[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6174017,"mediaKeyId","5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3","parentId",5376350,"title","Directors debate tennis/pickleball reservation, access and monitoring; staff to draft plan and pilot options","audioSeconds",394,"startMs",10136000,"endMs",10530000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3&start=10136&end=10530","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3/thumbnail_10136000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6174017/Reston/Fairfax/Fairfax-County/Virginia/Directors-debate-tennispickleball-reservation-access-and-monitoring-staff-to-draft-plan-and-pilot-options","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6174017-1435fb9328ba8d3c9da7c4ea0b9d74a1/orig.mp4?Expires=1773592811&Signature=FxyXB3Fo8R9FjtUjbLOaQxNw~8-6CJCNb9kZTUOv14N9NKQ67pu53zVvftLqQBRTwxDN7WVqFjdHeDGDjGG3qLgT8E5WJaSHF3JfHv8ZvNIIvnEEFaTP~d-~PbzSy4NEsBhTgeTwPVdly~yULu4Wk9eotDEFEGvg6s4aU5p9vlvHuJjmcseH90TwhVpo3WU14DEbl4zpWha-HkYbh3DbWSivTjd8Lc0cmJpsr3xfYZ2TZxoJ982L-QpEl~chPZKhdAFdJmPrG4CnyuFxlcqgSy-mbpYRFDyDNRX1zSE6aPzF17v6NJDD499HNhECKz5zlyEGAyuGjh8Dq1bj031q-Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Reston, VA","date","2025-07-12T12:11:53.663Z","article","At the July 10 meeting board members debated three related proposals to manage court access and usage: gate/lock installations, monitoring systems to collect usage data, and a reservation system. The discussion focused on whether these measures would address non-resident use, heavy demand at pickleball courts, and enforcement challenges.
Staff said the objective behind the gate and monitoring items is to “know who's on the courts and how often people are using the courts.” Directors asked for clearer cost estimates and operation implications before committing. Staff noted the gate and monitoring proposals were intended to meet the same goal and that counts and per-location pricing would be clarified in the next budget packet.
Several directors voiced concern about a full reservation rollout. One director suggested a pilot limited to pickleball-heavy sites such as Autumnwood rather than system-wide implementation, and staff agreed to pursue a pilot approach and discuss operational options with the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC). Directors also raised the idea of a swipe-entry system to address non-resident usage; staff said a swipe solution could address access control but would require enforcement and monitoring resources.
No binding policy change was adopted July 10; instead, directors asked staff to return with a written operational plan that included a pilot proposal (site, rules, enforcement model and estimated costs) and to present the plan to PRAC for input. Directors stressed any reservation or gated access approach should include clarity on enforcement, signage, and how to handle nonmember users.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Work Session of the Board of Directors - July 10, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Directors discussed whether to implement reservations, swipe access or monitoring systems for courts and pickleball facilities. Staff recommended a pilot and to consult the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee (PRAC) on operational details; Autumnwood was suggested as a candidate site for a pilot.","taxTitle","Reston, Fairfax, Fairfax County, Virginia","taxId",3856,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6174022,"Board refers key election-rule changes back to Elections Committee; approves ballot procedures update",3129,11086000,14215000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3&start=11086&end=14215","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3/thumbnail_11086000.jpg","/articles/6174022/Reston/Fairfax/Fairfax-County/Virginia/Board-refers-key-election-rule-changes-back-to-Elections-Committee-approves-ballot-procedures-update","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6174022-e815ec59244e53af932ed081c65245aa/orig.mp4?Expires=1773592811&Signature=RpA6Dnz~KPEWy04M9lkdbCMz6-MxxwlR07O4LRDurIKbAD8-xf~dK7Ojrwt70Zw8nNBsu8Z~JtXAMPAcu-IoGY4mHIExfcRHxzF1AMNWgv5UX10dxJF81-~mEZ9TUbXdfF0ZBqELpsbk9DqtdCpu2d-dcuh9PGT7GTEyc9tvHmHtcJZ3tlYM65fRC3uULp-YEP2hvNbIE6wcDGKyi-vHzrVAGQNsFrptYCA06OmWgYcHgazBpTKBdUuwJImvYy~koq4Y3Fys0I8SFqjxIZYvkEPN6vojmJyKgY2D8AiS4Qbbwz4MdFcFsYssAGF7by4swP~RruyDa0nbiJJOLWquLg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the July 10 meeting the Elections Committee presented redlined edits to two governing documents intended to tighten candidate filing, residency verification and voting instructions. Katie Boswell, vice chair of the Elections Committee, summarized changes the committee had made to two resolutions: edits to candidate filing and campaign rules (Resolution 2) and clarifications on ballot instructions and tabulation (Resolution 4).
