[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6158634,"mediaKeyId","5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3","parentId",5457929,"title","Residents urge commission to require RPC approval for two‑lot subdivisions after church‑camp activity at Jim Henry Road sheds","audioSeconds",433,"startMs",1102000,"endMs",1535000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3&start=1102&end=1535","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3/thumbnail_1102000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6158634/Tennessee/Residents-urge-commission-to-require-RPC-approval-for-twolot-subdivisions-after-churchcamp-activity-at-Jim-Henry-Road-sheds","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6158634-677677ef35f3fd811a268d6ec9d9badb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775209563&Signature=EOSLq7al1gVz1LfXZ4k-lri6sYyfVjMjlcD5Spmm71HSyAr-I~~uBs-9tBQFbKFaxVC7T8O9BOALh5vYy0~cODwye-gmTK261CAyHj0-GZ3Sn5lMTnm7kZ00yDBLTPUv~5g-58TuGWKmGnuzcN6x77kUCfe22xreQvIqD7nmMxeutXkzXQLRprF0i1HxvND3L4Wd9Otep1z1tfcdW3GDF4ymRGvcDOoBVEpepyuGGEa50hi3XOAACtW7DZetG2Jb7KuhojclV8ncmHtJkfSO3lzldLUd6ZfqbwGbaccFL-PC0RCLwLhPT4z-VgT-LlZ2F6Na5OFXWfpSPxLKrARoFQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Jefferson County, TN","date","2025-07-24T04:12:00.557Z","article","Several residents urged the Regional Planning Commission to require that all two‑lot subdivisions be reviewed and approved by the commission after they said an approved subdivision was used to host organized church‑camp activity at structures on Jim Henry Road.

Jim Fox and Kathleen Billards said minutes and legal delegation language from 2006 raised questions about whether administrative subdivision approvals had been improperly delegated to a named individual rather than to a position. Billards and others described observations at 2249A and 2249B Jim Henry Road—multiple vehicles, 40–60 youth wearing shirts carrying a church logo, pontoon boats ferrying youths to the shoreline, overnight stays with towels and clothing on railings, organized music and instructions not to speak to outsiders— and said those activities looked like a structured church camp rather than a casual family gathering.

Why it matters: Commenters contend that church camps and similar group assembly uses are not allowed in the county's A‑1 agricultural zoning and that administrative approvals of two‑lot subdivisions can enable uses that evade public review. They asked the commission to restore or confirm final approval authority for two‑lot subdivisions so the commission will have oversight.

What staff and the commission said: Planning staff and the commission deferred legal action until the county attorney reviews documents; the county attorney asked for time to consult and the commission agreed to table the item until the next meeting. Staff clarified enforcement options: zoning violations can be enforced as civil violations through the county judge with fines (staff cited potential fines up to $50 per day per offense), and activities that qualify as \"group assembly\" fall under the State Fire Marshal's purview for building and fire safety. Staff advised that citizens who suspect a zoning violation should notify the county mayor's office or the mayor's designee so the county can initiate enforcement steps.

Board action: Item D, the procedural question about delegation and two‑lot subdivisions, was tabled to allow the county attorney (Sam Edwards) to review the record and offer an opinion. Public commenters and a citizen representative (Bob Frasagna) urged the commission to require RPC approval of two‑lot subdivisions going forward.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","July 22, 2025 - Jefferson County, TN - Board of Zoning Appeal & Regional Planning Commission","oneSentenceSummary","Public commenters asked the commission to require Regional Planning Commission approval for all two‑lot subdivisions, citing recent activity at sheds on Jim Henry Road where organized overnight church camps occurred; the commission tabled action pending county attorney review.","taxTitle","Board of Zoning Appeals and Regional Planning Commission Meetings, Jefferson County, Tennessee","taxId",73403,"location","Tennessee","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6158639,"Commission tables discussion on multi‑tier agricultural districts and proposed C‑3 commercial zone for further review",1215,3198000,4413000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3&start=3198&end=4413","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3/thumbnail_3198000.jpg","/articles/6158639/Tennessee/Commission-tables-discussion-on-multitier-agricultural-districts-and-proposed-C3-commercial-zone-for-further-review","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6158639-ffce40baff5364e35d68f27909e0c9f9/orig.mp4?Expires=1775209563&Signature=R3~hBOeRnNv9IWq~FDlwe2EoxZ4kq2BBc-PhkB4OPHerxYpzmdhIh5p4AyhpwA-W8BTXyy~hGUlo8~LcbumaZVcdir5hw9QDYX~HXKySzLLgWAZlpDjD5YSPDX9-XCDoiMgWrAoKoQy8hezSP8cwpqegOE8uHSWrxKuojLRNFEXD53mi0uRrRics8O3q9RF3pxIcKnJh1230LB7e8X3DQOgMAJxv95tNv9qyFxHld8l1XTm4LxYjjVr4rsOx9-P7HxKNa2b6elKnqp2N~8I4WMbi2~8aGeVBe1~W8XqvqdAzO2hO~E66qx-FWtEdS42MMX~I4UMBwKs1UVXjS2whfw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Regional Planning Commission discussed creating additional agricultural districts (A‑2, A‑3) and advancing a proposed C‑3 zone intended to accommodate commercial uses that do not belong in industrial districts. After an extended presentation and discussion, the commission voted to table the item to allow members time to review materials and to pursue a workshop with interested stakeholders.

