[{"_1":2,"_135":-5,"_136":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,87,99,111,123],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6509599,"mediaKeyId","5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab","parentId",5422820,"title","Votes at a glance: Mount Juliet Planning Commission, July 17, 2025","audioSeconds",13568,"startMs",720000,"endMs",14288000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=720&end=14288","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_720000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6509599/Tennessee/Votes-at-a-glance-Mount-Juliet-Planning-Commission-July-17-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509599-30f3afa03f7ddb0f16953d9ff5899121/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=Gkggh2bMAtHB4gHzsgHQq9KeM6oYIz9-KYTNfQFuq4iXOb47WaEEjSjgzbWqItCKby6ZNkV9~4~wQSLSVe3BwyqcD~azwT44zVwfyxzua9YHfPd7jjgcsZi5ptKVujXXmC9EuPrJYfLSAZS5nWfz1QrG-IErclamWD-ntJqK5fuOdVfgP21-pjnuLusRLBNs~jj~j5JrqQRn0DLzS1nPhp9lDbHdybknCohnv532sL1W~n5L1t-xTTJ52P9ti6R417MVyzIr3HHdytDjApd-KPZGae1KsbH5eLRUbPsiYtxs2VmEVLRJDcZmbe6R0b~se~P1n88GLm39k6-dkCEFLg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Mt Juliet, TN","date","2025-07-18T04:27:04.87Z","article","The Mount Juliet Municipal and Regional Planning Commission took the following formal actions on July 17, 2025. This roundup lists motions recorded during the meeting and the outcome stated on the record.

- Approval of minutes from May 15, 2025 meeting: Approved (motion and second; voice vote).

- Consent agenda (multiple development letters of credit releases, final plats and site reviews listed on the agenda items 6a'6w): Approved with staff recommendations (motion and second; voice vote). Items on the consent agenda included release of multiple development letters of credit (Baird Farms, Waltons Grove phases, Winfield phases, Waltons Grove sewer letters, etc.), review of multiple final plats (Waltons Grove Phase 7B; Elliott Reserve; Wintree Pines Phase 4B), and other routine plat and site items; staff recommended positive recommendation or approval for the listed items.

- Item 6m: Update to Article 4 of the subdivision regulations: Approved (motion and second; voice vote). This item had been previously recommended by the commission and was brought back for a vote.

- Item 6v / 9a: Reserve at Tate Lane (preliminary plat and final master development plan): Approved (final action recorded; see separate article).

- Item 6r (North Mount Juliet OPS-to-CTC corridor rezone): Negative recommendation (motion and second; vote recorded by voice; forwarded to the Board of Commissioners).

- Item 7a/7b: Sutton land-use amendment and preliminary master development plan (CMU PUD and RS-10 PUD): Positive recommendation with conditions, including tying land-use amendment approval to PMDP approval and additional staff conditions (motion and second; voice vote).

- Item 7c: Springs at Mount Juliet (RS-20 to CTC PUD): Negative recommendation (motion and second; forwarded to Board of Commissioners).

- Item 8a: 7 Brew site plan (drive-through coffee at 11226 Lebanon Road): Approved with staff comments (motion and second; voice vote).

- Item 8b: Industrial Drive storage (335 Industrial Drive, three-story self-storage): Approved with staff conditions (motion and second; voice vote).

- Item 9b: Broadstone at McFarland Farms Phase 1C (final master development plan/site plan): Disapproved (motion and second; voice vote). Commissioners asked the applicant to revise the plan to better align with the previously approved PMDP.

- Item 10a: Preliminary plat for the Scribe property off Renee Drive and Graham Drive: Approved (motion and second; voice vote). Staff noted project is within Metro sewer service area and subject to the city's new subdivision lighting ordinance adopted June 9, 2025.

