Bartlett residents oppose new Goodwill store citing local business concerns and environmental issues

In a recent Planning Commission meeting held in Bartlett, Tennessee, community members voiced strong opposition to the proposed opening of a Goodwill Thrift store in their neighborhood. The concerns raised by residents highlighted the potential negative impacts on local businesses, property values, and community safety.

The meeting began with a letter from local residents, including Glenn and Amy Brown, who argued that the establishment of a Goodwill store would detract from the unique character of their community. They pointed out that there is already a Goodwill store located just 2.5 miles away, making the new store unnecessary. The Browns emphasized that local small businesses are vital to the community, providing personalized service and reinvesting profits locally. They feared that a corporate-backed thrift store like Goodwill could siphon customers away from these businesses, leading to reduced revenues and potential closures.

Concerns about the store's environmental impact were also raised. Residents cited issues related to waste generation and sanitation, claiming that Goodwill stores have a history of accepting and reselling items that pose health risks. They expressed worries about the potential for infestations and the lack of transparency in Goodwill's disposal practices.

In response, Ray Couch, representing Goodwill, addressed these concerns, asserting that the proposed store would focus on collectibles rather than traditional thrift store items. He highlighted the organization's commitment to community employment, stating that Goodwill employs many individuals who face barriers to traditional employment. Couch also refuted claims regarding subminimum wages, insisting that their employees are compensated fairly.

Couch further defended Goodwill's environmental practices, explaining their recycling efforts and protocols for handling hazardous items. He assured the commission that safety measures are in place to prevent any health risks associated with the store's operations.

As the meeting progressed, questions arose about the store's layout and the amount of space dedicated to selling versus sorting donated items. Couch indicated that approximately 35% of the building would be used for retail space, with the remainder allocated for sorting donations.

The discussions at the meeting underscored a significant divide between community members and the applicant, reflecting broader concerns about the balance between corporate entities and local businesses. As the Planning Commission deliberates on the proposal, the outcome will likely have lasting implications for the character and economic health of the Bartlett community.