[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,84,94,104,114],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":44,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6518875,"mediaKeyId","5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f","parentId",5385511,"title","Votes at a glance: Spring City council actions and approvals","audioSeconds",0,"startMs",2541000,"endMs","viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=2541&end=2541","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6518875/Utah/Votes-at-a-glance-Spring-City-council-actions-and-approvals","mediaUrl","author","Spring City Spring City Council","date","2025-07-10T19:00:00Z","article","At its meeting the Spring City council approved a series of routine and agenda items. Below is a concise list of motions that the council passed, with key details and vote tallies as recorded.

- Appointment: Adam Birmingham as assistant fire chief (to replace Bobby Olson). Motion moved by Paul Penrabinowitz and seconded by Marty McCain. Vote: unanimous (Randy Strait; Marty McCain; Ken Crook; Courtney Smith; Paul Penrabinowitz — all “yes”).

- Contract award: Rodriguez Painting selected for soffit and fascia repair/painting at $17,200 (city budgeted $20,000). Motion passed unanimously; the council added scheduling language targeting completion by approximately Sept. 15 and reserved the option to consider an alternate bidder if the contractor cannot meet the date.

- Watershed agreement (NRCS): Council authorized the mayor to sign the Spring City watershed plan and environmental assessment to complete the NRCS EA process and allow submission of the package to NRCS leadership in Washington. Motion passed unanimously; next steps include posting the EA and requesting funds for final design after NRCS review.

- Closed session: Council voted to enter a closed session to discuss litigation strategy (motion by Courtney Smith; second by Marty McCain). Motion carried unanimously; the council later returned to open session and announced the closed session had occurred.

- Financial approvals and routine minutes: The council approved the June financial report, authorized payment of bills, and approved multiple sets of minutes (June 5 public hearings and city council meetings, June 26 public hearing and special meeting). Each motion passed by unanimous voice votes recorded as “yes” from the council members in attendance.

- Adjournment: Motion to adjourn carried by majority voice vote; meeting closed after scheduling a work session on the sixteenth at 6:30 p.m.

Why it matters: The slate of approvals keeps city operations running — personnel, maintenance, grant administration and routine governance housekeeping. The council also preserved time to seek compromise on a pending zoning matter and flagged possible litigation referenced in public comment for further consideration.

Ending: These approvals were passed as recorded at the meeting. Items that remain open for future action include the zoning minimum‑lot discussion and the planning‑and‑zoning ordinance drafting process.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Council Meeting - July 10, 2025 Audio of City Council Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of formal motions the council approved during the meeting, including staffing, contract awards, grant agreement execution, routine financial approvals and minutes.","taxTitle","Spring City, Sanpete County, Utah","taxId",80056,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_46":80,"_48":49,"_50":81,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":82,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":83,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},6518880,"Council awards museum painting contract to Rodriguez Painting under budget",348,2195000,2543000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=2195&end=2543","/articles/6518880/Utah/Council-awards-museum-painting-contract-to-Rodriguez-Painting-under-budget","Spring City’s council voted to award a painting contract for exterior soffit and fascia work on a city‑owned building to Rodriguez Painting, whose low bid of $17,200 was accepted as under the $20,000 budgeted amount.

Council members said Rodriguez Painting had previously worked on town properties and received strong recommendations. Bids submitted included Total Coverage Painting at $38,154 and Hendrickson Painting at $31,622; Rodriguez’s $17,200 bid was the lowest. Council members included a schedule condition in the approval — if the contractor could not finish by a mutually agreed deadline (discussed in the meeting as near September), the council reserved the option to consider an alternate bidder.

Why it matters: The building, redeveloped and rededicated in recent years with help from the Friends of Historic Spring City and other donors, required repairs and painting to protect exterior wood and finish work.

What was decided: The city accepted Rodriguez Painting’s bid and approved the contract; the vote was unanimous.

