[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6745604,"mediaKeyId","5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea","parentId",5443846,"title","Staff briefs council on moderate-income housing report due Aug. 1; ADUs and targeted rezones highlighted","audioSeconds",268,"startMs",7712000,"endMs",7980000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea&start=7712&end=7980","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea/thumbnail_7712000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6745604/Utah/Staff-briefs-council-on-moderate-income-housing-report-due-Aug-1-ADUs-and-targeted-rezones-highlighted","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6745604-822db9523d1e57a5838e16f68a4c2e02/orig.mp4?Expires=1775227264&Signature=fLL0aW~l~oNw9rT39geTn2MdjjI~lLwlC82XalHFGvrbhmLpnRvWvyUEUETYu3Pcrm4PJdPWkKcTETabf3iHBfEq8ox3wRKF8hp4RS8XbBVadHITm7UvtviYyIpSZwJXJd95sBpUzjdbGnNUY~uEPqHQWxKJIEO0~V-AV17fo4vkSBuwtrTuiVVviIM-EJ4M0RlD8NQQNEP69HFN-y8IUu7AkXY3TEtXGfZOTpHXYoS6VgVUFY9arciV~aE0gSy-X~LspsZYDW7J3XMDApzhiLzzURufFzKMpXmv9eBZXc9qxocGaS04Mboicvsm6LhEwCFo2uWjOQ0d9zYnIGMCPg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Hooper City","date","2025-07-22T01:38:05.08Z","article","Hooper staff briefed the council on the Moderate-Income Housing Report due Aug. 1 and summarized work completed so far. Staff said the report documents local efforts in three areas: encouraging accessory dwelling units (ADUs), identifying corridors or areas suitable for higher-density residential and mixed-use development, and amending land-use regulations where appropriate.

Staff reported five detached ADUs were permitted in 2025 to date and said the planning commission had recommended increasing the allowable ADU size; staff planned to return to the council with a recommended amendment. The report also highlights a planning-commission-backed rezone application for the Smiths property as a targeted area where higher-density allowances could be appropriate. Staff recommended periodically refreshing the strategies—removing ones completed (for example after an ADU-size amendment) and adding new, measurable strategies in future reports.

Staff asked the council whether it preferred quarterly follow-ups or a series of three focused meetings with the planning commission to track implementation. Councilmembers asked staff to provide supporting data and to begin reporting earlier in the calendar year to avoid the typical late-summer rush when the official report is due.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","July 17, 2025 - City Council Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","City staff told the council on July 17 that the Moderate-Income Housing Report due Aug. 1 will emphasize ADUs, targeted zoning for higher-density development and land-use regulation updates.","taxTitle","Hooper City Council, Hooper , Weber County, Utah","taxId",21280,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6745621,"Hooper council rejects motion to temporarily shift mayoral powers after closed-door review",1373,5051000,6424000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea&start=5051&end=6424","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea/thumbnail_5051000.jpg","/articles/6745621/Utah/Hooper-council-rejects-motion-to-temporarily-shift-mayoral-powers-after-closed-door-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6745621-55a9faa6c94eda8f7ae30c9f2ffd9ead/orig.mp4?Expires=1775227264&Signature=FTGdCRAkVb3xe3vkBCMcqyyWIcQmRl57~S63fEbvlXc-atLTDUw6kBjfgpCwtOLw8khD8ab4QzLpbl1OYFOVZ1poirDlXmWJ0bMalpzhYlTd5qznK0thJFLxSoufZVm5rKxw7yap5WosK~8jF8MRTbep677jt1ibejMwNgXnx-EsvbTumWqY2vR73xIghpmoFuWhXC-oP38zkZ7dkul-2who5bDD44arkDlZOwo17QqBhcOqM-QXioA3IdjtRUkhtrNPp7ddK7vEMspy-Cs8lkTdLRphijeuw1Egg7MFvTz2rP~Gm5TUxA1gDM6VhJplmQlU83JDBAu2b8755z4cAg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Mayor Sherry Beamham and the Hooper City Council held a lengthy discussion July 17 about whether to temporarily shift some mayoral powers to the council. Council member Wilcox moved to transfer specified mayoral authorities to the full council pending Reed (city attorney) drafting an ordinance; Council member Maragoni seconded the motion. The motion failed because state law requires a unanimous roll-call vote for such a transfer and the council did not reach unanimity.

The item followed a closed-door meeting the council held in June. Resident Chris Paulson asked during public comment whether that private meeting had occurred and what outcomes were reached; Mayor Beamham confirmed a June closed session took place and said, \"I thought things went well personally.\" Council member Wilcox said the closed session produced \"some progress\" and flagged ongoing concerns about transparency and repeated ordinance violations raised by other residents.

Council and public discussion included allegations that the mayor had exceeded her authority; the speaker presenting those concerns said there were \"67 known violations\" (city and state) documented by private citizens. Mayor Beamham disputed the breadth of those claims in the public forum, saying she had been told of only one formal violation and urged the council to \"work together\" and move on from internal disputes.

