Ashland City Council Revises Recreational Vehicle Storage Ordinance for Clarity

The Ashland City Council convened on July 15, 2025, to address a longstanding issue regarding the storage of recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers on residential properties. The meeting was prompted by a recent complaint from a resident who received a citation for storing a pontoon boat in his front yard for an extended period. This incident led to discussions about the clarity of existing ordinances and the need for potential revisions.

The council reviewed the current policy, which has been in place since at least the 1960s, prohibiting long-term storage of such vehicles in front or side yards, while allowing temporary storage for up to 72 hours. The policy aims to maintain neighborhood aesthetics and property values, as many residents expressed concerns about the visual impact of large vehicles parked in front yards.

During the meeting, it was noted that the language of the ordinance lacked specificity regarding what constitutes a trailer and whether boats fall under this definition. The law director's office and city engineer agreed that the language needed to be tightened to prevent ambiguity. The proposed revisions explicitly include "recreational vehicles, including watercraft, trailers for watercraft," thereby clarifying that boats are subject to the same restrictions as campers and RVs.

Several residents voiced their opinions, with some arguing that the ordinance infringes on property rights and personal freedoms. Others supported the need for regulations to prevent unsightly conditions that could detract from neighborhood appeal. The council emphasized that the intent of the ordinance is not to impose harsh restrictions but to protect community standards and property values.

The discussion highlighted a divide among residents regarding the balance between individual rights and community aesthetics. While some residents felt that their rights were being curtailed, others recognized the necessity of maintaining a visually appealing environment.

In conclusion, the council decided to move forward with the proposed language revisions to ensure clarity in the ordinance without changing the underlying policy. The meeting underscored the importance of community input in shaping local regulations and the ongoing challenge of balancing individual freedoms with collective community standards. Further discussions and potential follow-up actions will be necessary as the council continues to address residents' concerns.