Ending: Work will proceed under the contract terms and the city will follow up on scheduling and completion dates with the contractor.","The council accepted Rodriguez Painting’s low bid of $17,200 to repair and paint soffit and fascia on a city building; the amount is within the $20,000 line item in the budget and the council added a completion timeframe condition.",{"_33":85,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":86,"_41":87,"_43":88,"_45":89,"_46":90,"_48":49,"_50":91,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":92,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":93,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},6518886,"Council appoints Adam Birmingham as assistant fire chief; outgoing officer to be thanked",227,2045000,2272000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=2045&end=2272","/articles/6518886/Utah/Council-appoints-Adam-Birmingham-as-assistant-fire-chief-outgoing-officer-to-be-thanked","Spring City’s council approved appointing Adam Birmingham as assistant chief of the city’s fire department after Assistant Chief Bobby Olson asked to step down to a captain role because of other commitments.

Paul (council member) proposed the appointment and the council voted to confirm Birmingham. Councilmembers emphasized appreciation for Olson’s service and asked staff to include a letter of thanks in the appointment action.

Why it matters: The change keeps an experienced volunteer in the department’s leadership ranks while recognizing Olson’s request to reduce duties; the appointment maintains continuity in training and response capacity.

What was said: The council noted Birmingham’s contributions to training and recommended his elevation. A motion to appoint Birmingham passed unanimously.

Ending: Birmingham was appointed and Olson will remain active as a captain; the council asked staff to prepare a letter of appreciation.","Spring City council appointed Adam Birmingham to replace Bobby Olson as assistant fire chief; the council approved a letter of appreciation for Olson.",{"_33":95,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":96,"_41":97,"_43":98,"_45":99,"_46":100,"_48":49,"_50":101,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":102,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":103,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},6518890,"Council approves mayoral signature on final NRCS watershed agreement, advancing water project",291,2446000,2737000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=2446&end=2737","/articles/6518890/Utah/Council-approves-mayoral-signature-on-final-NRCS-watershed-agreement-advancing-water-project","The Spring City council voted unanimously to authorize the mayor to sign a watershed agreement that completes the environmental assessment (EA) required under a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) watershed grant.

A staff member told the council the NRCS grant is federal funding that has taken several years to move through cultural and environmental reviews. The city is the grant sponsor; Horseshoe Irrigation and Chest Irrigation are listed as co‑sponsors. Signing the watershed agreement will allow the EA to be posted on the federal website and the full package to be sent to NRCS leadership in Washington for final review.

The staff summary said it has been roughly six years since the grant award; signing the agreement is the last administrative step before the city can request funds for final design. Council members voted in favor and the mayor was authorized to execute the agreement that night.

Why it matters: The watershed project is intended to improve water retention, upgrade pipelines and canals, and build a reservoir; those improvements affect agricultural water users and municipal supply planning.

What happens next: After the NRCS chief signs the EA in Washington, the city expects to request funding for the design phase and proceed toward construction planning. No construction contract was approved at the meeting.","The council authorized the mayor to sign the Spring City watershed agreement required to complete the environmental assessment for an NRCS watershed grant; once signed and reviewed in Washington, the project can move to design‑funding requests.",{"_33":105,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":106,"_41":107,"_43":108,"_45":109,"_46":110,"_48":49,"_50":111,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":112,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":113,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},6518895,"Applicant seeks one‑block commercial overlay on Main Street; council discusses process and spot‑zoning concerns",394,1431000,1825000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=1431&end=1825","/articles/6518895/Utah/Applicant-seeks-oneblock-commercial-overlay-on-Main-Street-council-discusses-process-and-spotzoning-concerns","A local ATV repair and accessories operator, doing business as B and S Off Road Accessories, appeared at a Spring City council meeting to request expansion of a light‑commercial overlay to include property one block north of the existing commercial district on Main Street.

The business owner told the council he works on ATVs and similar vehicles — maintenance, stereo and exhaust work, shaft and axle work — and that the shop is in a garage adjacent to his residence. Planning and zoning had already reviewed the request and recommended moving forward to a formal ordinance change.

