Boulder Council Discusses Historic Preservation and Zoning Changes for Naropa Property

The Boulder City Planning Board meeting on July 19, 2025, focused on significant discussions surrounding historic preservation, land use, and zoning regulations, particularly in relation to properties owned by Naropa University. The meeting highlighted the complexities of maintaining historical integrity while addressing the community's housing needs.

A key topic was the potential historic designation of two buildings on the Naropa property: the Arapahoe House and the Chestnut House, also known as the Tea House. Both structures are eligible for historic preservation, which would require a demolition permit for any alterations. The board discussed the implications of relocating these buildings, with historic preservation staff expressing a preference against relocation, although the final decision would depend on further evaluations during the permitting process.

The conversation also delved into zoning regulations, particularly how they affect land use for educational institutions like Naropa. Board members clarified that if Naropa were to retain ownership of the property, it could develop housing aligned with its educational mission. However, if the property were to be sold to a private developer, the zoning restrictions would limit residential development to six units per acre, significantly constraining potential housing projects.

Another critical point raised was the need for clarity regarding the land use map and its impact on growth projections outlined in the Boulder Valley Comprehensive Plan. Board members expressed concerns about the vagueness of criteria related to land use changes and the necessity for detailed information to guide future decisions.

The meeting also touched on the Lincoln School Building, a landmark structure central to the proposed development. While the preservation of the building itself is assured, there are currently no specific criteria governing how the surrounding site can be developed in relation to the landmark.

In conclusion, the discussions at the Boulder City Planning Board meeting underscored the delicate balance between preserving historical sites and accommodating the growing housing demands in the community. As the board moves forward, further evaluations and clarifications will be essential to navigate the complexities of zoning and historic preservation in Boulder. The next steps will involve continued dialogue among stakeholders to ensure that both community needs and historical integrity are respected in future developments.