The committee’s proposed changes included adding a statement attesting to residency with a photo ID when filing, creating an appeals process for candidates denied certification, strengthening residency verification on candidacy forms, and clarifying instructions for both electronic and paper ballots.
Directors debated whether members — in addition to candidates — should have a short window to lodge appeals or challenges after the committee posts certified candidates. Concerns raised included compressed timeframes (the committee’s timeline requires quick certification to meet printing and mailing schedules), what constitutes “1 business day,” and whether staff or the committee should verify petition signatures. Several directors asked staff and counsel to clarify timelines and notice rules and to define the evidentiary standard for a member challenge.
After discussion the board voted to refer the candidate-filing redline back to the Elections Committee for further work (motion carried in a recorded vote). The board also separately approved the edits to the resolution governing voting forms, tabulation and reporting procedures (Resolution 4) so the clarified ballot instructions and tabulation rules could be implemented.
The board directed the Elections Committee to return with revised language that addresses timing and appeals mechanics and to document procedural steps for notifying candidates and members in writing. Committee and staff representatives agreed to include clearer definitions of appeal windows, notification methods (email for same-day notice), and the evidence threshold that should trigger the Elections Committee’s review.","The Elections Committee proposed redlines to two election-related resolutions covering candidate filing, residency verification, appeals and ballot instructions. The board referred one set of redlines back to the committee for further drafting and approved a separate resolution clarifying ballot types and tabulation procedures.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6174026,"Board reviews 42 budget suggestions; staff to price items and present prioritized list",163,8859000,9022000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3&start=8859&end=9022","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3/thumbnail_8859000.jpg","/articles/6174026/Reston/Fairfax/Fairfax-County/Virginia/Board-reviews-42-budget-suggestions-staff-to-price-items-and-present-prioritized-list","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6174026-9e640da1a4fdee0736af8c2914f19819/orig.mp4?Expires=1773592811&Signature=AFPrDAVisEdZLA1kfz1jZv0XeoUOtRIdTnMBTy56wQ2pbIAn6zLFmno8GG9nl~8b9GGVBP-Z9DNJV8JKP8~r7x0WMaT-mYh~~DbuQxbb00zr3tCFRVacCgW02LtyvqVPmMvgXoY7nJrkp-9sUNyC99FP4-q7JUcLMzoOAsozZQj1dUx4K6zMYAER9tPjsjepyc4HtvaT~zRVL~4Q5Dh3s2lurJYrUoiKOexTTxWytoCTn4xf45xtcoyLDoBTRsmFiDKKSd3yHNnl7BnOVQhd3XYG0bmMfU8jBn2~fsi9MwJ6X2eYMAFZ~6V2JGpOTGxfjRWajCAJoOzVEjaOXxKfyg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Fiscal staff told the board July 10 that 42 proposed budget suggestions had been submitted for pricing and committee recommendations. Staff said the board would not decide which items to fund at the July 10 meeting but rather would receive priced options and a staff/fiscal-committee recommendation to inform decisions scheduled at the July 24 meeting.
Budget staff (presenting as “Mr. Verne” in the public session) described the process used to estimate costs: the team relied on prior similar projects and departmental experience rather than soliciting vendor quotes for every line item. He said votes from directors on which suggestions to advance were due by July 14 so staff could assemble buckets and recommendations for the July 24 meeting.
Directors pressed staff for clearer classification of items that could be covered from ongoing operating funds versus those that would require new capital allocations. Staff agreed to flag items that could be covered from current operating budgets and to clarify full life-cycle or operations-and-maintenance (O&M) impacts. Examples discussed in detail included:
- Trash cans: staff listed $1,500 per decorative trash-can sleeve as a purchase/install cost; directors asked staff to add O&M costs (emptying/collection) to any estimate of net new recurring expense.
