Board reviews proposed addition to lakeside home amid flood elevation discussions

The Adams County Board of Adjustments convened on July 12, 2025, to discuss a proposed addition to a residential property near Jordan Lake. The meeting focused on evaluating the potential hardship that the property owner might face if the addition were not approved, as well as the implications of the existing structure's proximity to the water's edge.

The discussion began with a review of the property’s elevation and historical water levels, noting that the lake had risen significantly during recent rains. Board members examined the drawings submitted by the property owner, which indicated the water's edge and the proposed location for the addition. Concerns were raised about whether the addition would meet the required setbacks from the high watermark.

A key point of discussion was the concept of "reasonable use" of the property. Board members deliberated on whether the proposed addition would allow the family to utilize the property effectively, given the current size of the house, which was described as having limited space for the family, especially during peak usage times with grandchildren visiting. The existing structure was noted to be approximately 24 by 40 feet, accommodating two to three bedrooms, which the owner indicated was insufficient for their needs.

The board also considered alternative options for the addition's placement. It was suggested that moving the addition closer to the garage could help meet setback requirements, but concerns were raised about maintaining adequate distance between the structures. The property owner confirmed that existing landscaping, including a row of pine trees, would remain intact, which could help mitigate visual impacts from the road.

Traffic patterns on the adjacent road were discussed, with board members noting that it primarily serves local residents and beachgoers, suggesting that the addition would not significantly alter the neighborhood's character.

As the meeting progressed, the board members weighed the potential hardship against the need for the addition, ultimately recognizing that the family's changing dynamics warranted consideration for the variance. The discussion concluded with a consensus that the proposed addition could enhance the property's usability without detracting from the surrounding environment.

The board plans to continue reviewing the proposal and will reconvene to make a final decision on the variance request in the coming weeks.