Judge revokes Katrina Goodwin's probation for drug use violation in Bexar County

In a recent session of the 187th District Court, Judge Stephanie Boyd addressed significant matters concerning probation violations and sentencing, impacting individuals and the community at large.

One of the key discussions involved Katrina Goodwin, who faced a violation of her probation stemming from a 2017 theft conviction. Goodwin admitted to using amphetamines in January 2025, which violated the conditions of her probation. Despite the state’s recommendation to continue her probation with additional requirements, Judge Boyd expressed concerns about Goodwin's suitability for probation, citing her history of non-compliance and previous motions to revoke. Ultimately, the judge decided to revoke Goodwin's probation, sentencing her to four years in prison, along with a restitution order of $6,977.11 to U-Haul.

This decision underscores the court's commitment to addressing substance abuse issues while balancing the need for accountability. Judge Boyd acknowledged the challenges of overcoming addiction but emphasized the importance of utilizing available resources effectively. The ruling reflects a broader community concern regarding drug-related offenses and the judicial system's role in rehabilitation versus punishment.

In another case, Josephine Merquin faced a plea deadline but expressed uncertainty about her options. Judge Boyd clarified the legal process, explaining the differences between a jury trial and a bench trial, and emphasized the importance of making a timely decision regarding her case. This interaction highlights the court's efforts to ensure defendants understand their rights and the implications of their choices.

As these cases unfold, they illustrate the ongoing challenges within the judicial system, particularly regarding probation management and the complexities of addiction recovery. The outcomes not only affect the individuals involved but also resonate throughout the community, raising questions about support systems and the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs. The court's decisions aim to balance justice with the potential for recovery, reflecting a nuanced approach to criminal justice in Texas.