- Tennis courts: a pair of items — gate/lock installs and a court-monitoring solution — shared a common objective: understanding and controlling access and usage. Staff said the suggested equipment estimates are based on past purchases and that they will update counts (for example, number of gate locations) in the next draft.
- Condition assessment program: staff proposed $100,000 for the current tranche and an additional $50,000–$100,000 in 2026 to complete buildings, bridges and pools, noting courts could be the last tranche. Directors discussed treating the condition-assessment program as a multi-year initiative and aligning it with the reserve study.
- RA mobile app and website mobile optimization: staff indicated a CivicPlus mobile solution is available but that cost estimates were not finalized; staff promised a price for the next packet.
- Election vendor RFP: the committee reported an RFP issued June 16 with responses due July 14 and described a timeline to shortlist vendors in late July and hold demonstrations in August; the committee asked for an informational executive-session briefing before a contract is finalized (staff noted contracts under $100,000 do not require board approval, though the board signaled interest in an executive-session briefing prior to contract award).
Fiscal staff said some items would be deferred to later months (for example, pool items already funded in the prior year), and that staff would mark which suggested items were on track to be funded from existing operating budgets. Directors requested the next packet to include clearer columns for expected funding source (operating vs. capital), recurring O&M implications and precise quantities where estimates now use placeholders.
Staff will revise the spreadsheet and send a reminder to directors; the fiscal-committee column on the spreadsheet includes “yes,” “no” and “no opinion” indicators representing the committee’s review of member benefit. Directors said duplicate items (for example multiple kayak-storage requests) should be consolidated in staff recommendations.","Fiscal staff presented pricing for 42 budget suggestions and asked directors to submit preliminary votes ahead of the July 24 budget decision. Directors questioned assumptions about operating vs. capital funding, maintenance costs and several line-item estimates including trash cans, tennis-court equipment and a condition assessment program.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6174031,"Board directs counsel to seek PRC redline; assigns work on Reston National Golf Course",104,6951000,7055000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3&start=6951&end=7055","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3/thumbnail_6951000.jpg","/articles/6174031/Reston/Fairfax/Fairfax-County/Virginia/Board-directs-counsel-to-seek-PRC-redline-assigns-work-on-Reston-National-Golf-Course","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6174031-dedf6653be83056df6ab949f6397910a/orig.mp4?Expires=1773592811&Signature=lA9OlVJLr9PjDCRQWeQs18MRAf5B3LQ0-oGv9cFZiaJsJyoY7cPAy2RqNujOLrxrHbTzQao-40qlcz7fLKxPJ1ND36a~nHW26MOoqskI~B6GANx5wpSwNJ-TPI6h5d1nCndZTDpXmjRtd30cbHHvLDx8jSi7J6HRv8sfSmJp-WHvDAVUmhYGc0jppWWwF6vhSG-JCeBHZS~lSA5U~hFS6wqbFQ-dHSNETFBX0tiMyAokciZStpzGUTQBh2kPNWQ3btt-2zxJAOwAljiIZUn8dFvqCInuwGgCaXYdG3yQEpe5WEL3V2et0nM3DXY2zcyC1fet7IvQsh1E1fLtVy2k4A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Reston Association board reported after executive session that it had taken two distinct actions: it directed outside counsel and staff to engage Fairfax County staff on a proposed PRC amendment and to prepare a redline version of the amendment for the board’s review at its next meeting; and it assigned Directors Farrell and Joe Shuck to work with staff to determine next steps concerning the Reston National Golf Course.
President Johnson gave a public readout after the executive session, saying the board “directed the outside counsel and staff to discuss the PRC amendment consistent with the Board of Directors Executive Session conversation, to have that conversation with County staff, and also to prepare a red line for the board's consideration at the next meeting.” The board’s statement added that, on the golf-course matter, staff will consult with assigned directors to determine appropriate actions.
Board members who spoke during the executive-session readout emphasized that staff should aim for a submission and review process proportionate to the scope of any temporary or limited impacts. A staff speaker said brief, site-limited temporary installations (for example, a three-month bubble with minimal footers) likely would not require a full suite of large-project studies such as geotechnical or transportation analyses, but would need a PRC plan and site-appropriate materials.
