Planning Commission evaluates oversized structure regulations for Hooper City housing

The Hooper City Planning Commission convened on July 10, 2025, to discuss several key topics regarding zoning regulations and conditional use permits (CUPs) for oversized structures and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). The meeting focused on potential changes to the current ordinances to better accommodate residents' needs while maintaining community standards.

The first item on the agenda involved a review of the existing regulations for oversized structures. Mike Sheldon expressed a preference for a numerical system rather than a blanket percentage for determining allowable sizes. The commission noted that neighboring cities typically allow for 25% of the rear yard to be used for such structures. The discussion included data from 2024, which revealed that only ten CUPs for oversized structures were approved, indicating a low demand for such permits.

Commission members debated the merits of a percentage-based system versus a fixed square footage limit. Some members suggested increasing the maximum size for oversized structures in various residential zones, with proposals ranging from 2,500 square feet for R-2 zones to 5,000 square feet for R-1 zones. The rationale was to provide more flexibility for property owners while ensuring that the structures do not overwhelm the residential character of the neighborhoods.

The commission also discussed the implications of these changes on ADUs, which are currently capped at 960 square feet for detached units. A proposal was made to increase the size limit for ADUs to 50% of the oversized structure's size or the primary dwelling's size, whichever is less. This change aims to address the growing need for affordable housing options, particularly in light of economic challenges faced by many families.

Throughout the meeting, members emphasized the importance of balancing property rights with community standards. They acknowledged that while increasing the size limits for oversized structures and ADUs could provide more housing options, it is crucial to implement safeguards to prevent potential overdevelopment and maintain the integrity of residential areas.

In conclusion, the Planning Commission agreed to draft recommendations for the city council, proposing increased size limits for oversized structures and ADUs. The commission plans to revisit these regulations periodically to assess their impact on the community and make adjustments as necessary. The next steps will involve preparing the proposed changes for a formal vote at the upcoming city council meeting.