[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6551627,"mediaKeyId","5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a","parentId",5331340,"title","Commission gives detailed feedback on multi-building apartment proposal; asks for more landscape, material variation and circulation detail","audioSeconds",390,"startMs",3246000,"endMs",3636000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a&start=3246&end=3636","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a/thumbnail_3246000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6551627/Ohio/Commission-gives-detailed-feedback-on-multi-building-apartment-proposal-asks-for-more-landscape-material-variation-and-circulation-detail","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6551627-e5c71d049cba78e3042a024998a251cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1776002355&Signature=btvzSC~ptKm8zZW~QYmKEzLoTabs18kHaDx8FY9NP3824usc-8eIYFcJ94YfYfCR0PB-UXb~ylM3FZLlLAtCRMb~whD4x-PmoEf8TlDIMWdXlD2wuczPi0PLazv6~Yxz~mgeL5txgJXUZ2Je0avsK6JhHqr51mMS5q~ytzUkh5Ch5-OuDr9AiUmN0z76n4N-pKrqVeEFroCKQ4eClw3zlt9QML8aq6s5Cob74TxLMAIH6X1CVEqvLJs9uht4l0YoQ5Dzu7lj3yMJnETZkh1hCvWRqC5YIfSshY-7PVEkPZ2hdbBkVKBvVOkciim2pBWl138eweVZW4pMziX9JhGyxQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Columbus","date","2025-07-09T09:32:47Z","article","A conceptual review of a proposed multi-building apartment development that would include two four-story residential buildings, surface parking and a pocket park drew extensive feedback from the Italian Village Commission. The design had been previously approved in concept (October 2023) but requires more detailed landscape, material and circulation information before advancing.

Staff summarized the project background and noted recent changes made after commission comments: expansion of the tree lawn, a pocket park between the buildings, and reduction of vehicular entrances. Commissioners requested more detailed landscape treatment along North Sixth Street and stronger screening of the surface parking so passersby do not view parked cars from the public right-of-way. Commissioners asked applicant teams for a complete planting plan (species, sizes and seasonal screening), a civil/engineering plan that matches the intended landscape changes and a clear indication that pavement removal shown in some engineering drafts should not be included (the commission emphasized that prior negotiations preserved the pavement connection for future consideration and that the engineering plan must reflect that agreement).

On the buildings, commissioners encouraged breaking up long facades with material and massing variation so the scheme does not read as monolithic. They asked for refined elevations and 3D context renderings that show the proposed massing relative to the immediate neighborhood (adjacent historic houses and more modern development). Commissioners suggested shifting some façade planes, creating recessed/forwarded elements, adding more trees within the northern portion of the parking lot, widening pedestrian entry paths to create a stronger arrival sequence, and providing seating and other amenities along walkways to break sidewalk monotony.

Commissioners discussed the breezeway/open passage condition: several recommended that main entries be made more legible from the street and suggested providing doors or a more articulated gateway rather than an open slot that reads as purely a pass-through. Staff asked the applicant to coordinate with the landscape architect to ensure the pocket park is finalized and to provide a full planting and engineering package for the next submission.

Because the item was conceptual, no action was taken. The applicant team agreed to return with a coordinated civil/landscape plan, material samples and contextual renderings showing the building in its block context and with the requested circulation and screening changes.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Special Meeting: Italian Village Commission (07/08/25)","oneSentenceSummary","Commissioners provided detailed guidance to the applicant for a proposed two‑building apartment development, requesting stronger parking screening, more trees and varied facade materials and asking that engineering plans reflect the agreed pavement retention.","taxTitle","Columbus City Council, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio","taxId",75950,"location","Ohio","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6551632,"Commission offers design feedback on proposed siding, trim and awning changes; no vote",876,2088000,2964000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a&start=2088&end=2964","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a/thumbnail_2088000.jpg","/articles/6551632/Ohio/Commission-offers-design-feedback-on-proposed-siding-trim-and-awning-changes-no-vote","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6551632-62da8910c29a18a02b4f7a2caf654790/orig.mp4?Expires=1776002355&Signature=NueqYvNk~qSqE-1KE6VfrZo97G9bhhaS1PeshBzs~9fZe1-eJoN0hdJIZQMJUuJwZ-9Nxdpaapec-x8xagEBVqVE3aiQnwJeDVh3nRp9vN09vHeFAe1KZ~MAH0WIA61Hu3xwD4R2W~x7SQQWUxbcSJnTTOv11psx2mMRwuUGe1Td-jFmVaQUG1jQ5n8ye3oSuzAul4OpTDf-EqpLr6uKUSS2kBEEyjaDz1Qht47SHSsJn0hbcD~1it4fqd-5yhAzY4ICO0r9-Fv~kblMd0zvpmMAc4Q7DNAZxHTaxYppE-jQUZkhy~6H17xXUgwgSxFGfPPvcUnZyYC-DjYTmRgy4w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners reviewed a conceptual application for exterior alterations to a historic residence that included removal of an existing rear stoop/portico, replacement of damaged siding and trim, and consideration of either a small awning or no awning. The applicant proposed using a cementitious/engineered siding and a manufactured Boral trim profile to match historic profiles; the applicant also proposed a black metal awning as an option to replace the existing stoop.

