[{"_1":2,"_121":-5,"_122":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,73,85,97,109],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":44,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":55,"_72":55},"mediaId",6164618,"mediaKeyId","5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe","parentId",5427009,"title","Commissioners deny temporary land‑use permit after applicant fails to appear for third time","audioSeconds",0,"startMs",8618000,"endMs","viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe&start=8618&end=8618","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe/thumbnail_8618000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6164618/Cobb-County/Georgia/Commissioners-deny-temporary-landuse-permit-after-applicant-fails-to-appear-for-third-time","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6164618-40f18207fd0eb773279946fff7b5b53d/orig.mp4?Expires=1774946189&Signature=gZP5En6yf~ov1M88IJE4KmwHpdhj9XHs8EFDN9hIAHHqPbu3lZtwFwHkugZEwM5ZE1Dh6yJTs9I~ekB-XtTwEy13KfuLksXQf7-N~erx5PXsnixewsdc-v7VfO4Sqag96QvM-10H4Avda3HYTFBvNspMijDlkLz633Js4~4FuZYSSOHtuAwQj25rvUBsf1g6nyHzTKM2NxPML6caz2c8P5BiZPicLS3VRS3bRonPFw8CUnr0Ouh-p-gmdr5FDcz77jXeJ5bSUzlATRyl0RbRW8RyKrfrR0EH3-mRK9Gbe5WCPgPUadiYcE6pB6TfwK2vKAo8y~Mm2cr4QZiq61n6yQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-07-18T21:07:39.237Z","article","Applicant absence leads to denial of temporary land‑use permit.

The Cobb County Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to deny LUP‑8‑2025 on July 15 after the applicant failed to appear for the hearing. Staff reported the applicant had missed the planning commission hearing and previous board hearing and had told staff she would not attend the present meeting. The board treated the absence as a basis to deny the permit.

Why it matters: repeated absence from required hearings prevents the board and staff from evaluating the applicant’s proposal and public concerns in person and is grounds for denial under the board’s procedures.

Details
- The applicant did not attend the hearing and staff said this was the second month the applicant was absent and that she had told staff she would not be present.
- A commissioner moved to deny LUP‑8‑2025 for nonattendance; the motion carried 5‑0.

Ending
The denial is final for this hearing; an applicant may reapply or request rehearing consistent with county rules, but the board’s action closes the matter for the July 15 docket.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Cobb County Board of Commissioners Zoning Hearing - 07/15/25","oneSentenceSummary","The board denied LUP‑8‑2025 by unanimous vote after the applicant did not attend the hearing; staff said the applicant previously missed the planning commission and earlier board hearings and notified staff she would not attend this meeting.","taxTitle","Cobb County, Georgia","taxId",3733,"location","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":74,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":75,"_41":76,"_43":77,"_45":78,"_46":79,"_48":80,"_50":81,"_52":82,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":83,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":84,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":55,"_72":55},6164623,"Board amends land‑use permit condition to limit disclosure of current unrelated occupants to zoning division",215,473000,688000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe&start=473&end=688","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe/thumbnail_473000.jpg","/articles/6164623/Cobb-County/Georgia/Board-amends-landuse-permit-condition-to-limit-disclosure-of-current-unrelated-occupants-to-zoning-division","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6164623-d93ee6b06dc316a26cf894d75ab9c9b9/orig.mp4?Expires=1774946189&Signature=g5LN9Wf8B~pdNLLrHo-o7IU72jXMd5a5Ybmj6oy1tMJ36QYkZ2nE3USsO0Ip5gAWIT8Tk2rUIEBFYxTr0MX9WbbeZ3hle1Y5jc3vYcNYCYQGN1cveuWqwOnpW3kUQjxPXEgCUGTTSW07-kQHMmiqAY3YOUt79UUAvS2lohVnCYFMuj-iv-F~VIv~RF0Hi8eD1TunCEBsV8pSQ~aRlIrh1wqlELhxRokGWMNjyJNQmUSOYWWKHGtFfvJVZcxwfT3egXelqeW-WQQ9n6PNTvsrpvVnfvl8pZBEJYp6XIVpX54fRmKbY0NvJKes1Wm0E2FT4NToZNyVmyFjX5qphO4NMw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners approved a temporary land‑use permit but removed a privacy‑related reporting requirement.

On July 15 the board approved LEP‑27‑2025, a temporary land‑use permit for a property on Tim Rose Road that would allow an additional unrelated occupant beyond what the code normally permits. The planning commission’s recommended stipulation had required the applicant to provide the names of the unrelated occupants to the zoning division manager. At the hearing commissioners questioned whether requiring names constituted an invasion of privacy.

