[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6683764,"mediaKeyId","5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30","parentId",5383729,"title","Votes at a glance: Key outcomes from the July 14, 2025 New York City Council stated meeting","audioSeconds",100,"startMs",4502000,"endMs",4602000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30&start=4502&end=4602","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30/thumbnail_4502000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6683764/New-York/Votes-at-a-glance-Key-outcomes-from-the-July-14-2025-New-York-City-Council-stated-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6683764-c6b4e07ec0ad9acb0ab313dd7b897d33/orig.mp4?Expires=1770845550&Signature=eJSSzSXLznIQRbMGsM9O-qZNLgb2aYGMjIFLhwDMrhwfZ2xgwJb1UR~dfEDi8fCU1EjcB07npVNlXsoAQUoQC8atJUFslyM72JF5xiFJkeovx~TYFIzxUhgDLD57IuyzZeaKFRsK4TciHWoOGVpWu5LCdRLnM816fyl5JddvFlZuQRaiHeDNOdg7~OYIPGoVP-862E1uGzMgNVMBuvqUW930JQFKYttXG5r9fpsPJXX77Kn2QaWYnlFawDyFYmF2BijuIntkxOmDSkvz2SxKrrcBoMHmXOpnRpVuFb2XqQegPOSs51lpOuiEOlHXzLcAuyLlfKuHdG2RecPCw~9e~w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of New York, NY","date","2025-07-14T21:58:04Z","article","The New York City Council completed its stated meeting on July 14, 2025 and recorded votes on numerous land use items, introductions and resolutions. This summary lists key recorded outcomes as reflected in the council's proceedings and public roll calls.

- General orders calendar: Most items on the general orders calendar were adopted by a vote of 42 in the affirmative, 0 in the negative and 0 abstentions, with a set of specific exceptions noted below.

- Land use: LU 3-21, LU 3-22 and LU 3-23 (Bally's Ferry Point map amendment and related rezoning): Disapproval motion adopted by recorded vote — 29 yes, 9 no, 4 abstentions.

- Delivery worker package: Intro 11-33A (extend food delivery protections to contracted delivery workers) — adopted 35 yes, 6 no, 1 abstention. Intro 11-35A (minimum pay for grocery delivery workers) — adopted 36 yes, 4 no, 2 abstentions. Related items on tipping and pay timing (Intros 7-37A, 7-38A, and 8-59A) were adopted with recorded tallies reported in the council summary (for some, recorded tallies included 37–5–0).

- Deaths in DOC custody: Intro 4-23A — adopted 38 yes, 4 no, 0 abstentions.

- Other notable recorded introductions: Intro 10-20A (DOI/NYPD oversight reporting) — adopted 35 yes, 7 no, 0 abstentions. Intro 11-33A and Intro 11-35A tallies listed above.

- Resolutions: A number of resolutions were adopted by voice vote with \"the ayes have it,\" including Resolution 8-02 (Back Home Act calling on state action to assist tenants displaced by fire) and Resolution 5-60A (directing the Department of Investigation to look into 9/11 environmental toxin knowledge), among others.

