusations of bias and procedural impropriety dominated the conversation.

As the board continues to deliberate on Dr. Watts' case, the implications of these discussions raise significant questions about the fairness and transparency of the veterinary regulatory process in Texas. The outcome of this case could have lasting effects on the board's reputation and the rights of veterinary professionals in the state.