The Nevada Commission on Ethics convened on June 18, 2025, to address several key agenda items, including disclosures, ethics case considerations, and an operational report from the executive director.

The meeting commenced with Commissioner Yan disclosing a potential conflict of interest due to his partnership with the law firm McDonald Coronado, which represents a client, Mr. Rodriguez. To maintain ethical standards, Commissioner Yan announced his abstention from discussions related to Mr. Rodriguez, following consultation with Deputy Attorney General St. Jules, who confirmed the necessity of this disclosure.

Following this, the commission reviewed ethics case number 22-051C. It was noted that proper notice had been provided, and waivers received. The review panel, consisting of Chair Wallin and Commissioners Tauer and Sheets, was unable to participate due to prior commitments. Consequently, the remaining commissioners—Lowery, Gruenewald, and the chair—were eligible to vote.

No comments or concerns were raised regarding the written opinion on the case. The absence of Mr. Rodriguez and his attorney was acknowledged, with confirmation that the order had been publicly shared. Commissioner Lowery then motioned to approve the order, which included instructions for the commission's counsel to finalize the opinion and ensure proper service to all parties. Commissioner Gruenewald seconded the motion, and it was unanimously approved without opposition.

The meeting transitioned to the next agenda item, where Executive Director Arnstbaum was invited to present the agency's status and operations report, marking a shift in focus to the commission's ongoing activities and future plans.

Overall, the meeting underscored the commission's commitment to ethical governance and transparency, with clear procedures followed to address potential conflicts of interest and ensure fair deliberation on ethics cases.