Planner Austin Brooks and staff presented examples from neighboring counties showing A‑1/A‑2/A‑3 frameworks and described how an A‑3 district can allow value‑added agricultural uses such as small slaughterhouses, sawmills, and certain agritourism activities under performance criteria. Mr. Brooks said the tools could protect low‑density residential character while enabling farm businesses to diversify income.

Why it matters: Commissioners said the county's current zoning map leaves a wide gap between A‑1 and I‑1 (industrial), which can force controversial rezoning requests into I‑1. A new C‑3 and refined agricultural tiers would give the county more tailored tools to manage growth and preserve agricultural viability.

Details: Commissioners discussed examples from Washington and Sullivan counties and considered minimum lot sizes, buffers, and conditional uses. Several members suggested a multi‑step public review: a workshop with the agricultural committee and county commissioners, draft language revisions, and then return to the planning commission. A motion to table Item C until the August meeting passed.

What follows: Staff will provide written examples and commissioners agreed to consider forming a working session that includes county commissioners and agricultural stakeholders before advancing ordinance language.","Commissioners debated adding A‑2 and A‑3 agricultural districts and a new C‑3 commercial zone to provide intermediate options between rural agriculture and industrial zones; discussion was tabled for further review and stakeholder meetings.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6158644,"Regional Planning Commission adopts updated subdivision regulations on road construction, bonding and as‑built drawings",115,3114000,3229000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3&start=3114&end=3229","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3/thumbnail_3114000.jpg","/articles/6158644/Tennessee/Regional-Planning-Commission-adopts-updated-subdivision-regulations-on-road-construction-bonding-and-asbuilt-drawings","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6158644-e715621084c35935782b10fd8b733beb/orig.mp4?Expires=1775209563&Signature=LnKcvIXpv0ikQbCG0Lp5Kae4McBnIE5JZ50ym6ayjifKgcqsiW73NosevLvtbRno9Y56Y4ulAUEwgvCKYfOqcgbgmNRwbWnMNd9xFRZBC0tDvFJHeXSlAGRt0Dab36Hvwu-lKWZ0ZFzElu3Vy3KqgvGRMZxKulOGnQ8kNmorETvPZsrk8dv2B3mFB1xh4xNj~~1xWIXwx4LVa1gOLgK2x9w~5c8JyRdfiwE9s5grPYgfr8iTRA9vadzMH7IMpk126kQXz-tnmaHTnIBWFmlfth8sNoHXP6q527ntSnv5zRRBKPdNEuFVMo~~FAsJ9vvZjh0y7iDWRG66ksWUcSJx7w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Jefferson County Regional Planning Commission unanimously adopted a resolution amending county subdivision regulations to clarify requirements for road construction, bonding and the submission of as‑built drawings.

Planning staff presented the documents and said they had been posted for public review; commissioners said the revisions had been discussed at multiple meetings and made available for inspection prior to the vote. A commissioner moved to adopt the amendments and the motion passed on a voice vote.

Why it matters: The amended rules change how developers secure bonds for road work and how the county documents completed infrastructure, steps that affect both developer obligations and the county's ability to accept public improvements.

Details: Staff made printed copies available at the meeting. The commission recorded the adoption as “Resolution 2024‑11” amending the zoning resolution and incorporating the subdivision regulation changes.

What follows: The amended regulations will apply to future subdivision final plats and bonding exercises; they will be enforced by planning staff and other designated county officials when infrastructure is submitted.","The commission voted to adopt amendments to the county subdivision regulations that address road construction standards, bonding and required as‑built drawings.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6158649,"Planning commission grants preliminary approval for Mountain View Estates with stormwater and road conditions",143,1853000,1996000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3&start=1853&end=1996","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3/thumbnail_1853000.jpg","/articles/6158649/Tennessee/Planning-commission-grants-preliminary-approval-for-Mountain-View-Estates-with-stormwater-and-road-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6158649-82d2492880b927ba12d16dfce47b419e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775209563&Signature=O6awh7~OXSKL0uK-9iytZlXYbBkCgo8ICv~Eu1WFureo2eo6keC0jJpwzncWIQp4y9T~fZ5n8sdJj-0ldyjEN3~7Bl5lUWYqZw9HrSDHQrB6jyGASNiy~SZntzKG5Q~zZzseGer6zLisAcOpw1E7bsVN8h0F0eUBTPEOZ2mnit1y2jbx~GdwLmfYcayQ0DAX1xZg5vpyJL0u4zkN1bnWGOHJLaNmItTvD~bcts~5OY5zbj9R8pJUx20wr9ZWljzO2LX5II5QtG0xbg53flCQn0k7SrvqJf9Acsh9ZbQb3TYYUrCGFs8qtSKfN2b5jtbXzq9orUhdDTLNj12HU~2k5A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Jefferson County Regional Planning Commission granted preliminary approval for Mountain View Estates, a proposed 68‑lot subdivision off Cole Road in Jefferson City, but imposed explicit contingencies requiring technical engineering and sign‑offs before any final plat is accepted.

