Lewiston School Committee Faces Public Backlash Over New Comment Restrictions

During the recent Lewiston Public Schools School Committee meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding new public comment rules that limit participation and transparency. The committee adopted a consent agenda without objection, but the real discussion began when public input was opened.

Matthew Egren, a resident of Ward 4, voiced strong opposition to the recent changes in public comment procedures. He criticized the committee for implementing a three-minute speaking limit per person and a total of 30 minutes for public comments, which he argued restricts community engagement. Egren highlighted that previously, there were no limits on the number of speakers or the time allotted for comments, allowing for a more open dialogue.

Egren also pointed out the lack of a sign-up sheet or vetting process for speakers, raising concerns about fairness and accessibility. He questioned whether non-residents could submit comments electronically, as had been discussed, and emphasized the need for a public comment email similar to that used by the city council. Additionally, he brought attention to the challenges faced by multicultural residents who may require translation services, suggesting that the time limit should be adjusted to accommodate these needs.

The resident concluded his remarks by urging the committee to remember the importance of public input, especially on issues that may not align with their views. He expressed a belief that the committee's recent changes reflect a reluctance to hear from the community.

Following Egren's comments, the meeting transitioned to a budget workshop, indicating that financial discussions are nearing completion. The committee is expected to consider various options for the upcoming budget, which will directly impact the schools and the community at large.

As the committee moves forward, the implications of the new public comment rules and the ongoing budget discussions will be closely watched by residents, who are eager to ensure their voices are heard in the decision-making process.