Rhode Island Landscape Architect Proposes Development Plan Amid Community Concerns

In the dimly lit chambers of Smithfield's city hall, the Planning Board convened on July 17, 2025, to discuss a proposed residential development that has stirred both interest and concern among local residents. The project, which aims to introduce 48 housing units, has raised questions about its environmental impact, density, and the overall character of the community.

As the meeting unfolded, board members sought clarity on the project's footprint, with one member inquiring about the exact acreage designated for the housing units. The developer's representative acknowledged the uncertainty, promising to provide detailed land coverage calculations in future discussions. This lack of clarity has left some board members uneasy, particularly regarding the implications of placing 48 units on what could be as little as two acres.

Pamela Rogers, a landscape architect involved in the project, emphasized the importance of preserving the rural character of the site. She described plans for a walking path that would allow residents to appreciate the natural beauty of the area, which includes a brook and mature trees. However, concerns were raised about the proximity of the units to one another, with board members suggesting that increased separation and landscaping could enhance privacy and aesthetics.

Public comments added another layer of complexity to the discussion. Residents voiced apprehensions about the potential for increased flooding, given the area's history of water issues. One resident highlighted the lack of nearby recreational facilities and questioned how the influx of school-aged children would be accommodated in already crowded local schools. Another resident expressed fears about the safety risks associated with densely packed homes, particularly in terms of fire hazards.

The meeting also touched on broader themes of community development and the challenges of balancing growth with maintaining the town's character. Some residents called for a reevaluation of low to moderate income housing policies, arguing that the current approach may not be beneficial for the community as a whole.

As the evening drew to a close, the Planning Board thanked the public for their input, indicating that they would take the feedback into consideration as they move forward with the project. The developers are expected to return with a revised plan in the coming months, leaving many in the community eager to see how their concerns will be addressed. The outcome of this project could significantly shape the future of Smithfield, making it a focal point for ongoing discussions about development, community needs, and environmental stewardship.