Notes: Where roll-call tallies or individual yes/no votes were not read into the record, the summary above reports the outcome as stated by the chair after members signaled their votes. Several items had accompanying staff conditions or technical comments to be resolved at the final engineering or FMDP stage.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Commission | July 17, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Summary of procedural and consent votes taken by the Mount Juliet Planning Commission on July 17, 2025.","taxTitle","Planning Commission Meetings, Mount Juliet, Wilson County, Tennessee","taxId",69755,"location","Tennessee","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":46,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6509602,"Planning commission votes against Broadstone at McFarland Farms Phase 1C final plan",3457,10831000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=10831&end=14288","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_10831000.jpg","/articles/6509602/Tennessee/Planning-commission-votes-against-Broadstone-at-McFarland-Farms-Phase-1C-final-plan","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509602-e965f66f95839fe11b413838661ccd7a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=cVHzv~slqD32IF9PhkdJ3csfLEltXqSHLoEOQ0ceIhbB3I2Y0GX0K1ItSxp-MZoO-ren5PKwWU6RVnPBoDCqtounplfZ707nBJi793Da4n8ZFdQtwnHgdt8r4JIqn5UI3K4j-zZa9pyQNARforPvRPrAt~tBVSBT7-Ugt1cSl7AjI6bKrwYaFpUJzk54SYyLctioi~EJ~qFnhk68Vajg3c3w18dJKbIeUq4KfTr5~YL6CsXDPqY9AUuugLh-1KDx~bsjM8aUOsaAuWZGzF0NNPDMFuBTy7L8O1ojwGP883EI~fePECuwSMvT3L8wiIci37wfCBQK~91e2O7H5N~brw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Mount Juliet Planning Commission on July 17 voted to disapprove the final master development plan and site plan for Broadstone at McFarland Farms Phase 1C, the commercial/mixed-use phase of the larger McFarland Farms PUD.

Planning staff had presented the phase as substantially consistent with the previously approved PMDP in certain technical respects, but several commissioners said the final plan they reviewed did not match the vision shown at preliminary approval. Commissioners cited the appearance of larger, more monolithic multifamily buildings, different building footprints, and circulation and parking arrangements that, in their view, departed from the initial presentation.

Commissioners voiced concern that the final plan would present a more apartment-like façade to the main road and that the commercial frontage and public-space relationships shown previously were altered. Commissioner comments included requests for greater clarity on access between commercial and residential areas and better buffering and pedestrian connectivity.

The planning commission voted for disapproval; staff and applicant will need to reconcile the differences between the PMDP and the submitted FMDP/site plan before returning to the commission.

Why it matters: Phase 1C sits at a high-visibility location adjacent to Lebanon Road and the Mount Juliet Town Center area; commissioners said the look-and-feel and access arrangement matter for long-term compatibility with the rest of the PUD and the city's design expectations.

Next steps: Applicant will revise the final plan to address commission concerns and may resubmit for review.","Planning commissioners disapproved the final master development plan/site plan for Broadstone at McFarland Farms Phase 1C, noting that the final submission diverged substantially from the previously approved preliminary master development plan, particularly in the layout and the scale of multifamily buildings.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6509606,"Commission issues negative recommendation for Springs at Mount Juliet PUD after sewer and access concerns",634,8560000,9194000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=8560&end=9194","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_8560000.jpg","/articles/6509606/Tennessee/Commission-issues-negative-recommendation-for-Springs-at-Mount-Juliet-PUD-after-sewer-and-access-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509606-a5582403c4cd3be26d409b44390fabcf/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=jfaPPZLXEGh8hKl-ISVVfVNqph1DHW7If8b~K57yEIa~5vAq4ALPWPBt9F7au7IDKF79fe9mjssq661l9dF-1Wbemkuoq7O0xePUOre-TwR6uMJ7IZX~qDdZ1sJ~hQs1paOY7XQe3FwHSY3ZXBeEolEteGrNqBJB6uRrdDA6Go4PL7O1IK3ykYBfISxv~5TrqhPEAuEaC-f2qSVUgYlpvZc617OgGsTU1tbfL9RCmSjvKUWwTgwrFYsP4s2v8Un1Zm2bX7PXLPJnc7cPX8khqlJyrDwzLn2jBLC~9n6P1rkWbn8uNLKP6lesWMSZYNELcVfy4gThNEZXh9r80myUOQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Planning Commission on July 17 issued a negative recommendation for the Springs at Mount Juliet preliminary master development plan and rezone request from RS-20 to CTC PUD for a 20-acre site at 2937 Kurd Road.

