The North Dakota Supreme Court convened on November 28, 2024, to deliberate on the adoption case of H.W.L., focusing on the issue of parental abandonment. The court examined the circumstances surrounding the biological father's attempts to maintain contact with his children and the implications of his actions on the adoption proceedings.

During the discussions, it was noted that the father, referred to as CFR, had made efforts to communicate with his children, even resorting to contact through the mother's boyfriend. Evidence presented indicated that he had maintained some level of contact, including a visit in 2021 and attempts to provide financial support through child support payments. However, the court highlighted that CFR's efforts ceased, leading to a significant gap in communication.

CFR argued that his life circumstances, including the lack of a driver's license, hindered his ability to see his son. However, testimony from the mother contradicted this claim, revealing that arrangements had been made for the child to visit him in Bismarck. The court found that CFR's circumstances did not prevent him from maintaining a relationship with his son, as he had previously arranged visits and provided gifts.

The court emphasized that the determination of abandonment was not a matter of first impression and aligned with previous rulings in similar cases. It stated that the trial court's assessment of the evidence was not clearly erroneous, reinforcing the findings of abandonment based on CFR's lack of contact for 629 days and failure to provide child support or health insurance since 2018.

Ultimately, the North Dakota Supreme Court upheld the district court's decision to terminate CFR's parental rights, concluding that the findings of abandonment were supported by the evidence and that the decision was within the court's discretion. The ruling underscores the importance of maintaining parental responsibilities and the consequences of failing to do so in adoption cases.