Mister Bernal Asserts Fifth Amendment Rights During House Committee Testimony

In a tense atmosphere filled with anticipation, the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform convened to hear the deposition of Anthony Bernal, a key figure in the ongoing Biden Autopen Scandal investigation. The meeting, held on July 18, 2025, quickly turned into a dramatic display of legal maneuvering as Bernal invoked his Fifth Amendment rights multiple times, refusing to answer questions that could potentially incriminate him.

As the committee members pressed Bernal for clarity, he consistently responded, “On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer the question pursuant to my Fifth Amendment rights under the constitution.” This refrain echoed through the room, underscoring the gravity of the situation and the legal implications surrounding the inquiry. Bernal's refusal to answer questions about his interactions with President Biden and the execution of presidential duties raised eyebrows and intensified scrutiny on the administration.

The committee's focus on Bernal stems from a broader investigation into the use of an autopen—a device used to sign documents—during President Biden's term. Despite the serious nature of the inquiry, Bernal's attorney emphasized that there has been no actual evidence of wrongdoing on his part, suggesting that the committee's pursuit of his testimony has been prolonged and perhaps unfounded.

Bernal, who has served in various capacities across three presidential administrations, including as assistant to the president and chief of staff to the first lady, expressed pride in his service. However, the committee's insistence on his testimony, particularly regarding allegations of misleading statements about the president's health, has placed him in a precarious position.

As the session progressed, the tension in the room was palpable. The committee members, eager to uncover the truth behind the autopen controversy, faced the challenge of navigating Bernal's legal protections while seeking accountability. The implications of this meeting extend beyond Bernal himself, potentially impacting the Biden administration's credibility and the ongoing discourse surrounding executive authority.

With Bernal's steadfast refusal to answer questions, the committee's next steps remain uncertain. The outcome of this investigation could shape public perception and political dynamics as the nation continues to grapple with issues of transparency and governance. As the meeting concluded, one thing was clear: the fallout from the Biden Autopen Scandal is far from over, and the quest for answers will continue to unfold in the coming months.