Staff described the proposal as a mixed-use pod with roughly 158 townhomes and 36,000 square feet of commercial frontage on Golden Bear Gateway. Staff recommended a positive recommendation to the Board of Commissioners, but commissioners raised concerns about sewer routing, access and the heavy concentration of additional residential units in an area currently served by two-lane roads.

Shane (public works) explained the site's sewer must connect to Metro Nashville's system and that the on-site pump station would be public and built to city standards; he noted the proposal would route development flows through existing pump stations and gravity lines that cross multiple neighborhoods and asked for clarity on grinder pump use. \"For each grinder they use, a redundant grinder system will be provided to the city for future maintenance,\" Shane said as a condition staff would require if grinders are permitted.

Todd (transportation) highlighted access and off-site improvements, including the need for a left-turn lane on Lebanon Road at Kurd Road and potential widening; he also recommended that turn lanes be installed immediately and that the developer coordinate signal timing across nearby intersections to mitigate impacts. Commissioners expressed worry that existing two-lane roads could not absorb additional traffic from the development and suggested stronger buffering between the townhome and commercial portions.

Commission debate focused on sewer capacity and long-term traffic impacts on Kurd Road and Golden Bear Gateway. Multiple commissioners said the site was the wrong location for a dense townhome project where the surrounding area is largely single-family and where Golden Bear widening is not yet in place.

Commission action: the Planning Commission voted to forward a negative recommendation to the Board of Commissioners.

Next steps: the project record will go to the Board of Commissioners; staff and applicant will need to resolve sewer routing, access, and buffering concerns if the developer wishes to resubmit.","The commission voted to recommend denial of a 20-acre CTC PUD for the Springs at Mount Juliet (158 townhomes, 36,000 sq ft commercial), citing sewer routing and traffic capacity concerns and requests for more screening between townhomes and commercial uses.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6509611,"Planning commission approves final master plan and preliminary plat for Reserve at Tate Lane",295,9970000,10265000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=9970&end=10265","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_9970000.jpg","/articles/6509611/Tennessee/Planning-commission-approves-final-master-plan-and-preliminary-plat-for-Reserve-at-Tate-Lane","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509611-8bf9e8ef902b59e03b377ad0e69a4463/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=kZt56RApbw5WUmv0NZ9PVAFc-Q8YbhK97tAuZP96uhdjfpPp4FHUJVwMPK8vghy0TIcrYLbFDiCfI-CB6jU0QtbCq7dynDI8QA9HIK~DBq2DuKPeZZJUFpVKV6MtR4ojrBqDWytVOzsz2lzyL3bvgqmNsQ~o5lEG4LwyWzC8L-5tdum0NkF86wZVhbypF5le39b8PsboHfO0GnASFgxWo-7jODkV-pWjKyM2MMOnL91UYSxOqgrViToMxVUvf~H0uLB0FeQqmcrECCa1WYq7Fa9dAXW3wc6PnHfPD1RhCEjAlyFOWkaEzlGVObWE8PCicC5d47y9JywtsD4P-4c6Rw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Mount Juliet Planning Commission on July 17 approved the final master development plan (FMDP) and preliminary plat for the Reserve at Tate Lane, a single-family subdivision that was previously approved as a PUD by ordinance.

The project proposes 36 single-family lots across two build phases (21 lots in phase one; 15 in phase two) with about 2.94 acres of open space and a walking trail. Planning staff reported the FMDP is in substantial compliance with prior PUD ordinance 2530 and that the applicant has addressed the majority of staff comments; remaining landscape and technical comments will be handled during final engineering.

The commission approved an additional clarification requested by Commissioner Jones to allow an alternate location for a required sidewalk if the consultant and staff determine the alternate meets the substantial compliance requirement. The developer's representative said the owner wants the subdivision to be a high-quality addition to Mount Juliet.

Why it matters: The approval moves a previously authorized PUD to final engineering and permits the developer to continue into construction planning for 36 homes; staff and the commission emphasized remaining landscaping and engineering tasks at the FMDP stage.