Council member Wilcox said the motion was a step toward restoring accountability and allowed Reed to later craft the ordinance if the council approved. The motion required unanimous consent under state law; the roll call did not produce unanimity and the motion therefore failed. The council then continued to other agenda items.

The council did not adopt any ordinance or permanent change to the mayoral powers at this meeting; council members said the attorney will prepare any necessary ordinance language if future action is requested. The debate highlighted unresolved friction among elected members and left the issue open for possible future action.","After a three-hour closed-door meeting in June, council members debated a motion to temporarily transfer some mayoral powers to the council while an ordinance is drafted. The motion, made July 17, failed because unanimity was required and not achieved.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6745608,"Votes at a glance: minutes, business license, Roy Hillside Senior Center interlocal, and ordinance on home signs",1351,4995000,6346000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea&start=4995&end=6346","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea/thumbnail_4995000.jpg","/articles/6745608/Utah/Votes-at-a-glance-minutes-business-license-Roy-Hillside-Senior-Center-interlocal-and-ordinance-on-home-signs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6745608-c569cd4b465560f6db05141dba149f4f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775227264&Signature=G09K5F-GGllw0T87jPxuYqbbe0plxYJIPBuMUyGL6u-7WJYMJs~5Oqo2aL3haTLRuF8J2dSpeAcJpCEiKHwgyvy9n3eAsT2ZdvaVhQ1RHSXPzQI7zSN48TxlsR-i8cii3N7cjhZ~01dv8Qm694NIIlU~fxw12on2pO8Q9obFVibeIpEISJCi~tjnL87rythJMf~TMPFRJ5P-VCjNScRDFMr7AsR9c70NxHjZhjDnE5BYDny8xg7vbiQmS7uDt3b3TDL8L7deDLvurydjWCtSisxZjPCcIv0Snls5OIcYfHsyn8pSLdYMIRuuz-F915FAV9NyxQSxU8H0PsOYUvzBeg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Hooper City Council handled several routine approvals July 17. Key outcomes:

- Minutes: The council voted to approve minutes from June 5, June 17 and June 24 with minor spelling corrections. The motion was made by Council member Kiel and seconded by Council member Maragoni; the motion carried.

- KinderCoop commercial business license: Council approved a conditional-use commercial business license for KinderCoop, a home-based half-day kindergarten at 3928 South 5350 West. Applicant Kishina (\"Kash\") Tomlin presented her licensing, staffing and building plans; council members noted required certifications and building details before approving the license.

- Roy Hillside Senior Center interlocal and resolution (Res. 2025-04): Council approved entering the interlocal agreement with Roy City to provide senior center services and amended the motion to limit the agreement to one year; the motion passed. Hooper’s financial commitment was confirmed at $4,000 for the one-year period to support meals and services for Hooper residents at Roy Hillside Senior Center.

- Ordinance 2025-03 (home signs): The council adopted Ordinance 2025-03 concerning posting of home-occupation signs by residents. The council discussed whether to fold other categories of signage into the same ordinance and chose to adopt this ordinance focused on home-occupation signage while directing staff to draft separate guidance for other types of signs.

Votes were recorded on several items; the record shows motions were seconded and approved in council; specific roll-call details were used where required (for the ordinance adoption).","At the July 17 meeting the council approved three sets of minutes, granted a commercial business license to a home kindergarten (KinderCoop), adopted an interlocal agreement and resolution with Roy Hillside Senior Center (one-year, $4,000 commitment), and adopted Ordinance 2025-03 on home-occupation signage.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6745613,"Council weighs Tomato Days expenses and a plan to sell concrete ‘tomato’ sculptures to raise funds",63,424000,487000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea&start=424&end=487","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea/thumbnail_424000.jpg","/articles/6745613/Utah/Council-weighs-Tomato-Days-expenses-and-a-plan-to-sell-concrete-tomato-sculptures-to-raise-funds","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6745613-959c7634eda825b67e37ffb842cdf621/orig.mp4?Expires=1775227264&Signature=M-HXU1hYnOX3OBUm7Dalfk4l3UqqLhQ0-pOFjk6KyfGo-dVOKc5JqsKztGmf3ozUEHJUB2i51rO~IPVOu-SE6YFpxVhYVQoTURc-gppC-sLzEf7rT9KTYEGOKphPQsRsofI04g4cwi22D1IgAxn-txhLsjVz30w4PXKX2HDua9my7WItOEWn~9g1lpbMcVwI0jNsBwHd7xaDVHlOG6IqR4s61XEZFOkIzZkOa5dKHeitjSHzD63gSgNmVvJzpYlFDtrdtAMOLNVMtJy9jxxS-a7-UvB1btWKqFuvS3WHEeEDfvKbmEpOhhTgd2FKFAsE34r1Jg-wINPTDZ-TBf0JUQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Hooper’s centennial Tomato Days featured prominently in the July 17 work meeting. Staff described an offer to purchase concrete tomato sculptures for resale at Tomato Days and explained the upfront costs and operational constraints.