This summary pulls recorded roll-call tallies and voice-vote outcomes from the stated meeting's proceedings. For full text of specific bills, introductions, or resolutions and the council’s official roll-call record, consult the legislative documents posted by the New York City Council.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","🔴 LIVE: Watch New York City Council's 7/14 Stated Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of recorded results from the council’s general orders calendar, including roll-call tallies and notable recorded outcomes for land use items and major introductory bills and resolutions.","taxTitle","New York City Council, New York City, New York County, New York","taxId",77593,"location","New York","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6683767,"Council backs \"Back Home\" tenant protections and state requests for fire-displaced residents",2959,1663000,4622000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30&start=1663&end=4622","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30/thumbnail_1663000.jpg","/articles/6683767/New-York/Council-backs-Back-Home-tenant-protections-and-state-requests-for-fire-displaced-residents","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6683767-827f9fe5cbefa561688868c8f8f81c2c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770845550&Signature=PQcqd58WRfEhEt7qlFnS7B2jBTxHOz0BYawVYfQGEo4ts1h9DrxDyKIrZWvKeqRsDxAdmefFn9D5VK0JJ-FyXk8ntuL4Z-NCblQtygiv2-gWnUYt-aGgsx1pnmGvIQZy4Dr4cqb-xH0hkDgE38Y17V6okf3TKtvkX4did0X8fVu4s0C-RBdigI-2xCJREdyA~3lz2LuDtyuGDw2cvfyuRc7-L6fP0QuGc0ga2cqxMKuQIq6ZGvUrGbSuFsyTA1OwMjTI9ZSSmBxlKAW-YY9YwSQRXSRD8HJyfMmEmFUXcH3oFECSaZ8tlJXw-C98ZXuaTkr5oIs3SLZYnsr39~swXg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The New York City Council passed a package aimed at strengthening support for residents displaced from their homes by fires and other emergencies. Resolution 8-02 called on the New York State Legislature and the governor to pass bills requiring the Department of Housing Preservation and Development to assist residents displaced by fire and requiring building owners found responsible for a fire that resulted in vacate orders to cover temporary apartment costs; the resolution passed by voice vote.

Speaker Adrienne Adams and multiple sponsors described the package as the \"Back Home\" Act. Councilmember Jennifer Gutierrez sponsored related measures aimed at limiting how long landlords can rely on loss-of-rent insurance payments without conducting repairs; Resolution 3-07 calls on the state to limit collection of loss-of-rent insurance payments without meaningful repairs to three months.

Other items in the package included bills to publish timing on Department of Buildings corrections, designate a single agency to provide centralized support to displaced residents and require HPD to relocate tenants within the same or adjacent community district upon request where possible. The council noted the measures are intended to provide clearer responsibility and coordination when residents lose housing due to fires or emergencies.

The resolutions and related local bills were adopted as recorded in the council’s general orders and voice-vote proceedings. Sponsors said the package responds to recurring issues faced by tenants displaced by emergencies and seeks to create clearer, faster assistance and accountability among city and state actors.","The council approved a resolution urging state legislation to require homeowner/building owner responsibility for temporary housing for tenants displaced by fire and passed a package of city bills aimed at assisting displaced residents.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":81,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6683769,"Council passes bill to tighten oversight after deaths in Department of Correction custody",2554,2068000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30&start=2068&end=4622","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30/thumbnail_2068000.jpg","/articles/6683769/New-York/Council-passes-bill-to-tighten-oversight-after-deaths-in-Department-of-Correction-custody","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6683769-db64c2960cf8177fbf9b48524f154b2a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770845550&Signature=GKPTPtHPjcMDOE-jVOdSrjS4YiAdcs6HGdzGjbegeLwQL11E74ZRwydcGOYMD5J5O9oNrL7zVxyrFdc24NR3Rsw5zuZyxGbgdhCXylWrmpRgdg5CU6Ujw8TmRIN7XKhYMx~8guBj5BGwUAhQgQHzcCdNJfU9o2uNy7WhNSxDWeFr~i021Nz2Zefe1tSb8u1ehdfuTQZGH55LD2NgFiF7U2hjwDPekPBesYC32Fy9Z2pG3FCswQn9l4FhsDUvUy-yf2g5AU2tq1C7nF7vcOelfB1C~fGBGnW79cUo9dXNZ--O47FJHGzOUJQtKYCrF3qM1edi8yGpH9GNrkRmqb4HbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The New York City Council approved Intro 4-23A, a bill that requires stronger oversight, transparency and procedures following a death in Department of Correction custody. The measure was adopted by a recorded vote of 38 in the affirmative, 4 in the negative and 0 abstentions.

Councilmember Carlina Rivera, sponsor of the legislation, said the bill was a direct response to families and advocates who described delays, lack of access to belongings, and secrecy around deaths in custody. Rivera told colleagues the bill \"will require stronger oversight, transparency, and accountability following the death of an individual in the custody of the Department of Correction,\" and called for a vote in favor.