Next steps: The applicant will complete final engineering and address remaining staff comments prior to construction permitting.","The commission approved the Reserve at Tate Lane final master development plan and preliminary plat for 36 single-family lots over two phases after staff confirmed the project complies with conditions of the previously approved PUD ordinance.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6509616,"Planning commission backs land-use amendment and preliminary master plan for Sutton mixed-use project with conditions",277,4309000,4586000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=4309&end=4586","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_4309000.jpg","/articles/6509616/Tennessee/Planning-commission-backs-land-use-amendment-and-preliminary-master-plan-for-Sutton-mixed-use-project-with-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509616-10676d7475cd02ca6f983e47d6353c33/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=SnndI615nRQCHYaMAiyVQ1GwxPQNyHGWEa0zmcLyuMqqPViAHThzzr~dPnlVXkMNipBEXNqonWcROchela2-uH~lBDjLC9yU7qbNIRZpOWyt1aJBJDslhS4AH6xUOq90OLi~M~JRwjv8AGdoqUFFrMBSObb226V7~Hby33W6nXCaGZqWYORJxNU48CatAPYAV4xh2p-QQ8RwZBwy3rxcvWCxmcZZPJ-X2bQBdCr3MyQjuW-5XgAS2fRpskh8ZPAIE50AV2C2JmT8JsQXr~2esTzp7D3FbY9FgIIQE0x56c1veBTXqNxdALmk78Z~yvga4N4KgdiCbTmx7Xbrjlr~qg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Planning Commission on July 17 gave a positive recommendation to a land-use amendment and the preliminary master development plan (PMDP) for the Sutton, a roughly 74-acre mixed-use project at the corner of Golden Bear Gateway and Division Street.

The commission considered a land-use amendment that would change a portion of the PUD's single-family component from mixed-use (CMU) to single-family residential to create a transition between higher-intensity uses on Golden Bear Gateway and existing neighborhoods. Sheree Akers of Barge Design Solutions, representing the applicant, said the site already has a mixed-use land-use designation and that the requested amendment applies to about 27.2 acres to accommodate detached single-family lots adjacent to existing houses.

John (city planner) told the commission staff endorsed the amendment and the PMDP in principle, noting the Sutton plan proposes about 102,000 square feet of commercial space, 649 residences across single-family, townhome and multifamily products, and a network of open space and pedestrian connections.

Commissioners stressed several details during their discussion: several asked the applicant to concentrate commercial frontage along Golden Bear Gateway and to maintain transitions (landscaping, setbacks) where residential abuts higher-intensity uses. Commissioner George said he supported the single-family transition, and other commissioners suggested an intergovernmental coordination approach as the development moves to final master plan stage.

The commission motion included a condition tying the land-use recommendation to approval of the applicant's preliminary master development plan (so the land-use change would not be detached from the PMDP), and commissioners requested staff follow up on the specific waivers and variances at final plan review. Staff recommended approval; the commission voted to forward a positive recommendation to the Board of Commissioners.

Why it matters: the Sutton project would add a sizable mixed-use corridor at a major gateway (Golden Bear Gateway), including hundreds of homes and public-space amenities; the commission emphasized phasing, access, and ensuring commercial uses are placed to limit neighborhood traffic and preserve transitions to existing houses.

