Chris Bridal argues for denied building application in Snowmass appeal hearing

Pitkin County officials are grappling with a contentious development proposal following a recent Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) meeting on July 9, 2025. The meeting centered around an appeal regarding a denied site plan application for a residential project on the west side of Snowmass Creek.

The applicant, represented by Chris Bridal and his team, argued that their proposed development is fully compliant with local regulations and that alternative sites on the east side of the creek are not feasible. The proposal includes a building envelope designed to minimize environmental impact, particularly concerning mature vegetation and wildlife habitats. The team emphasized that their plan would utilize existing infrastructure to limit tree removal and maintain the natural landscape.

Key discussions during the meeting highlighted the challenges of accessing the property. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has denied requests for direct access from Highway 82, complicating the development process. The applicant's team presented extensive documentation and expert analyses to support their case, asserting that the proposed site is the most viable option given the constraints of the land.

Concerns were raised by county staff regarding the environmental implications of the proposed development, particularly its proximity to riparian areas. The staff's recommendation for denial was based on the belief that alternative development options exist on the east side of the creek. However, the applicant's representatives countered that these alternatives would not meet necessary infrastructure requirements, such as water service and septic placement.

The BOCC engaged in a thorough discussion, with board members questioning the feasibility of the proposed site and the implications of the development on local wildlife and the environment. The meeting concluded with a motion to enter an executive session for legal advice, indicating the complexity of the issues at hand.

As the board deliberates, the outcome of this appeal could set a significant precedent for future developments in the area, balancing community needs with environmental stewardship. The next steps will involve further examination of the evidence presented and a decision on whether to uphold the denial or allow the project to proceed.