Lubbock citizens oppose UDC amendment 31 for larger garage signage

The Planning & Zoning Committee of Lubbock faced significant opposition during its recent meeting on July 25, 2025, regarding proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) that would allow larger signage on select parking garages. Community members voiced strong concerns about the implications of this amendment, emphasizing its potential long-term impact on the city’s visual landscape and public safety.

Opponents of UDC amendment 31 highlighted that the proposed changes could lead to uncontrolled content on signage, as state law limits the city’s ability to regulate what is displayed. This amendment would be permanent, remaining with the building regardless of ownership changes, raising fears about the types of messages that could be visible near Texas Tech University. Critics argued that this could negatively affect the community's aesthetic and values, particularly for future generations.

Additionally, speakers pointed out that the amendment could set a dangerous precedent by providing preferential treatment to a single business owner, undermining the city’s established comprehensive plan. They stressed that such a carve-out would disrupt the uniformity of signage regulations, which are designed to ensure orderly development across Lubbock. The sentiment was clear: allowing this exception could disadvantage other local businesses and create an unfair competitive environment.

Concerns were also raised about public safety, particularly regarding the potential distraction caused by large signs for drivers on nearby roadways. One speaker referenced past incidents where distractions from signage contributed to accidents, urging the committee to prioritize the health and safety of Lubbock residents over the interests of a single entity.

In conclusion, the committee is urged to reject the amendment, with community members advocating for a more equitable approach to zoning that serves the broader interests of Lubbock's 272,000 residents. The discussions reflect a strong commitment to maintaining the city’s character and ensuring that development decisions are made with the community's best interests in mind.