Next steps: the project moves to the Board of Commissioners with the planning commission's positive recommendation and the list of staff conditions attached. Final engineering and site-level waivers will be handled at the final master development plan stage (FMDP).","The Planning Commission gave a positive recommendation to a land-use amendment and preliminary master development plan for the 74-acre Sutton project (mixed-use and single-family component) after staff and the applicant agreed conditions and phasing; commissioners asked that commercial frontage remain focused on Golden Bear Gateway.",{"_33":124,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":125,"_41":126,"_43":127,"_45":128,"_47":129,"_49":130,"_51":131,"_53":132,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":133,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":134,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6509620,"Neighbors oppose rezoning of North Mount Juliet Road corridor from OPS to CTC",1869,1502000,3371000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab&start=1502&end=3371","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422820-6c42637af6ad3d39ac2b313b2ac80fab/thumbnail_1502000.jpg","/articles/6509620/Tennessee/Neighbors-oppose-rezoning-of-North-Mount-Juliet-Road-corridor-from-OPS-to-CTC","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509620-6cd587290e968c1293f22d24f3ec6425/orig.mp4?Expires=1775331528&Signature=BXwN-~MoEhUOf8FeDenv3s3Acrp2RGfZH-WTN~b298126LwEBDoGqvEj2lgN8XnAeZsJuvuIKEUYQW3xSskvjShIf81LaJQ9jZNWTCmPkkH7KSeQofEuCkmeUn0x7P7ODGpOznlbzTOwKLl6to~e-M8a8gTUSHJ7JE9XvgKEkdYXCpJq0HOymVwmyG1XlJAD-9mdodGyvEzHF9-C9MhaKaVw0Y~ZMLMM4oTjwWKMNy39NHAWTLVgTJFPuAfgLAfwI6c-14a6rcDeSdlJbJNffq8b~lIWvy18fsJbXhCnHNTXq7HR677CLK7CPB~HBCi-g7gafBBo-6Td5W-0qrpGRQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Mount Juliet Municipal and Regional Planning Commission on July 17 issued a negative recommendation for a city-sponsored proposal to rezone roughly 13 properties along North Mount Juliet Road from OPS (Office Professional Services) to CTC (Community Town Center).

The proposal, sponsored by City Manager Kenny Martin, sought to align zoning in the corridor with the city's future land use plan, which lists the area as neighborhood commercial and permits CTC among other commercial zones. But neighbors and several commissioners said the corridor's proximity to schools and long-established homes makes higher-intensity CTC zoning inappropriate.

The commission heard a string of public comments from residents living directly behind the corridor, including Neeraj Patel and Keith Canfield, who told commissioners the strip abuts Barrett Drive and Clearview Drive neighborhoods and includes an elementary school and church. \"CTC will create a lot of crowd'and longer hours'that will affect peaceful living of the citizens,\" Neeraj Patel said. Several residents said they were not contacted in advance and described the area as an established neighborhood that should not be opened to high-traffic uses.

City Manager Kenny Martin told the commission he brought the idea to the planning body to test whether more restricted, high-end commercial uses could be facilitated in a way that still protects residents. \"Could we consider something like a restricted CTC that would allow a few more uses in?\" Martin said, noting past overlays used elsewhere in the city. He also said he would welcome the commission's guidance and called for a public, transparent discussion.

Commissioners debated the trade-offs: Commissioner George recounted past efforts to require large physical buffers (retaining mounds, 8'10-foot fences and landscaping) between older houses and adjacent commercial development, and emphasized the corridor's history and the neighborhood's vulnerability following severe storm damage years ago. Other commissioners said the land use plan already supports CTC for the corridor and pointed to similar zoning elsewhere along Mount Juliet Road.

Planning staff noted the request fits the city's future land use designation of neighborhood commercial, which allows OPS, CNS and CTC zoning. Staff recommended a positive recommendation to the Board of Commissioners, but after public comment and commissioner debate the planning commission voted to issue a negative recommendation back to the Board.

What happens next: the negative recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of Commissioners for its final consideration. The commission's action is advisory; zoning changes ultimately require Board approval.

Why it matters: the corridor sits adjacent to schools and long-standing neighborhoods. Residents said the change could allow drive-throughs, late-night uses and other commercial activity that would increase traffic, noise and light in a neighborhood they described as historically residential.

Commissioners, city staff and residents suggested follow-up steps including a public work session to explore tailored zoning tools (for example, a restrictive overlay or a new intermediate commercial category) and further traffic studies.

","Mount Juliet Planning Commission recommended against a city-initiated rezoning that would change about 13 parcels along North Mount Juliet Road from Office Professional Services (OPS) to Community Town Center (CTC) after residents raised traffic, noise and historic-neighborhood concerns.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Mount Juliet Planning Commission, July 17, 2025

Planning commission votes against Broadstone at McFarland Farms Phase 1C final plan

Commission issues negative recommendation for Springs at Mount Juliet PUD after sewer and access concerns

Planning commission approves final master plan and preliminary plat for Reserve at Tate Lane

Planning commission backs land-use amendment and preliminary master plan for Sutton mixed-use project with conditions

Neighbors oppose rezoning of North Mount Juliet Road corridor from OPS to CTC