The applicant, identified in the agenda as Jim Phelan, sought renewal of a preliminary plat the commission originally approved in May. Commissioners and staff emphasized that a preliminary plat normally must be accompanied by sealed engineering drawings for road construction, drainage, and utility plans. A commissioner voiced concern that stormwater and road construction plans had not been submitted for county review and that the county's road superintendent had not signed off on drainage calculations, catch basins and possible detention needs.

Why it matters: The commission's conditions aim to ensure that construction will not accelerate runoff and flooding onto adjacent properties and that road infrastructure meets county standards before lots are finalized.

Required contingencies listed by the commission included: submission of road and drainage plans sealed by a licensed engineer; written review and recommendation from the county road superintendent; stormwater detention or approved conveyance calculations and any needed detention design; and documentation of fire flow and hydrant placement. The applicant said some water‑system work is planned and that fire hydrants and waterline sizing had been evaluated previously; he agreed to provide a complete package including PDF copies for staff review.

Board action: The commission approved the preliminary plat with the stated contingencies and agreed that no final plat consideration for Phase 1 (or any phase) would be entertained until the required technical packages and signoffs were submitted in writing.

What's next: The applicant agreed to provide the requested engineering and water/fire documentation; staff and the road superintendent will review those materials and bring any recommendations back to the commission prior to final plat approval.","The commission extended preliminary approval for the 68‑lot Mountain View Estates on Cole Road contingent on submission of engineered road and stormwater plans, road superintendent sign‑off, and fire‑flow/hydrant documentation before final plat consideration.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6158655,"Commission approves six RV hookups at Dandridge Love’s site as accessory use",252,701000,953000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3&start=701&end=953","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5457929-02e95816440be6998b51c127aaa5a4d3/thumbnail_701000.jpg","/articles/6158655/Tennessee/Commission-approves-six-RV-hookups-at-Dandridge-Loves-site-as-accessory-use","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6158655-a3abac7f1f99412cabc4eae7a3aff7e7/orig.mp4?Expires=1775209563&Signature=eDIHj029Y2L7lITQcIf2LitMycW~5EMgE2~902Hdl5yEo0E5mrFtEVIbYdWr8t8xCqB8Nqvjn1qmI8dnTgFVmyM~xjHLT2SZ6-f0BLC-5fWB2YtEc1z0yIa02dMBCdER3EjxsTDa2Yw-yNH-QShzXV3aPybCLBb3FQcFAiaI43NDnR0DEHaa0cF9R-LF5zI02wuyNA724q-gROXMm2-XN5Td7wB9BHbWArE~GryB58blfve4BF~tvnpr1NwECb7PmiI5FeveNlWoINTykJFG9T2z8Ex1h0eivQDYebobi~RmDyArg~bpQR0Bf853-CsQkbIgwWL5V8KxNZttjo5reQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Jefferson County Board of Zoning Appeals voted to allow six full‑hookup RV sites as an accessory use at the Love’s Travel Stop at 1058 Deep Springs Road in Dandridge.

The decision came after a company representative described the RV hookups as short‑stay, convenience stops designed primarily for one‑night stays for travelers passing through. \"These are not really destination spots,\" the company representative said, and later added, \"The average stay is a 1.02 nights.\" Staff recommended treating the hookups as accessory to the business rather than a principal RV park, and the board followed that recommendation.

Why it matters: The ruling lets the business add short‑term RV capacity without subjecting the site to full RV‑park performance standards that would apply to a principal RV park. That distinction determines which performance criteria and permitting steps apply.

Details: The applicant said the company has opened about 103 similar hookup sites nationwide and operates three or four in Tennessee. The representative told the board the hookups are intended for travelers who want to stop near the interstate for a single night and, if desired, purchase fuel or food at the store. Planning staff noted the county recently adopted RV performance standards for principal RV parks and recommended clarifying in the motion that these hookups be approved as an accessory use limited to short stays.

Board action: A motion to approve the accessory RV hookups carried; board members voted \"aye.\" The board recorded no conditions beyond the accessory‑use classification discussed during the hearing.

What's next: The accessory use approval allows construction to proceed subject to any building, utility and permitting requirements handled by county staff and applicable state agencies. The board did not adopt separate performance conditions specific to this site during the hearing.","The Jefferson County Board of Zoning Appeals approved six full‑hookup RV sites as an accessory use at the Love’s Travel Stop on Deep Springs Road, with the board treating the spaces as short‑stay, non‑destination stops.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Residents urge commission to require RPC approval for two‑lot subdivisions after church‑camp activity at Jim Henry Road sheds

Commission tables discussion on multi‑tier agricultural districts and proposed C‑3 commercial zone for further review

Regional Planning Commission adopts updated subdivision regulations on road construction, bonding and as‑built drawings

Planning commission grants preliminary approval for Mountain View Estates with stormwater and road conditions

Commission approves six RV hookups at Dandridge Love’s site as accessory use