Why it matters: the board altered the planning commission’s condition to avoid setting a precedent for naming private residents in permit conditions while preserving a time‑limited approval that addresses the planning commission’s concern about the specific, currently‑present unrelated occupants.

Most important details
- Zoning manager John Peterson confirmed the planning commission had added the condition because the unrelated occupants were students at Kennesaw State University and planning commissioners sought to limit the permit duration until the students graduate.
- A commissioner argued a stipulation requiring names be submitted to the zoning manager “is a bit of overreach…a complete invasion of privacy.” The board asked the applicant if they would accept a modified condition limiting the permit to the “two current unrelated” occupants for 12 months; the applicant agreed.
- The revised condition was accepted and the consent agenda — including LEP‑27 and two other consent items — passed on a 5‑0 vote.

Supporting details and background
The planning commission recommended approval of LEP‑27 for 12 months with three conditions: allowing one extra unrelated person, providing the names of the two unrelated persons to the zoning manager, and compliance with Cobb DOT comments (no parking in the right of way). At the hearing, board members expressed concern about requiring names; staff indicated it was a planning commission condition and that staff would not object to removing the naming requirement. The board modified condition 2 to state the permit applies to the two unrelated people currently occupying the property for the 12‑month period.

Board action and next steps
The consent agenda, as revised, was approved unanimously. The modified LEP‑27 approval allows the extra unrelated person(s) for 12 months and requires the applicant to return for renewal if they wish to continue the arrangement beyond that period. The record indicates the board intended to avoid a precedent of listing residents’ names in a zoning condition.

Sources and attribution
This article draws on in‑hearing statements by John Peterson (zoning manager) and comments recorded from commissioners and the applicant.","During the consent agenda the board approved a temporary land‑use permit (LEP 27) but removed a requirement that the applicant provide the names of unrelated occupants to the zoning manager; the permit was modified to apply to the two current unrelated occupants for 12 months instead of requiring names be reported.",{"_33":86,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":87,"_41":88,"_43":89,"_45":90,"_46":91,"_48":92,"_50":93,"_52":94,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":95,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":96,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":55,"_72":55},6164628,"Panel approves 300‑unit Cumberland redevelopment despite school district concerns; stipulation limits two‑bedroom units",1524,7091000,8615000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe&start=7091&end=8615","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe/thumbnail_7091000.jpg","/articles/6164628/Cobb-County/Georgia/Panel-approves-300unit-Cumberland-redevelopment-despite-school-district-concerns-stipulation-limits-twobedroom-units","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6164628-c14ea30d5989845fa579c91677c9e2d5/orig.mp4?Expires=1774946189&Signature=L6tKdXVUgU97PS0j4VXbmoMxb5wPdAe4Cg~56BMPSbo-xRaZ9ScZwDkZy8oys9jEnFGXQzeEMbe~KvVId6RL7dfBBJWzARNiDbG1HN3JpY~7UQlwZ6XiUBrIFDMPnTxCdgM4y0NGMRwbClBdo89rY3tIq9R-v0HjH54ZxOMWtDirx1dUXwZtaWVeHdZgSDxdqxaJZGXePm-0651CLuoTUu8p0ISgjVOyE9DR97RYuOVVuxzsp1jFvu6hrm-JQJJpLWrNyHKmdUqvHw3ShDGMTLZcQsuwZMRmyiWApLusEts0NmSPfGcSXoaNNJwkwjgEAnnd~41sbrFDgBXZaA9i6A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners approve 300‑unit Cumberland redevelopment with a bedroom mix restriction and district review of final plans.

The Board of Commissioners approved rezoning case Z‑13‑2025 on July 15 to redevelop a Homewood Suites site near Cumberland into a 300‑unit apartment community. The board added a stipulation limiting two‑bedroom units to no more than 35% of the total and required district commissioner review of final site plans and elevations after school officials expressed concerns about potential enrollment impacts on nearby schools.

Why it matters: the project is sited inside the Cumberland regional activity center near transit and major employers; proponents emphasized job proximity and tax revenue, while the Cobb County School District raised capacity concerns for nearby Teasley Elementary and related schools.

