Union County's Board of Equalization and Review convened on July 9, 2025, to address significant property valuation concerns raised by local landowner, Mr. Simpson. The meeting highlighted ongoing issues related to floodplain designations and property tax assessments, particularly in light of recent heavy storms and hurricanes that have impacted the area.

Mr. Simpson presented evidence suggesting that the current FEMA flood zone maps, last updated in February 2008, do not accurately reflect the realities of flooding in his area. He argued that the maps are inadequate for assessing the risks posed by severe weather events, which have led to substantial crop damage and flooding beyond the designated flood zones. He requested a reassessment of his property, which includes 24.75 acres of land that he believes should be valued at $5,000 due to its unusable nature, given the steep cliffs and flooding issues.

During the meeting, Mr. Simpson emphasized that his property should be exempt from property taxes on the 5.35 acres of creek water, arguing that the land's value should reflect its actual usability. He contended that the county's current valuation of $378 per acre is unjust, proposing instead a value closer to $199.65 per acre based on comparisons with other parcels in the area.

County representatives responded by noting that Mr. Simpson's property is currently valued below the average price per acre for similar parcels in the New Salem area. They explained that the county uses FEMA floodplain data for assessments and that adjustments had already been made to account for access issues. The county acknowledged that the FEMA floodplain maps are undergoing updates, which could lead to future adjustments in property valuations.

The discussions underscored the complexities of property valuation in flood-prone areas and the challenges faced by landowners in navigating these assessments. As the county prepares for updated floodplain data, stakeholders are hopeful that more accurate information will lead to fairer property tax evaluations and better reflect the realities of land usability in Union County.