The Billings City Council held a work session on July 7, 2025, to discuss the potential reduction of council size, a topic that has sparked considerable debate among council members. The meeting began with an overview of the agenda, focusing primarily on the foundational question of whether to reduce the number of council members from the current 11.

Council members expressed varying opinions on the necessity and implications of such a change. One council member emphasized that the current size of the council is unwieldy, making it difficult to facilitate discussions and build cohesive relationships. They argued that a smaller council, potentially consisting of six members with one council member per ward and a mayor at large, would enhance efficiency and effectiveness in governance. This member noted that while the financial savings from reducing council size would be minimal—approximately $50,000 in a $450 million budget—the primary motivation for the change should be to improve the council's functionality and ability to lead the city.

Another council member echoed these sentiments, suggesting that the proposed reduction is not inherently negative but rather a necessary adjustment to improve operational dynamics. They acknowledged that the idea of change can feel uncomfortable, but emphasized that the focus should be on how to set the council up for future success.

The discussion also touched on the potential for growth in the community, with suggestions to incorporate triggers for increasing council size as the population grows. This forward-thinking approach aims to ensure that governance remains effective as Billings expands.

Overall, the meeting highlighted a critical juncture for the Billings City Council as it considers restructuring to better serve its constituents. The council plans to continue discussions on this topic, weighing the benefits of a smaller, more agile governing body against the historical precedent of its current size. Further deliberations are expected in upcoming sessions as council members seek to reach a consensus on the best path forward for the city.