Representative Moulton opposes Coast Guard's plan to remove navigational buoys in Newburyport

In a pivotal meeting on July 15, 2025, the U.S. House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure convened to discuss significant amendments to HR 4275, focusing on maritime safety and navigation. The atmosphere was charged with urgency as representatives addressed the implications of a recent Coast Guard proposal to remove 350 navigational buoys across the Northeast, a move that has raised concerns among harbor masters and boating safety advocates.

Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts took center stage, expressing his apprehensions about the proposal, which he characterized as a cost-cutting measure rather than a genuine modernization effort. "Modernizing our maritime infrastructure is essential," Moulton stated, "but it must not come at the expense of safety." He highlighted the critical role that buoys play, especially for vessels lacking advanced GPS technology. For many boaters, these markers are not just navigational aids; they are vital lifelines in treacherous waters.

Moulton pointed to specific areas in his district, such as the mouth of the Merrimack River, where the removal of buoys could exacerbate the risks associated with boating in rocky and rapidly changing conditions. He called for a comprehensive, data-driven study to assess the necessity of these navigational aids before any decisions are made. "We need to ensure that we are not compromising safety for the sake of modernization," he emphasized.

The committee's discussions also touched on broader issues within the Coast Guard's contracting process, with Moulton advocating for reforms to ensure that contracts are awarded based on merit rather than cost alone. His remarks resonated with committee members, leading to a supportive response for his amendment aimed at preserving essential navigational aids.

As the meeting progressed, the committee voted in favor of Moulton's amendment, signaling a commitment to prioritize safety in maritime navigation. The amendment was agreed upon, and the committee moved forward with the amended version of HR 4275, which will now be reported to the House of Representatives for further consideration.

This meeting underscored the delicate balance between modernization and safety in maritime policy, a theme that will likely continue to resonate as discussions evolve in the coming months. The committee's actions reflect a growing recognition of the need to safeguard both the interests of boaters and the integrity of navigational systems as technology advances.