Staff reported the vendor can fit 24 small and 20 large sculptures on a truck and estimated a total truck/shipping cost of about $9,200 (all tomatoes included). Proposed retail prices mentioned in the meeting were about $3.25 for a large tomato and $1.75 for a small (staff said the vendor previously charged $300 for large and $150 for small in earlier years and the new pricing represents an increase to cover shipping). Staff cautioned that large sculptures weigh roughly 900 pounds and small ones about 300 pounds; the vendor can produce at most one large unit per day. For those reasons they suggested presales to ensure truckloads would be sold and discussed possible alternatives (hollow plastic molds that could be filled with sand to reduce shipping weight).

Councilors and staff also discussed operational risks: upfront payment required to order the truckload, the time needed for production (about three weeks), and the staff time required to sell and store heavy items. Staff proposed this be handled as pass-through (purchase then resale) rather than a long-term budget appropriation.

Council asked staff to research local manufacturing alternatives, presale demand and whether a hollow/plastic option could reduce shipping and handling issues. No final purchasing decision was made at the work session; staff was asked to return with more precise cost estimates and presale interest.","Council and staff discussed fundraising and logistics for the city’s centennial Tomato Days, including a staff proposal to buy and resell concrete tomato sculptures. Staff described unit pricing, shipping/truck costs and production constraints; council suggested presales and researching lighter alternatives.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6745618,"Hooper Council begins comprehensive fee-schedule review covering parks, planning and public-works charges",1897,1499000,3396000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea&start=1499&end=3396","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5443846-afd927cda369f29acd7e6987128c52ea/thumbnail_1499000.jpg","/articles/6745618/Utah/Hooper-Council-begins-comprehensive-fee-schedule-review-covering-parks-planning-and-public-works-charges","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6745618-2762507b16aab85110834f7649b9bad1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775227264&Signature=SWPE2w5r3mHc0u6fRNBhDUKTqrKy5kWLJ7T8kPG~M8r61VNXROqex8ez3HUzVPKIcdP023WPL5PiiUCYoFlL-0qsf4XGT~-fAwhaIZh1DYmsUxfKcqx7GgDWLSrEtcKnhHC7CjVhXwe8MLX12bhPaa59MmmhhQdmHKhdu4WvuXg5enSqu2Ao8ODDU5Ih4uRYWXaTdkhUpCXCD7EJUk1sV931dJR44f1R-jUS7jkA5XxO0YZ9qYQmYSibXDd~ykYmefug4DUlILwhQZZLaaEJB2hGcn~-99pvYfQBJWWxLSzmmG4rfkDb40myaoIa~rpL9HM3SLB72sSRW2aFsqxnsw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Council and staff spent a large portion of the July 17 work meeting reviewing Hooper’s fee schedule, last revised in 2021. Staff circulated draft changes and asked the council for direction; no final votes were taken at the work session.

Key proposals discussed included a $100 development escrow reinspection fee to cover repeated inspections beyond the first two, changes to single-family subdivision fees (including a per-lot engineering charge adjustment), and a proposed $2.75 lot-line-adjustment fee. Public Works recommended specific cost-recovery rates for equipment used in code-enforcement work (loader/backhoe, street sweeper, operator time) and emphasized that those charges are intended for municipal cost recovery, not commercial rental.

Parks staff proposed a resident/nonresident tier for Bowery/pavilion rentals: a combined large-bowery-plus-kitchen fee (proposed $100 resident, $200 nonresident) and a smaller bowery fee (proposed $50 resident, $100 nonresident). The council discussed operational issues (access to lights, water, cleaning supplies) and whether to require credit-card-on-file in place of refundable deposits to simplify post-event accounting.

Staff also reported a number of other line-item edits: adding a development-escrow fee for repeat reinspections, updating sewer connection permit language to include subdivision per-lot surcharges, and aligning some asphalt and crack-seal rates with current contract costs. Jared (public works) clarified some proposed hourly/equipment rates and told the council these are intended to capture actual city costs when staff perform work for code enforcement.

Council asked staff to collect comparative data from neighboring municipalities and to return with any suggested changes and recommended thresholds; several items will be revised and returned for decision at a future meeting.","Staff presented a line-by-line review of the city fee schedule (last updated 2021) at the July 17 work meeting. Proposed changes included a $100 development reinspection fee, adjustments to subdivision and lot-line fees, new public-works equipment cost rates for code enforcement recovery, and proposed resident/nonresident park rental rates.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Staff briefs council on moderate-income housing report due Aug. 1; ADUs and targeted rezones highlighted

Hooper council rejects motion to temporarily shift mayoral powers after closed-door review

Votes at a glance: minutes, business license, Roy Hillside Senior Center interlocal, and ordinance on home signs

Council weighs Tomato Days expenses and a plan to sell concrete ‘tomato’ sculptures to raise funds

Hooper Council begins comprehensive fee-schedule review covering parks, planning and public-works charges