Seattle City Council tackles graffiti taggers with new legislation amendments

The Seattle City Council convened on July 15, 2025, to discuss a series of amendments to Council Bill 120995, aimed at addressing the issue of graffiti tagging in the city. The meeting focused on the implications of tagging, distinguishing it from commissioned murals, and the broader strategy for public safety.

The session began with a statement emphasizing that the legislation is not about murals, which are considered art, but rather about tackling the problem of tagging that damages both public and private property. Council members expressed a unified concern over the blight caused by taggers in neighborhoods and the challenges it presents to community safety.

Council Member Rink introduced Amendment A, which sought to eliminate the requirement for taggers to demonstrate financial hardship before the court could convert monetary penalties into community restitution. This amendment was supported unanimously, highlighting a shift towards community service as a form of accountability.

Following this, Amendment B was presented, clarifying that graffiti taggers are liable for damages incurred by private property owners. This amendment ensures that property owners can seek restitution independently of any civil actions taken by the city. The council voted in favor of this amendment, reinforcing the rights of property owners affected by tagging.

Council Member Hollingsworth then proposed Amendment C, which aimed to promote community restitution by requiring taggers to participate in cleanup efforts. This amendment was also adopted, reflecting a desire to foster accountability and encourage behavioral change among offenders.

A technical Amendment D was introduced to address oversight in the legislation, ensuring that previous abatement efforts are recognized. However, this amendment faced some opposition due to its late introduction, with some council members expressing concerns about its implications. Despite this, it passed with a majority vote.

Throughout the discussions, council members reiterated the importance of distinguishing between illegal tagging and legitimate murals, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that supports community expression while addressing vandalism. The meeting concluded with a commitment to continue exploring ways to celebrate public art while effectively managing the challenges posed by tagging.

Overall, the council's actions reflect a proactive stance on public safety and community engagement, aiming to mitigate the impact of graffiti while promoting restorative practices. The next steps will involve implementing the amendments and monitoring their effectiveness in reducing tagging incidents across Seattle.