The U.S. House Committee on Appropriations convened on July 15, 2025, to discuss the Subcommittee Markup of the FY26 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Bill. The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding proposed cuts to housing and transportation programs, which many members argued would adversely affect vulnerable populations.

One of the primary issues raised was the proposed reduction of over $5 billion in funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rental assistance programs. Critics emphasized that this cut could lead to the eviction of hundreds of thousands of households, particularly impacting the elderly, disabled individuals, and families with children. The bill also proposes a 46% reduction in housing construction and preservation programs, which would eliminate initiatives designed to streamline housing development and potentially reduce the housing shortage of over 7 million units.

Further discussions revealed that the bill grants HUD broad authority to increase rent costs while simultaneously cutting programs aimed at helping residents achieve self-sufficiency and wealth-building opportunities. Notably, funding for housing counseling agencies in South Carolina, which assist many homebuyers, would be eliminated.

The bill's implications extend beyond housing, with significant cuts to public transit and Amtrak funding, jeopardizing necessary infrastructure upgrades and ongoing projects. Critics pointed out that these reductions ignore the pressing realities of climate change and infrastructure needs.

Members of the committee expressed frustration over the perceived contradiction in the Republican approach to federal spending. They argued that while claiming to address deficit concerns, the proposed cuts would disproportionately harm vulnerable Americans and exacerbate the ongoing housing crisis.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored a contentious debate over the balance between fiscal responsibility and the need to support essential housing and transportation services. The proposed bill, if passed in its current form, could have far-reaching consequences for communities across the nation, particularly in states like South Carolina. The committee's discussions set the stage for further deliberations as lawmakers consider the future of housing and urban development funding.