Community Divided Over Title IX Resolution at Levitt School Board Meeting

The MSAD52 Board of Directors meeting held on May 29, 2025, became a platform for passionate discussions surrounding the rights of transgender students and the implications of proposed policies on gender identity in schools. The meeting highlighted a significant divide among community members regarding the treatment of transgender and non-binary students, particularly in relation to sports and school guidelines.

Alan Sarvinas, representing Parents' Rights in Education, urged the board to consider a resolution that would enforce Title IX protections for girls' sports, arguing that local control should guide decisions in the district. He referenced federal law and the support of the Maine Principals Association, emphasizing the need for policies that align with what he believes is the majority opinion among parents in the district.

In stark contrast, several students and community members voiced their concerns about the potential harm such policies could inflict on transgender and gender non-conforming students. Julie Gruner, a high school student, expressed her worry about the transphobia that could arise from the discussions, advocating for a focus on creating a safe and supportive environment for all students rather than fixating on their identities.

Beep Harrington, a non-binary resident, echoed these sentiments, highlighting the dangers of rhetoric that targets queer and trans individuals. They called for respect and compassion, emphasizing the need for understanding rather than fear. Other speakers, including educators and students, reinforced the importance of transparency in school policies and the need to protect the rights and dignity of all students, particularly those from marginalized communities.

The meeting underscored the ongoing debate over how schools should navigate issues of gender identity and the rights of students. As the board considers these discussions, the implications for student safety, inclusivity, and community cohesion remain at the forefront. The outcome of these deliberations will likely shape the educational environment for many students in the district, highlighting the critical need for thoughtful and compassionate policy-making.