The legislation includes provisions requiring agencies to issue death notifications, conduct investigations, provide updates on misconduct cases related to deaths, and issue recommendations to prevent further deaths in custody. It also establishes a jail death review board to examine systemic issues contributing to deaths in custody.

Supporters cited a pattern of families reporting difficulty obtaining information and the council noted that 41 people had died in DOC custody since the mayor took office, according to remarks in the meeting. Sponsors said the bill is intended to create clearer rules and restore trust by requiring agencies to provide timely information to families and the public.

Intro 4-23A passed on the general orders calendar with the recorded vote noted in the council summary.","The City Council approved Intro 4-23A to increase transparency, establish reporting procedures and create a jail death review board after deaths in city custody; sponsors urged accountability following families’ testimony.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6683770,"Council adopts package extending protections and minimum pay to contracted delivery workers",2482,2200000,4682000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30&start=2200&end=4682","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30/thumbnail_2200000.jpg","/articles/6683770/New-York/Council-adopts-package-extending-protections-and-minimum-pay-to-contracted-delivery-workers","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6683770-7fe4edde2e7dca950259b81fb8fd4cc4/orig.mp4?Expires=1770845550&Signature=fjqw67z8Y-L6fn4iBDOilUEmqbwmjv5gQkM97uA41trGARM6r3LEy-Mqb90dKGE~YfFFcNAO0a61DpFDBGNmN5h0m6l1jJsL-mUNeZU9ikQygoAHa-dfp5-W~PDbamV0fbXbE4H~2Fr6i3jODRzNaGzQLj-EF62toNamU1v-qN1Al0lM4v~FSqMJ9YqMKqS4WhwVMVaBLivdt4sQLQc1fsskFtQhWsp4Q~TU9E6UcC53lxAmk~~mb83EFhkf60dy7hQDtpGgRyyqKusooFubyZBVA~ikkQNDHfJrDWHtnQU5L4i4xit5heVLH6rx3WGVoVzX69T1Z9E9LqplWWAAzg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The New York City Council approved a package of bills aimed at expanding protections for contracted delivery workers, including grocery and third-party contractors. The measures were adopted in separate roll calls: Intro 11-33A was adopted 35–6–1 and Intro 11-35A was adopted 36–4–2; related bills on tipping and pay timing were also passed (recorded tallies for related introductions include 37–5–0 for some items).

Councilmember Sandy Nurse, sponsor of Intro 11-35A, said the bill \"ensures that grocery delivery workers, many of whom are supporting families, are paid the same $21.44 minimum wage as food delivery workers. This is about basic fairness,\" and described the prior exclusion of grocery delivery from earlier protections as a gap the council sought to correct.

Sponsors described the package as covering pay (a minimum rate for grocery delivery and a requirement that the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection study conditions and set rates compatible with grocery delivery), timely payment (requiring pay no later than seven calendar days after a pay period), pay-statement transparency (itemized written statements kept for at least three years), tips (requiring a tipping option at or before order placement and a minimum default suggestion), access to restrooms, distribution of fire safety materials, and a requirement to provide insulated delivery bags. The bills direct DCWP to study and, where applicable, implement minimum rates and other protections.

Supporters said the bills will raise wages and protect delivery workers from low pay and unsafe conditions; several council members thanked organized delivery workers and staff who drafted the legislation. Opponents recorded no single-line public quotation in the transcript excerpted for this article; roll-call tallies show divided votes on specific items.

Intro 11-33A (extending food delivery protections to contracted delivery workers) passed 35–6–1; Intro 11-35A (minimum pay for grocery delivery workers) passed 36–4–2. Other related bills on tipping and pay timing (Intros 7-37A, 7-38A and 8-59A) were adopted by recorded votes reflected in the council's summary of the general orders calendar.