Staff briefed the commission and recommended that trim material match traditional wood types (cedar or southern yellow pine) where feasible and that an awning replacement should match the character, size and materials preferred in the Italian Village guidelines. Staff did not support full replacement of the existing stoop with the proposed metal awning without further detail because the proposed awning would not match the district’s porch and stoop guidance.

The applicant and their architect explained that the existing house has smooth-faced historic siding and that some available wood trim products on the market are rough-sawn or finger-jointed; the applicant said they preferred a smooth engineered product (Boral) because it more closely replicates the old-growth smooth profiles and performs better with finish coats. Commissioners expressed caution about mixing cementitious siding and engineered trim with original wood detailing and asked the applicant to provide additional samples, cut sheets for the proposed door, precise material specifications, and examples of the proposed product in local installations.

Commissioners recommended alternatives: (1) retain or replace the stoop with a wood-framed, historically proportioned element if any hood/awning is needed; (2) if the applicant pursues the engineered trim, provide detailed installation and edge treatment information to show long-term compatibility with lap siding; (3) submit clear color and door cut sheets for staff review. Staff noted Boral manufacturer guidance typically indicates cut-edge treatment is not required, and the commission requested documentation of installation details and real-world examples. Because this was a conceptual review, no motion was taken; staff and the applicant agreed the applicant would submit additional material samples and written details for a future business meeting review.","A property owner seeking to replace damaged siding and to remove/replace a rear stoop awning sought conceptual guidance. Commissioners and staff urged matching historic materials where feasible, asked for door cut sheets, and expressed reservations about a metal awning in place of an original wood stoop.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6551636,"Commission approves ground sign for church with landscaping conditions",683,1269000,1952000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a&start=1269&end=1952","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a/thumbnail_1269000.jpg","/articles/6551636/Ohio/Commission-approves-ground-sign-for-church-with-landscaping-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6551636-b787dc3c6c2eab5822c4c97acbd74223/orig.mp4?Expires=1776002355&Signature=RtQg0gXxlhAa~ShLqj52y~EILUUUQ2LgWzljA93vfl1ldpMmlukTzpoJiPZYRz-0~TjFJMinOwIhXbIXLdJJOa2f0-gcKnJRCpS1vaFvTF1Ib91MwH~ytNXPxst8H0pGwYSJuUtfpjhU-~IslmAbJ1uFMNB9Vb4E7jTAMLBtNFe3l6jrrPtZor7mBs-eCW1kuGiNEHlfSyaPKtlb8FJqfzbBGjxnmEooYGNxACNiDTzbNxCns~oLFLW8PONLZlXk2G20pXBCqlnDRGlXWr4dSXEHCwtC9r1vDNqwe7T6Yqkh62Gs9mZONvpaeJ1RvGWSC9qqWCBMdMRhF9ZpOrch5A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Italian Village Commission approved a ground-mounted sign application (COA2500587) for a property on East Second Avenue, permitting a 4-foot-tall ground sign with raised graphics on black posts, subject to a condition requiring additional landscaping and staff review of the final planting plan.

Staff's summary recounted the site’s signage history, noting prior directional signs installed in 2015 without commission approval and a 2015 COA for a larger wall sign. The applicant revised the current proposal after prior feedback and proposed a 4-foot ground sign in approximately the same location for visibility. Staff recommended the commission offer design feedback and forward the proposal to the next Administrative Board meeting with conditions consistent with the Italian Village guidelines for ground signs.

Commission discussion focused on visibility from Second Avenue, the sign’s proximity to the building, and buffering of mechanical equipment nearby. Commissioners supported landscaping around the base of the sign to make the sign feel appropriate for the streetscape. Commissioners suggested low-growing evergreen shrubs (for example, certain juniper cultivars) placed at the base and possibly some screening around mechanical equipment. One commissioner suggested painting the back of the sign black rather than leaving a blank white back.

The commission first moved the item from conceptual to action and then voted to approve COA2500587 with the condition that final landscape details (suggested: low evergreen shrubs such as C. green junipers) be submitted to staff for approval. The motion and second were recorded and the vote was taken by voice; the transcript does not record a roll-call tally.

The applicant accepted the landscape condition and agreed to coordinate final plant selection and height with staff. Staff will process the final planting specification under the condition placed by the commission prior to sign permitting.","The Italian Village Commission approved a ground sign (COA2500587) for a church/school site, contingent on additional landscape screening (low evergreen shrubs) and staff approval of final planting details.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6551640,"Commission approves exterior alterations, patio and landscaping at 345 E. Second Ave. with conditions",1091,136000,1227000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a&start=136&end=1227","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5331340-9839258f851f5740e6ed450b53d6617a/thumbnail_136000.jpg","/articles/6551640/Ohio/Commission-approves-exterior-alterations-patio-and-landscaping-at-345-E-Second-Ave-with-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6551640-a76d339f63de2e73ecf4967e58abed2a/orig.mp4?Expires=1776002355&Signature=CDyMAWB2RSrC0GOJ4mKmko~Y~Ftp4nutv4PDDjaF79BH4AVUhSL2bfBSuvGzSVxyDaJeqFbnseIAeDPSZNRS7h9V2H446oFxz9~A7zUj8~9a0qL5O7Tad1nF2lFg-FDa88JjOEH6zWGGXSawRvCK6qagUvkr1KjlHoD~OTi4r4rcJBiMom5SPlWG-jYNqP0T7O3dB06TBxJnaaxpIggFlgUR07qVnNJtna8tvnGOQvomX23MYvLUKstx~OMmhAJiCZvjV2GrwmEVcVhCgshmOBYYyk5aEwMuD7TnoBSisSQBGBQAgXv3pPXIPz9T2hIWSkD9ppUY0F4JDnlr89smaw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Italian Village Commission on July 2025 approved a certificate of appropriateness (COA2500598) for exterior alterations at 345 East Second Avenue, including enlarging an existing doorway opening, replacing a concrete patio, and repainting previously painted masonry, with conditions on landscaping and some construction details.

The commission's staff report said the proposed doorway opening would be restored to a historically larger aperture and that staff support the restoration and enlargement because the building is locally contributing within the district. Staff recommended approval subject to additional landscape permeability at the patio, removal of an unspecified “invitation ID” from the application, and compliance with applicable Italian Village standards (standards 1,2,3,5,6,9,10 and 12 listed in the staff report).

Commissioners asked the applicant to provide more detail on several construction items before final permits: lighting in the rear/parking area, the patio’s structural reinforcement, and whether an ADA ramp (if needed) would meet required slopes and details. Commissioners and staff recommended the patio include reinforcement (mesh or welded-wire fabric) and a permeable surface or perimeter planting to improve stormwater infiltration. Staff and commissioners also requested a clearer landscape plan that identifies species and sizes of proposed trees and shrubs and shows permeable planting strips along the fence line.

During discussion, commissioners suggested reducing the originally proposed 3-foot-wide gravel/permeable strip along the fence to 2 feet for cost and spatial reasons, and asked for caliper or container sizes for the three proposed trees (applicant noted 6-by-6 tree pits were shown on the plan). Commissioners also asked for detail on tree planting soils and root zone preparation to ensure the proposed trees will establish in compacted urban soils.

The commission moved and approved COA2500598 with the conditions that: (1) a revised landscape plan showing species and planting sizes be submitted to staff for review and approval; (2) the permeable planting strip around the patio be a minimum of 2 feet (up to 3 feet as proposed) and that additional permeable area be provided near tree plantings; and (3) the item identified as the invitation ID be removed from the application. The motion carried; the transcript records the motion, second and a voice vote but does not record a roll-call tally in the minutes.

The commission noted the application remains subject to standard construction review and required building permits; applicants were told to provide construction details for the patio slab (reinforcement and vapor barrier) and to verify ADA-grade measurements if an access ramp is needed.

The applicant was directed to work with staff on the detailed landscape submittal (species, caliper/size, planting soil amendments and final planting plan) so staff can process the conditioned approval.

The commission did not take up the related signage item for this same address at that moment; the building-alteration COA was considered and approved as described.","The Italian Village Commission approved a certificate of appropriateness to enlarge a storefront opening, replace a concrete patio, and make exterior repairs at 345 East Second Avenue (COA2500598), subject to conditions on permeable landscaping, tree planting details and removal of an invitation ID from the application.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission gives detailed feedback on multi-building apartment proposal; asks for more landscape, material variation and circulation detail

Commission offers design feedback on proposed siding, trim and awning changes; no vote

Commission approves ground sign for church with landscaping conditions

Commission approves exterior alterations, patio and landscaping at 345 E. Second Ave. with conditions