Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

City of St Pete Beach declares chronic nuisance on property owned by Mr. Myers

July 14, 2025 | St. Pete Beach, Pinellas County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City of St Pete Beach declares chronic nuisance on property owned by Mr. Myers
In a pivotal meeting held on July 14, 2025, the City of St. Pete Beach took significant steps toward addressing a chronic nuisance property that has long troubled the community. Under the soft glow of city hall lights, city officials gathered to discuss the implications of declaring a property owned by Mr. Myers a chronic nuisance, a move that marks a first for the city under its newly amended code of ordinances.

The discussion centered around the city’s intent to utilize the chronic nuisance section of its code, specifically section 46-141, which addresses properties associated with ongoing criminal activity and other violations. City representatives emphasized the need for action, citing a history of code violations and the lack of a formal action plan from the property owner to remedy the situation. The city had previously issued a notice of nuisance to Mr. Myers, which outlined the necessary steps he needed to take within a specified timeframe to avoid further action.

Mr. Myers, who attended the meeting, has faced challenges in maintaining his property due to eyesight issues, which have hindered his ability to address the violations. Despite his efforts, the property has remained an eyesore, prompting the city to seek an abatement order. City officials expressed their frustration, noting that without a timely action plan from Mr. Myers, they had no choice but to pursue the chronic nuisance designation.

The conversation also highlighted the distinction between the chronic nuisance code and the nuisance abatement code, with city officials opting for the former due to its perceived strength in addressing the ongoing issues. This decision has raised questions among some attendees about the best approach to take, especially considering the potential for liens against the property should the city proceed with its abatement efforts.

As the meeting concluded, the city’s commitment to resolving the issue was clear. Officials reiterated their responsibility to the community, emphasizing that the abatement of the nuisance is not just about cleaning up a property but also about restoring the neighborhood's integrity. The outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for how similar situations are handled in the future, reflecting the city’s evolving approach to code enforcement and community standards.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe