[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6171665,"mediaKeyId","5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2","parentId",5393735,"title","Court defers proceedings, places defendant on eight-year probation in injury-to-child case","audioSeconds",179,"startMs",2341000,"endMs",2520000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2&start=2341&end=2520","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2/thumbnail_2341000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6171665/Texas/Court-defers-proceedings-places-defendant-on-eight-year-probation-in-injury-to-child-case","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6171665-56ec8604d6f81327132360bc69ae721c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770450593&Signature=nGXotFXTJIgWXmEoChoE~RPUkUzvBNZLtDlGbh~wSl0GZ5T6zbXfEesP9~OapRfwLO7bQ0UqTjr8t6UVUvv262MO4uD1QQdCfRY844eVUQDKCbJxIBYSWCIFvfcBDn5aVv0Sl0TfhgfDLeL6YakTVl9E4aBD1L6o-ptwNndxEGHCCR7FbeOEl3oGAv7LMJlb4AteGqlSDcEb~XjsIzW42A9F~kP8snRTR~amBPSvIzi6Wpd4-pUYxtPUuPw4-VW2HQePLvKouYomfRXsdmZORsipRDeDDPzyJlV-DLXJhOv-Zn0Tae0uAlfO6yJUUc4G0pz-skZQLmceeHxprJ3Q1w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-07-16T03:31:36.177Z","article","The 252nd District Court accepted Daisha Mark’s guilty plea to a third-degree felony count of injury to a child, elderly or disabled individual and deferred adjudication, placing her on eight years of probation and ordering a $500 fine.

At sentencing the court confirmed receipt of the presentence report and that all parties had reviewed it. The judge explained that, under the plea agreement, proceedings would be deferred and Mark would be placed on probation with standard conditions and certain treatment and educational requirements. The court emphasized that successful completion of probation would result in dismissal of the case and no felony conviction being entered; the court also warned that any violation could lead to revocation and a possible prison sentence up to 10 years.

The judge instructed Mark to meet with probation to complete paperwork and to follow all conditions, including any programs and reporting requirements specified by probation. The court handed Mark the trial court certification showing the plea agreement and the waiver of certain appellate rights as part of that agreement.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Judge Raquel West's Personal Meeting Room","oneSentenceSummary","Judge accepted a guilty plea from Daisha Mark to injury of a child and deferred adjudication, sentencing her to eight years’ probation and imposing a $500 fine and probation conditions including classes and monitoring.","taxTitle","252nd District Court, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66306,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6171670,"Court orders drug-monitoring patch for DWI defendant after positive test",198,4172000,4370000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2&start=4172&end=4370","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2/thumbnail_4172000.jpg","/articles/6171670/Texas/Court-orders-drug-monitoring-patch-for-DWI-defendant-after-positive-test","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6171670-13d087ec85607a29e229134bbfa6406d/orig.mp4?Expires=1770450593&Signature=Maw8~rghZz9numNwBcNuw~p2T0SSB-pxIxj962fvJNwp8Zoms3eN5cTynyACsHqFQnjMS4HkyOxefIeoZWs0bnkE--ASYkn3pS1cWo0FZiCmJ1QjJo3CFdgdoqHTDyxTdJrJ53EpxqEHeJO6tIZMeCDFZavHNbxVoEHFU-CgX5k7pgyTHXmRTWwioUa8X9h5OOjVQtJMIRh755gwlm0r7r4Zi9DvzD7iTXZ9Ok0yH2HBWy3tcWs8VS7~nh6PWRmcaQFrxtNmXLJSK80p4xEFx7o2y2WGjKKDjEReFOOI5BcRDsONw0BU6PnFaH0SUzfB7-CSl3Jv795C1z5K84XBbw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A judge in the 252nd District Court ordered that Carly Davis obtain and wear a court-approved drug-monitoring patch after a pretrial test returned positive for THC, amphetamines and benzodiazepines.

The court told Davis the result raised concern because the probable cause affidavit alleged marijuana was found in her vehicle and she was awaiting trial on a third-degree DWI charge that included prior convictions. The judge set a strict condition: Davis must get a drug patch within 24 hours, show proof to her bondsman and counsel, and provide any prescriptions and pharmacy printouts that would explain positive results for benzodiazepines.

“If you have a prescription that’s gonna make you test positive for benzodiazepine or something like that, I want you to bring the prescription,” the judge said, directing Davis to the prosecutor’s office and her bondsman to get further instructions about obtaining the device. The judge warned that failure to be clean by the next court date could be a bond violation and result in remand to custody.

The court deleted a prior rejection entry for testing and gave Davis an additional reset to confirm compliance before moving the case to trial. The judge also told Davis to provide proof of the patch installation to her bondsman by the following day.","A defendant in a DWI matter, Carly Davis, tested positive for THC, amphetamines and benzodiazepines during court testing; the judge ordered a court-monitored drug patch to ensure compliance and warned positive tests could lead to custody.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6171675,"Judge suspends 10-year term, orders $13,114.93 restitution in criminal mischief case",425,5435000,5860000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2&start=5435&end=5860","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2/thumbnail_5435000.jpg","/articles/6171675/Texas/Judge-suspends-10-year-term-orders-1311493-restitution-in-criminal-mischief-case","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6171675-273fdc2bfb872bf12ddd5eb16397d14b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770450593&Signature=JDGDAY1XzlooVoo0Nn46tItWjEe0n2d1jOhjncGxB3k8fEN9JdrQgya3IxL-OL0sLR~jTq1XKLP1m-BgC~A8ONeBVCNbZ~pga6PWIFcpdQ1EXpGcqDjDTEz0AymtjoFa~qGRrvfIa0-rs8nuovtncP4b9Sdxh8bcW~dIUMDBO28jcNZ4XqZiRuXjDGyUl9FfDZM1Pbn4jlcHCwbQ3YJLO24oOj7YRC2xzZcbJ1iTc3IRBOHn6h8LZlzcs4nBJqzfz-uzz~9B~QJaRiMM6W~RB1ql1XN3OmLsAYkFstPnrj7XXEAHXWlg2DO4npmuHHUfhQ~mW2t6knjn5T3FQN7e7w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The presiding judge in the 252nd District Court found Leroy Smith guilty of criminal mischief and sentenced him to a 10-year term in the institutional division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice but suspended that sentence and placed Smith on 10 years of community supervision. The court ordered Smith to pay restitution in the amount of $13,114.93.

Defense counsel had urged leniency, citing Smith’s long-term employment and post-release stability; the state emphasized the seriousness and extent of damage in the offense and Smith’s prior criminal history. A victim statement and evidence submitted by Enterprise showed damage estimates the court treated as restitution. The judge said she considered both Smith’s rehabilitation since earlier convictions and the severity of the misconduct in arriving at a suspended sentence with substantial restitution.

Under the court’s order, Smith will be placed on a higher-caseload probation at the outset, must make regular monthly payments, and the court directed that at least half of any monthly payment go to restitution. The judge noted that if Smith complies with probation conditions his custodial sentence will remain suspended, but a violation could lead to revocation and imposition of the 10-year prison term.

The court also gave standard written admonishments about ineligibility to possess firearms as a result of the judgment and directed Smith to work with probation on a payment plan and reporting schedule.","In the criminal mischief case, the court sentenced Leroy Smith to a 10-year term but suspended it and placed him on 10 years' probation, ordering $13,114.93 in restitution and requiring a strict reporting level.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6171680,"Judge denies nondisclosure petition after fees remained unpaid",364,1786000,2150000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2&start=1786&end=2150","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5393735-fdec696eb4e99e987493846e6708dbb2/thumbnail_1786000.jpg","/articles/6171680/Texas/Judge-denies-nondisclosure-petition-after-fees-remained-unpaid","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6171680-2f628513dc3acdda77098cabb75913ee/orig.mp4?Expires=1770450593&Signature=fxIFJHLB7R8X3CH4gWaY77Fv3WLzcimpueX2oLrMTdhF9f9ir-~zCeEPPy8Dje3LnrbBKlzzeA0iYuLSVb0Lx-ReTCGVvpVDJ3G2YvloHbqHL2I~vDFi5vxl-eEm3-lYuAAecgf12dFFodBZaMx9xLGVOPQjmQmn99pKbVbqa-ibj6zj9vaFnWQ9cupmW1PPbu72jj6y3fQf9sA6BixrH5n2xXci6HGPzoHCvr3lm2OUez4V6m7HiURFPSFP-thqWgTju4~95dfPLKN8Mzii8ZJdbvDkZw29KiDQv1Li8SvfhIwvGpH1~KgPmPeuqG6pY1GikLH3y0aUnW3DyGc1qQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A judge in the 252nd District Court denied Jacaria Dudley’s petition for nondisclosure, saying the record shows required fines and costs were not paid and the relevant statutory conditions therefore were not met.

The judge said the court looks to the statutory requirement that community supervision be completed, “including any term of confinement and payment of all fines, cost, and restitution imposed,” and ruled that failure to pay prevented eligibility for nondisclosure. “Then I'm going to based on 411073(b), deny the petition for a nondisclosure in this case,” the judge said.

The court record shows Dudley filed a petition for nondisclosure in cause number 25CCC V0305 and the prosecutor indicated the petition was opposed because fees remained outstanding. The prosecutor and defense discussed which statutory section applied; the prosecutor cited provisions that, in the court’s view, require full payment of fees before nondisclosure may be granted.

The judge explained the office’s approach: where the statute specifically requires payment, a discharge from probation that does not include payment of fines and costs does not satisfy the statutory completion requirement for nondisclosure. The judge denied the petition on that basis and directed the clerk to prepare and file the denial.

The denial does not affect any other portion of Dudley’s record beyond the court’s ruling on the nondisclosure petition. The court instructed counsel to confer with court staff to process the written order.","A petition for nondisclosure filed by Jacaria Dudley in cause no. 25CCC V0305 was denied after the court concluded she had not completed conditions that require payment of fines and costs under the cited statutory provision.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Court defers proceedings, places defendant on eight-year probation in injury-to-child case

Court orders drug-monitoring patch for DWI defendant after positive test

Judge suspends 10-year term, orders $13,114.93 restitution in criminal mischief case

Judge denies nondisclosure petition after fees remained unpaid