Green Bay City Council Considers Resolution to Ban Conversion Therapy

The Green Bay Common Council convened on July 15, 2025, to discuss a resolution aimed at banning conversion therapy, a controversial practice aimed at changing an individual's sexual orientation or gender identity. The meeting drew a diverse group of speakers, reflecting a wide range of opinions on the matter.

The resolution, which seeks to prohibit conversion therapy within the city, was met with both support and opposition. Proponents argue that banning the practice is essential for protecting the mental health and well-being of LGBTQ+ youth. They emphasize that conversion therapy has been widely discredited by mental health professionals and can lead to significant psychological harm.

Eric Chzwicki, a local resident, suggested that the council consider delaying the resolution until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of similar bans in other states. He expressed concern that moving forward prematurely could result in legal challenges that might burden taxpayers. Chzwicki also recommended amendments to strengthen the resolution, including clarifying language and incorporating religious exemptions to protect First Amendment rights.

Opponents of the resolution, including several local pastors, voiced strong objections, arguing that the ban could infringe on religious freedoms and the rights of parents to guide their children. Pastor Chad Hertler raised concerns about the lack of a clear definition of conversion therapy in the resolution, suggesting that it could inadvertently criminalize certain forms of counseling that align with religious beliefs. Other speakers echoed this sentiment, warning that the resolution could lead to further restrictions on religious expression and counseling practices.

Joshua Kunkel, another speaker, emphasized the importance of preserving therapeutic options for individuals seeking help, arguing that banning conversion therapy could set a precedent for restricting other forms of treatment, such as gender-affirming therapies. He called for a balanced approach that respects individual autonomy and the diversity of therapeutic practices.

The meeting also featured testimonies from younger community members, including a passionate statement from a local youth advocating for the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals. This highlighted the generational divide on the issue, with younger voices increasingly calling for acceptance and understanding.

As the council deliberates on the resolution, the discussions reflect broader societal debates about LGBTQ+ rights, mental health, and religious freedoms. The outcome of this resolution could have significant implications for the community, shaping the landscape of mental health care and the rights of individuals in Green Bay. The council is expected to continue its discussions and may vote on the resolution in the coming weeks, as community members remain engaged and vocal about their perspectives.