Council members discussed the scope of any expansion — whether to extend the overlay one block or to extend commercial zoning more broadly from the north end to the south end of the city. Council members repeatedly cautioned against spot‑zoning and favored a process that avoids giving one property a special advantage without broader policy justification.

Process and next steps: Planning staff (Cammy) said any proposed ordinance would be drafted by planning and zoning, posted for 15 days, followed by a public hearing before the council, and then the council could vote. Councilmembers agreed they would send notice to affected residents and seek input at a public hearing. One councilmember suggested limiting the change to a single block (to 600 North), while others urged consideration of longer‑term planning implications.

Ending: No ordinance vote occurred. Planning and zoning will prepare draft ordinance language and notify affected property owners for a public hearing at a future council meeting.","B and S Off Road Accessories asked the council to expand Spring City’s light‑commercial overlay about one block to include the applicant’s garage; planning staff will draft an ordinance and council discussed notice, public hearings and spot‑zoning risks.",{"_33":115,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":116,"_41":117,"_43":118,"_45":119,"_46":120,"_48":49,"_50":121,"_52":-5,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":122,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":123,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":72},6518900,"Spring City council delays minimum-lot vote after public objections and threat of litigation",2535,252000,2787000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5385511-1b102104d3ba535ec0f66a230b438c7f&start=252&end=2787","/articles/6518900/Utah/Spring-City-council-delays-minimum-lot-vote-after-public-objections-and-threat-of-litigation","Spring City’s council deferred action on a proposal to reduce residential minimum lot sizes after multiple residents urged delay and warned of legal challenges.

The delay followed a public comment from Tony Rudman, who said he and other residents own property affected by the proposed change and that a 54‑page complaint with more than 100 pages of exhibits had been prepared and was ready to file if the council voted to reduce lot sizes from roughly 1.06 acres to 0.5 acres. “Litigation is a slow, invasive, and comprehensive process,” Rudman said, and he offered a conditional proposal to enter negotiations during a “cooling off period.”

Council members said they would not take the item up that night and instead scheduled a council work meeting to try to find a compromise before a formal vote. Council members and staff discussed holding that work session on the sixteenth (time scheduled for 6:30 p.m.), and noted that any ordinance would need the usual planning-and-zoning drafting, 15‑day posting and a public hearing before a council vote.

Why it matters: Changing the city’s minimum lot size would affect single‑family property rights, future development patterns and neighborhood character across Spring City. Residents opposing the change said the numeric lot size is being used as a proxy for “heritage” and town character, while opponents of that view said heritage arguments do not map directly to arithmetic acreage.

What was said: Rudman, who identified himself as a property owner, told the council he and others were prepared to litigate and to pursue a referendum if the council voted to reduce lot sizes. Other speakers in public comment raised different concerns: Ryan Soon said he found heritage arguments offensive when they are tied to exact acreages, and Yvonne Wright urged the council to reject any multifamily or townhouse percentage allowances, saying “townhouses aren't historical or heritage.”

Council process and next steps: Planning and zoning staff and council members discussed options including limited rezoning, overlay districts and whether an expansion of a light‑commercial overlay would be handled separately. Council members repeatedly noted the need to avoid spot‑zoning and promised outreach to affected property owners. The council scheduled a public work session on the sixteenth at 6:30 p.m. to continue the discussion and gather more public input before any formal ordinance posting or vote.

Ending: The council did not vote on any zoning ordinance at the meeting. The discussion remains open; the council set a work session to continue negotiating possible compromises and to gather more input before moving forward.","Spring City council deferred a vote on changing minimum lot sizes after residents urged a cooling-off period and one speaker said a detailed lawsuit and a referendum were ready to be filed; the council scheduled a work session to seek compromise.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Spring City council actions and approvals

Council awards museum painting contract to Rodriguez Painting under budget

Council appoints Adam Birmingham as assistant fire chief; outgoing officer to be thanked

Council approves mayoral signature on final NRCS watershed agreement, advancing water project

Applicant seeks one‑block commercial overlay on Main Street; council discusses process and spot‑zoning concerns

Spring City council delays minimum-lot vote after public objections and threat of litigation