Isaac Vaez pleads in court on felony evading arrest charges

The Zoom meeting presided over by Judge Boyd on July 11, 2025, focused on the case of State versus Isaac Joel Vaez. The session began with the announcement of the parties involved, including Jason Garrett and George Phillips representing the state, and Mr. Vaez, the defendant.

Judge Boyd initiated the proceedings by confirming whether Mr. Vaez had received and reviewed all discovery materials with his attorney. Mr. Vaez affirmed that he had understood the application for deferred adjudication and the true bill of indictment. The judge then inquired if the defense counsel waived the reading of the indictment, to which the state confirmed they were proceeding as presented.

The judge explained the implications of the charges against Mr. Vaez, specifically that he was charged with evading arrest, a third-degree felony. The potential punishment was outlined, indicating a range of 2 to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Judge Boyd emphasized that if the court did not follow the plea agreement, Mr. Vaez would have the right to withdraw his plea without it being held against him.

Further inquiries were made regarding Mr. Vaez's understanding of his rights, including the right to a jury trial and the right to confront witnesses. Mr. Vaez confirmed that he intended to waive these rights and understood the consequences of entering a plea. The judge also asked if Mr. Vaez had been coerced or threatened in any way, to which he responded negatively, expressing satisfaction with his legal representation.

The court found that Mr. Vaez had knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial. The plea bargain included a recommendation for deferred adjudication with a fine of $2,000. The meeting concluded with the court's acknowledgment of Mr. Vaez's understanding of the plea agreement and the associated legal implications.