Most important details
- Park Suffred (attorney for Alliance) described the plan as a redevelopment of a 35‑year‑old hotel site into a “wrap” apartment product with a parking deck; he said the proposal includes 300 units and that the development is within 300 feet of a transit stop.
- The applicant agreed to a condition, added by the board, limiting two‑bedroom units to no more than 35% of the total units and to build mostly studios and one‑bedroom units. “We would agree that if the school board requests, we would petition to change the attendance zone,” the applicant stated when describing an option to address school capacity concerns.
- Cobb County School District representative Travis McComb told the board the petition “will cause concern for…one school” and referenced a state formula estimate; at the hearing he cited a state‑formula estimate of about 15 additional students from this project.
- The applicant presented tax‑revenue projections in the hearing record that included an estimate of roughly $1.19 million in annual ad valorem taxes at build‑out and stated the development would generate both county and school tax receipts. Those figures were provided by the applicant’s representative during the presentation.

Supporting details and background
Alliance’s attorney said the project is in a regional activity center and close to employers and transit, which supports higher residential density. He argued that using a parking deck instead of surface parking is consistent with best planning practice for central activity centers and reduces land area devoted to automobiles.

Park Suffred highlighted two options for the school‑attendance issue: (1) place the property in the Brumby Elementary attendance zone (which the applicant said had available capacity) or (2) redraw to Argyle Elementary, which the applicant said had 229 seats of excess capacity and would be a geographically closer option for students if the school board chose to redraw boundaries.

Board action and next steps
A motion to approve the rezoning passed 3‑2, with Commissioners Burrell and Gamble voting in opposition. The motion adopted the applicant’s stipulation letter dated June 9, 2025, and added the 35% cap on two‑bedroom units, plus district commissioner review of the final site plan and elevations. The approval allows the applicant to proceed with plan review; final permitting and site work remain subject to plan‑review approvals and any further conditions required during that process.

Sources and attribution
Quotes and attributions come from the hearing transcript: Park Suffred (attorney for Alliance), Travis McComb (Cobb County School District) and board members as recorded in the public hearing.","The board approved Alliance Residential’s redevelopment of a Homewood Suites site into a 300‑unit apartment building in the Cumberland regional activity center, adding a condition that no more than 35% of units be two‑bedrooms; the school district objected over potential enrollment impacts.",{"_33":98,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":99,"_41":100,"_43":101,"_45":102,"_46":103,"_48":104,"_50":105,"_52":106,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":107,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":108,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":55,"_72":55},6164633,"Commissioners approve rezoning after applicant agrees to convey dam parcel to neighbor; on‑site permit withheld until transfer",1386,5577000,6963000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe&start=5577&end=6963","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe/thumbnail_5577000.jpg","/articles/6164633/Cobb-County/Georgia/Commissioners-approve-rezoning-after-applicant-agrees-to-convey-dam-parcel-to-neighbor-onsite-permit-withheld-until-transfer","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6164633-765ec043e8d0238ec41bf12d6de047bf/orig.mp4?Expires=1774946189&Signature=KW1Wlj5gDI4rASN14R~-XMItICAoFqtxxWqcCwzkmuzMQZyvRdWNtpvn-PO4WaxENdHED~vY~w0jGFIk4aAVlvIZUDQpHaIOP2aRKNFUt7OMZtFxWfLi0BOPxjSoKSBI8pAOKACSJrM68IhrwoIP9YFJCewUgRDHcUUODrPMisSaXHPRNamt1zEnhWljI3DfyWYMAXEIglo1eCL2nWXGcMFSST14gpjXAAAP34QhWv7rbysn9-ON0mFF0PiUdYLcJli6Wg3asmqE47FHoIBWVnOX6U0cdm25JW933aTFc8L8aBMgPhSuPz8ig48v-zfPlpx0NSSwKzW4IWC~J8JwkA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Board conditions require transfer of the dam parcel to neighboring owner before on‑site construction can begin.

The Board of Commissioners on July 15 approved rezoning case Z‑10‑2025 for a proposed senior living subdivision, contingent on a stipulation the applicant read into the record: plans may be approved and a land‑disturbance permit issued, but the on‑site permit that allows construction to begin will be withheld until the applicant conveys the shaded portion of the dam, spillway and adjacent wetlands to adjoining owner Frederick (Fred) Chumley.

Why it matters: the parcel contains an existing dam (identified in the hearing as Phillips Lake) with multiple private owners and an emergency spillway that affects Chumley’s property. The transfer places primary ownership and responsibility for dam maintenance with the adjacent landowner who said he agreed to accept it.