The bills direct city agencies to set or study implementation details (for example, DCWP determining a minimum pay rate) and include reporting and recordkeeping requirements; the legislation affects third-party platforms and contracted delivery workers operating in New York City.","The New York City Council approved several bills extending pay, timing, transparency and safety protections to contracted delivery workers, including a minimum-pay proposal for grocery delivery workers.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6683771,"City Council votes to disapprove Bally’s Ferry Point map amendment, council split on economic promise",2258,2544000,4802000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30&start=2544&end=4802","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5383729-5079978a3280b46399a6633f9ad6fc30/thumbnail_2544000.jpg","/articles/6683771/New-York/City-Council-votes-to-disapprove-Ballys-Ferry-Point-map-amendment-council-split-on-economic-promise","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6683771-4f5d1ba001b31b13b505e781b69d8125/orig.mp4?Expires=1770845550&Signature=iYRn~rDkXCn4nyHalylS17MaKC-~1Zrtwvy~p-exBf1E7p~I9Q0NHfqeV7ytwmcVBEVTcCj12HFicuYdDlDLV2jCoe8JRLtc~kPF1lVdJj8oZCvAPPoTG4y-OFgQkzMpNCcJ1ZKxyvqDsR6dxim3nN7nefktoKvTKgjf4dMulfgOl7BQyhKpbuhJIVHj4TOgLFo6CsR4~L4RRfzWWIM63xBcaADUCbCdht6Nh2AeBp0I7JccaSLkHTU1q-lTQUwkByBmcRdOaR4G9AoxLxEmdfsS8rUn-UealJT-ngLCfDH-qusl4ass1IbYndtKrg8-c6c9uGYszJOxWrVftXdnDw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The New York City Council voted 29 in favor, 9 opposed and 4 abstentions on a motion to disapprove the Bally’s Ferry Point map amendment and related rezoning (LU 3-21, LU 3-22 and LU 3-23), effectively blocking that stage of the proposal from moving forward.

Councilmember Maritza Mamarado, who represents the district where the proposal was located, urged colleagues to block the project, saying, \"This is not real economic development. This is not housing, a hospital, or community improvements. It's a casino,\" and asked members to \"vote yes to disapprove this application and the proposal.\" Her remarks emphasized community distrust of the applicant and concerns about the timing and specificity of promised benefits.

Councilmember Rafael Salamanca spoke in opposition to the disapproval motion, arguing the borough would lose a chance for economic development. Salamanca said The Bronx has \"the worst health outcomes of all 62 counties in New York\" and warned that rejecting the application would deny the borough \"hundreds of millions of dollars in economic development and...community benefits,\" urging colleagues to \"please vote no to disapprove applications LU 3-21, 3-22, and 3-23.\"

The debate centered on competing claims about local job creation and long-term community benefit packages versus concerns about casinos’ impacts and whether the application included sufficiently specific commitments. No mover or second for the disapproval is listed in the record provided; the council recorded the final tally when the general orders were adopted.

The disapproval vote means the specific city-level approvals the applicant sought at this stage will not proceed. Council members on both sides repeatedly framed their positions as advocating for their boroughs and constituents: proponents said the proposal offered union construction and permanent jobs; opponents said community trust and concrete, enforceable commitments were lacking.

The council’s procedural record shows the general orders calendar was adopted with most items passing unanimously or by large margins, while LU 3-21, LU 3-22 and LU 3-23 were adopted (the disapproval) by a roll-call margin of 29 in the affirmative, 9 in the negative and 4 abstentions.

Planning, state-level licensing and any future applications remain separate from this vote; the city council’s disapproval at this stage does not itself grant or deny any state gaming license.","The New York City Council voted 29–9–4 to disapprove map and rezoning changes tied to the Bally’s Ferry Point gaming proposal after a heated debate over potential jobs and community impacts in the Bronx.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Key outcomes from the July 14, 2025 New York City Council stated meeting

Council backs "Back Home" tenant protections and state requests for fire-displaced residents

Council passes bill to tighten oversight after deaths in Department of Correction custody

Council adopts package extending protections and minimum pay to contracted delivery workers

City Council votes to disapprove Bally’s Ferry Point map amendment, council split on economic promise