Brooklyn Planning Commission revises oversized structure and ADU regulations

In a recent Planning Commission meeting held on July 10, 2025, in Hooper City, Weber County, significant discussions centered around proposed revisions to zoning ordinances and procedural updates aimed at enhancing the efficiency of the commission's operations.

One of the primary topics was the recommendation to revise the ordinance governing oversized structures and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Commissioner Prince proposed increasing the allowable square footage for oversized structures in various residential zones: 5,000 square feet in R-1 zones, 3,000 square feet in R-75 zones, and 2,500 square feet in R-2 zones. Additionally, the proposal included provisions for ADUs, allowing a maximum of 50% of the oversized structure's square footage for internal ADUs and specific limits for detached ADUs—2,500 square feet in R-1, 1,500 square feet in R-75, and 1,250 square feet in R-2 zones. The motion passed unanimously, indicating strong support for accommodating growing housing needs in the community.

The commission also discussed a comprehensive policy and procedure document that has been under development for some time. This document aims to streamline the planning process and clarify the roles and responsibilities of commission members. Key revisions included stipulating that nominees for the chair position must have served on the commission for at least one year and establishing a requirement for timely distribution of agenda items—specifically, that items must be added at least ten calendar days before meetings, barring emergencies. This change is intended to ensure that all members have adequate time to prepare for discussions.

Another important aspect of the meeting was the emphasis on transparency and communication within the commission. The introduction of a staff memo to accompany agenda packets was discussed, which would provide essential information regarding applications and conditions for approval. This memo aims to enhance the decision-making process by ensuring that commissioners are well-informed prior to meetings.

The meeting concluded with a focus on maintaining professionalism and clarity in the commission's operations, including guidelines for addressing members and handling conflicts of interest. These procedural updates reflect the commission's commitment to improving governance and responsiveness to community needs.

Overall, the discussions during this meeting highlight Hooper City's proactive approach to urban planning and development, addressing both current housing demands and the procedural efficiency of its planning commission. As these revisions move forward, they are expected to play a crucial role in shaping the future of the community.