Most important details
- Applicant attorney Kevin Moore described a negotiated solution that would convey the portion of the dam and spillway that sits on the proposed project’s parcel to adjoining owner Fred Chumley. Moore said the conveyance would make Chumley the “far and away the majority owner of the dam.”
- The applicant and county attorney’s office worked with plan‑review staff to craft a condition that allows plan approval but withholds the final on‑site permit until the conveyance is recorded; Moore explained this is enforced by withholding the pre‑construction on‑site permit until closing and recordation occur.
- Fred Chumley — sworn and present at the hearing — confirmed he understood the arrangement and was agreeable to the proposed conveyance.
- Commissioners and staff said the approach reduces legal and practical complexity for future dam maintenance because a single, adjacent private owner would be positioned to act on repairs and maintenance rather than relying on a homeowners association or multiple owners.

Supporting details and background
Kevin Moore said the site is about 52–53 acres and that the shaded portion of the site contains wetlands, the main spillway and the emergency spillway. He told the board the parcel is currently owned by three parties (one with a small share, another with a larger share made up of assembled parcels, and Chumley) and that conveying the shaded area to Chumley would make him the primary owner responsible for the dam.

Moore described the county’s enforcement point: during development the county issues plan stamps and a land‑disturbance permit (LDP), and the final step before physical work begins is a pre‑construction on‑site permit. The stipulation requires that the on‑site permit be withheld until the conveyance to Chumley is completed at closing. Moore said plan‑review staff (Dave Griffiths) and the county attorney’s office helped shape the condition.

Chumley, sworn and present, confirmed he had been in discussions with the applicant and that he agreed to the conveyance as presented at the hearing.

Discussion vs. decision
Board discussion also noted the timing of repairs. Commissioner Gamble and others asked whether Chumley could start any needed dam repairs before closing; staff and the applicant responded that the developer does not yet own the property and that repairs by Chumley prior to a conveyance would be an issue between Chumley and the current owner. The board’s formal decision did not require immediate repairs by the current owner; rather, it required the property transfer condition before on‑site construction permits are released.

Board action and next steps
The board approved the rezoning with the conveyance condition and related stipulations; vote was recorded as 5‑0. The permitting and engineering plan review process will proceed, but the county will withhold the on‑site construction permit until documentation of the conveyance is submitted and accepted as required by plan‑review procedures.

Sources and attribution
This report relies on in‑hearing testimony and the official public record: Kevin Moore (applicant attorney), Frederick Chumley (adjacent property owner), Commissioner Sheffield (district commissioner), and references to county plan‑review staff and the county attorney’s office.","Rezoning for a 52‑acre senior living subdivision was approved after the applicant agreed to convey the portion of the dam and spillway affecting Phillips Lake to adjacent owner Frederick Chumley; the board required that the on‑site land‑disturbance permit be withheld until the conveyance is complete.",{"_33":110,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":111,"_41":112,"_43":113,"_45":114,"_46":115,"_48":116,"_50":117,"_52":118,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":119,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":120,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":55,"_72":55},6164639,"Commissioners approve rezoning for 24 townhomes near Powder Springs Road after stormwater, tree and school concerns",4271,871000,5142000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe&start=871&end=5142","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5427009-569800665a9459d68ea752d5d5bf9dfe/thumbnail_871000.jpg","/articles/6164639/Cobb-County/Georgia/Commissioners-approve-rezoning-for-24-townhomes-near-Powder-Springs-Road-after-stormwater-tree-and-school-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6164639-85c5a030db09d88eef3a4a7000ee9512/orig.mp4?Expires=1774946189&Signature=lRxTN5Oe9cd1tEYCu-t5PhW5HYss0aVk-dXrDscyUHj-7jdLpVnv-uwE~oM4frX6DUGmqC9ZcLdpPVA75HWFH3G~ZLWBUz1Yp~~lxV3MIYD-krAPVjRisLrul14sxp8eAkH0WYGmdj7AKEWCfYetVg3B7Ip3s-LDusffCs1ArsQJsW-yixPCLUNojLNxcj9v9QND6Y5YKrB6rJMOofTBqnoZ8CS6BCONaUqkKVW0kWS6t4cHEZTnHPrZIUu3xwDZIWuZUhG7kMndCd0U-OPc8LhX9UHbKOg-v3hu6wg2ksh8Ka6HX4LiTKGCh2IC73eGV-8V2RLHtVpwjsN0umIm2Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Rezoning approved for 24 townhomes at Powder Springs Road and Wood Meadows Drive after commissioners required specific stormwater and landscape conditions.

The Board of Commissioners voted 3‑2 on July 15 to approve rezoning case Z‑7‑2025, allowing a 24‑unit townhome development on a property the applicant described as “just under five acres.” The board added stipulations requiring final stormwater engineering, a 20‑foot buffer on the western side facing Horseshoe Bend and district review of final elevations, landscaping and stormwater plans.

