Witness Testifies About Truthfulness and Privilege in Biden Deposition

In a pivotal deposition on July 18, 2025, Anthony Bernal, a key figure in the Biden administration, faced intense questioning from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform regarding the controversial Biden Autopen Scandal. The session began with strict reminders of the legal obligations to provide truthful testimony, emphasizing the serious consequences of perjury and false statements.

Bernal was asked directly about his advice to President Joe Biden concerning a potential pardon for his son, Hunter Biden. This inquiry highlights the ongoing scrutiny surrounding the Biden family's legal challenges and the implications of executive power in such matters. The committee's focus on Bernal's role suggests a deeper investigation into the administration's decision-making processes and the ethical considerations involved.

Throughout the deposition, Bernal affirmed his understanding of the rules governing the testimony, including the confidentiality of the proceedings and the necessity for complete honesty. The committee made it clear that any refusal to answer questions could lead to sanctions, underscoring the seriousness of the inquiry.

As the session progressed, the committee's approach indicated a commitment to uncovering the truth behind the Biden administration's actions, particularly regarding the use of the autopen for signing documents. The implications of this investigation could resonate beyond the immediate concerns, potentially affecting public trust in the administration and its handling of sensitive issues.

The outcome of Bernal's testimony and the committee's findings will likely shape future discussions about executive accountability and the boundaries of presidential power. As the investigation unfolds, the political landscape may shift, reflecting the ongoing tensions surrounding the Biden administration and its governance.