No formal ordinance or final adoption occurred at the July 10 meeting; the board instead directed counsel and staff to complete draft redlines and to open discussions with county staff. Directors said they expect the redline and supporting staff recommendations to be available at the board’s next regular meeting for further public review and potential action.
Directors also named the two board members who will lead outreach with staff on the Reston National Golf Course item; staff is to report back with recommended action steps and any dependencies on county or third-party approvals.","After an executive session July 10, the board directed outside counsel and staff to discuss a PRC amendment with county staff and prepare a redline for the board’s next meeting. Directors were also tasked to work with staff on next steps for the Reston National Golf Course matter.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6174036,"Reston board interviews two volunteers; one appointed to elections committee",793,262000,1055000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3&start=262&end=1055","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5376350-255dfbce3971bc884702f2018f3399a3/thumbnail_262000.jpg","/articles/6174036/Reston/Fairfax/Fairfax-County/Virginia/Reston-board-interviews-two-volunteers-one-appointed-to-elections-committee","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6174036-3477b1983c57570f75a142f07b5c27e6/orig.mp4?Expires=1773592811&Signature=ggR91TrFtbQ74R-9hUd8b1Sv6J1VzPZVy8DpSwP9FHp7F~jMlNL4q7NP93nmdHpNUDdl7uCjB3AS8kzO15nyr~aLwfrXtWaM9fOYR3yCMuIR9f0OJ29MiTJgunAvnZtCTZwUqGUwAT-PVis-cxKsTOVpVg1K~mXqQyPXHI1u8x29NCyCgkSbbWtgtI~v--KSioeUN-E~BZGesTYl2W06NcgxgDUREQfYUdR5I13bPNsyxQkOR9Lqa6zg-2Dyce8qL506br-0uKv~pimyGlPUs3HmTWl2WqyfNt2a7kkHoGLfCs0-CdCb-d7iT67EntEcDsuLSvzdlaGmf6Ip1H1DpA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the Reston Association board meeting July 10, two volunteer applicants addressed directors about their qualifications and committee preferences, and one was appointed to a standing committee.
Wally Bloomfield, who introduced himself as a longtime Reston homeowner and retired finance executive, told directors he had prior experience with the Design Review Board (DRB) and said he would approach DRB issues “from a balanced perspective of the community.” Bloomfield described his professional background — including work with the National Security Agency, the U.S. Navy and roles as a finance executive and volunteer — and said his retirement schedule would let him visit sites day or night if needed.
Dorothy Hoffman, speaking from an online connection, said she has a background as an Air Force intelligence officer and experience with proposal writing and RFPs. She told staff member Britney that, because of limited mobility, she preferred the Elections Committee over Covenants because Elections work does not require on-site inspections.
The board discussed the two interviews during executive session and returned to public session to take votes on multiple appointments. Directors approved Dorothy Hoffman for membership on the Elections Committee. The motion to appoint Hoffman was made and seconded; the roll call showed seven votes in favor and one abstention.
Other committee appointments confirmed in the meeting included Karen Anton as vice chair of the Covenants Committee (motion carried with multiple yeas, one no and one abstention), Jalal Mpar as vice chair of the Legal Committee, and two members appointed to Friends of Reston for Community Projects, Inc. (Herb Williams Bafoe and Todd Zincola). Those appointments were made by motion, seconded and approved during the meeting.
Board members and staff thanked the applicants for volunteering and reminded both they would receive follow-up from staff about next steps. The board said volunteer applications would be discussed further in the second executive session and that applicants would be notified promptly of final outcomes.
The board’s volunteer-appointment activity followed the meeting’s earlier member-interview process and concluded with formal votes to place volunteers on committees.","At the July 10 Reston Association board meeting, two volunteer applicants — Wally Bloomfield and Dorothy Hoffman — spoke to directors about their backgrounds and committee preferences. The board later approved Dorothy Hoffman for the Elections Committee; other committee appointments were also confirmed.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Directors debate tennis/pickleball reservation, access and monitoring; staff to draft plan and pilot options

Board refers key election-rule changes back to Elections Committee; approves ballot procedures update

Board reviews 42 budget suggestions; staff to price items and present prioritized list

Board directs counsel to seek PRC redline; assigns work on Reston National Golf Course

Reston board interviews two volunteers; one appointed to elections committee