Santa Clara Council discusses related project amid calls for housing and retail expansion

In the heart of Santa Clara, city officials and community members gathered for a pivotal meeting on July 8, 2025, to discuss the future of local development, particularly the much-anticipated Related Santa Clara project. The atmosphere was charged with a sense of urgency as residents voiced their hopes for more housing, retail options, and improved public spaces.

One resident passionately emphasized the need for more housing, linking it to the city’s overall well-being. “We need housing,” they stated, urging council members to overcome concerns about costs and transportation issues. The call for collaboration resonated throughout the meeting, highlighting a collective desire for progress in the community.

Pat Nikolai, a former police chief and long-time supporter of the Related project, echoed these sentiments. He pointed out that the development, which aims to transform a former landfill into a vibrant area with restaurants and shops, could generate significant revenue—up to $126 million annually for local jurisdictions. “This funding is crucial for public safety and the future of Santa Clara,” he noted, advocating for the amendment that would enhance the project’s scope.

The proposed amendment also promises to increase affordable housing from 10% to 15%, a change that Dana Caldwell, a parks and recreation commissioner, described as “critically important.” Caldwell expressed enthusiasm for the project’s potential to create a new city park, which could serve as a central gathering place for residents.

As discussions progressed, the topic of retail options emerged. Residents expressed a desire for popular chains like Trader Joe’s and unique dining experiences, such as a sports bar near Levi’s Stadium. Edward, a local resident, highlighted the need for high-quality restaurants to attract visitors and enhance the area’s appeal.

However, not all voices were in favor of the development without reservations. Concerns about parking were raised by Mary Gilmore, who emphasized the need for solutions to ensure that new developments do not exacerbate existing issues in the neighborhood. “We want to make sure that the issue of parking is implemented in any future planning,” she urged, reflecting the worries of many residents who fear that increased traffic could disrupt their quality of life.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the future of Santa Clara hinges on balancing development with community needs. The discussions underscored a shared vision for a vibrant, accessible city, but also highlighted the challenges that lie ahead. With the council poised to make decisions that could shape the landscape of Santa Clara, residents remain hopeful for a collaborative approach that prioritizes both growth and quality of life.