Why it matters: neighbors raised repeated concerns about drainage, tree loss and school capacity, and county staff and the applicant presented technical steps intended to reduce downstream impacts. The added conditions aim to require engineering and recorded easements before construction begins.

Most important details
- The applicant, represented by attorney Kevin Moore, said the plan includes a detention pond and a pipe system to move runoff from the site and to capture existing discharge from an adjacent shopping center. “We can put in drop inlets…when it reaches that spot…we have a drain that catches it and puts it right into the pipe,” Moore said, describing how the plan would capture the plaza’s runoff once water enters the existing drainage easement.
- Cobb County Stormwater Management’s Andrew Heath said piping and detention “will be a great improvement” for downstream neighbors, and that the developer will need to demonstrate downstream connections and obtain any required easements during the plan‑review and land‑disturbance process.
- Neighbors and speakers in opposition cited school overcrowding, loss of trees and the change from single‑family yards to denser housing. Steven Swanson read large portions of Cobb County’s tree ordinance and urged preservation of canopy. Cobb County School District representative Travis McComb said, “Based on our old formula…we estimate it could be around 5 students” added to the high school enrollment from this development.
- The planning commission recommended approval with conditions; staff recommended approval subject to stormwater comments, a 20‑foot buffer on the west and other standard requirements.

Supporting details and background
Kevin Moore said the site sits at a signalized intersection adjacent to commercial development and that the county’s future land‑use plan identifies the parcel as medium‑density residential. “This plan is for a total of 24 townhomes, at this location,” he said, adding that the project “meets your comprehensive plan and future land use map.”

Moore told the board he and his team had met with two adjacent property owners whose yards lie along the proposed drainage route. He said one owner (2250 Rock Ridge) maintains an open swale and had been receptive to piping the flow because the proposed pipe would reduce the homeowner’s maintenance burden. Moore said any final connection to the shopping‑center detention pond could be made either by direct easement with the plaza owner or by intercepting the flow once it reaches the existing drainage easement.

Andrew Heath summarized the county’s position: the proposed plan needs a defined downstream conveyance, piping where appropriate, and the ability to control outflow rates from the new detention pond so as not to overload downstream systems. Heath said the new infrastructure could be recorded and dedicated so the county could maintain it if appropriate easements and plats are recorded.

On tree protection and buffers, zoning manager John Peterson reminded the board Cobb County has a tree ordinance in chapter 50 of the county code and that the planning commission had recommended a 20‑foot buffer on the western property line — twice the code minimum for that zoning — to increase screening for Horseshoe Bend residents.

Board action and next steps
Commissioner Sheffield (district commissioner) moved approval with the applicant’s signed stipulations and additional district oversight, including district sign‑off on stormwater plans and final elevations; the motion carried 3‑2, with Commissioners Burrell and Gamble recorded in opposition. The board’s conditions require the applicant to: meet stormwater review comments, pursue required easements and platting so the new infrastructure can be dedicated if needed, plant the required buffer and provide homeowner association seed funding for future maintenance of private improvements.

The record shows staff and the planning commission recommended approval and that final engineering, plat revisions and any necessary easement documentation will be resolved during plan review. The board’s decision authorizes rezoning but does not authorize construction; final permits and recorded easements will be required before on‑site work may start.

Sources and attribution
Quotes and factual attributions in this report come from the public meeting transcript and speakers listed in the record: Kevin Moore (applicant attorney), Andrew Heath (Cobb County Stormwater Management), Travis McComb (Cobb County School District), John Peterson (zoning manager), Steven Swanson (resident), and Commissioner Sheffield.

Ending
The approved rezoning advances a 24‑unit townhome project that county staff and the planning commission said fits the future land use map for that corridor, but the project remains contingent on completed stormwater engineering, recorded easements and final site‑plan approvals that the board required as conditions.","The Cobb County Board of Commissioners narrowly approved rezoning of a 4.8‑acre site at Powder Springs Road and Wood Meadows Drive for 24 townhomes, with conditions addressing stormwater conveyance, a 20‑foot buffer to the Horseshoe Bend neighborhood and district review of final plans; the vote was 3‑2.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners deny temporary land‑use permit after applicant fails to appear for third time

Board amends land‑use permit condition to limit disclosure of current unrelated occupants to zoning division

Panel approves 300‑unit Cumberland redevelopment despite school district concerns; stipulation limits two‑bedroom units

Commissioners approve rezoning after applicant agrees to convey dam parcel to neighbor; on‑site permit withheld until transfer

Commissioners approve rezoning for 24 townhomes near Powder Springs Road after stormwater, tree and school concerns