[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6509587,"mediaKeyId","5422860-37e8fd7d61c1e95d711284c6cb77c752","parentId",5422860,"title","Chandler City Council unanimously approves consent agenda items 1–23","audioSeconds",30,"startMs",419000,"endMs",449000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422860-37e8fd7d61c1e95d711284c6cb77c752&start=419&end=449","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422860-37e8fd7d61c1e95d711284c6cb77c752/thumbnail_419000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6509587/Chandler/Maricopa-County/Arizona/Chandler-City-Council-unanimously-approves-consent-agenda-items-123","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509587-bdebf9df0a7cbf028c8139431fa9141c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442610&Signature=VppyOrlzTlUdxZd7gmidfRl4r9c2UJPZcptleO~9UyfiO3Yix5izFLfr1rPuYHGXXB3zfe2uw0e03P7HlNYjIx5JM0y9mDKOJBl8QWyvoifzFGNEIJbI2hQonbatmO1BP5it0OlkeehICgAXdB~FRZSIK6lk1pukBnSt55pdcMFsUMhPpr36N8hRpu4JI4vhiX09UtlcU4pcYD7myJ6lch8O5xliNfN0rVSSO8Z-x07WqGY6D2ZJjM9Uy0u9T~9P6pWJOgLaRq3~zEGnp-Y20WpRLKSd4Vnx3yygYnQaZZh5gLsugkai3sCuHgH5QmDyQDb2vUhVsronH2T8JT2dDA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Chandler","date","2025-07-17T20:55:18Z","article","The Chandler City Council unanimously approved the consent agenda covering items 1 through 23 at its July 17 regular meeting.

Council member Martin Martinez moved to approve the consent agenda; Vice Mayor Ellis seconded the motion. The clerk called the roll. Council members present voted to approve, and the mayor announced, \"Motion carries unanimously.\"

Those present for the roll call and recorded in the meeting were Mayor Hartke; Vice Mayor Ellis; Council member Encina; Council member Poston; Council member Orlando; Council member Harris; and Council member Hawkins. The meeting record indicates a quorum was present and that the consent agenda passed without recorded opposition.

The record does not detail the contents of items 1–23 in the transcript excerpt provided. No separate discussion or amendments to individual consent items were recorded in the supplied transcript.

Because the agenda items were approved on consent, no individual votes on those items were taken in the open discussion portion of the meeting as recorded in the excerpt.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Chandler City Council Meeting 07/17/25","oneSentenceSummary","At its July 17 regular meeting the Chandler City Council approved the consent agenda (items 1–23) by unanimous vote. The motion was moved by Council member Martinez and seconded by Vice Mayor Ellis.","taxTitle","Chandler, Maricopa County, Arizona","taxId",2211,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6509592,"Resident tells Chandler council police response to canal reports was delayed and records inconsistent",257,474000,731000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5422860-37e8fd7d61c1e95d711284c6cb77c752&start=474&end=731","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5422860-37e8fd7d61c1e95d711284c6cb77c752/thumbnail_474000.jpg","/articles/6509592/Chandler/Maricopa-County/Arizona/Resident-tells-Chandler-council-police-response-to-canal-reports-was-delayed-and-records-inconsistent","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6509592-593e04241e2286446bd25f8419cad071/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442610&Signature=b2VGZY0EDevV8wXIw2CuWzbfEQUvTkhCgq-nFnxFdmDFXLNteYPmxgGOJ2~g2KN62OmVVOJPV3~biHTILyDp3cUDnU0VNkjXxQEVBfMiCmHUXYDXtXtk0wnOiM6EM5s7B7HVdyRxj4Gf7Z3lz7k9ydazNMZJ8saQ4stFu8MKDGYIHSxbIQGU1kWGZutbv6kPNX5A8qytaXAZewVglxG-NZSRUSKguDELkxndpQ3qPOjWld9GY9P0ifZZEOIW5bO4GCMJ07tI7Axt5Cfti1h3OCOMgqdP~MmTYSqqSAioqL6PRw7ZMJhWk13HOXQ06nAKTFi5~V18epIpReGZXs3KbA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Brook Beal, a Chandler resident, told the City Council on July 17 that police responses to reports of violations along a city canal were delayed and that the city's call-for-service records do not match his account of events.

Beal said he notified police while walking on the canal near Pine Lake Park and recorded a sequence of texts and timestamps that he said differ from entries in the department's database. \"I arrived at, 04:24, let them know I had arrived. Call for service database says that someone arrived at 04:31, while I was sitting on the stone there on the bridge, and then I left 4 minutes later at or 3 minutes later at 04:34. Clearly, that's inaccurate information in the database,\" Beal said.

The discrepancy, Beal said, continued later in the week: \"On Tuesday this week, I sent 4 texts that only got 1 entry in the database. So the other 3 were ignored. They were never responded to, never entered in the database.\" He also said he requested guidance from the city attorney and had not yet received a reply.

The matter was raised during the unscheduled public appearances portion of the meeting. Council member Harris asked the City Manager to take a closer look and to continue coordinating city departments to address the issue. The City Manager responded that staff have been working across departments and that \"the next step in that process will be getting the subcommittee together to work on addressing this issue so that we have better answers for you.\" The manager also credited the assistant city manager, Ted, for work so far.

No formal motion or vote occurred on the public comment. The City Manager's statement constitutes staff direction to form an internal subcommittee to review reporting and response procedures and to return with follow-up information.

Beal named a specific location (the bridge at Pine Lake Park) and provided a sequence of times he says show delayed or inconsistent responses: he said he texted at 03:45, again at 04:04, arrived at the bridge and notified dispatch at 04:24, the call-for-service record showed arrival at 04:31, the sergeant was recorded as en route at 04:36 with an arrival time later listed as 05:08, and he received a phone call at 05:21. He asked the council for an explanation of the mismatches between his records and the department's logs.

Council members did not take formal action beyond asking staff to investigate. The City Manager indicated the subcommittee will be convened \"very shortly\" and will aim to provide direct answers. Beal's request for a response from the city attorney was noted but not resolved during the meeting; the record shows the attorney had not responded by the time of Beal's remarks.

The city did not provide a timeline at the meeting for when the subcommittee's findings or any follow-up guidance from the city attorney will be delivered.","At the July 17 Chandler City Council meeting, resident Brook Beal described delayed police responses and discrepancies between his timelines and the city's call-for-service database for incidents along a city canal. The City Manager said staff will convene a subcommittee to investigate and provide answers.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Chandler City Council unanimously approves consent agenda items 1–23

Resident tells Chandler council police response to canal reports was delayed and records inconsistent